On 19. 04. 20 2:16, Jerry James wrote:
What generates the python3dist(module) provides? I ask because I did
a build of python-nb2plots today for which those provides were not
generated:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1495361
even though they were for the previous build:
On 19. 04. 20 9:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 04. 20 2:16, Jerry James wrote:
What generates the python3dist(module) provides? I ask because I did
a build of python-nb2plots today for which those provides were not
generated:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1495361
even
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825443
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825054
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Please, let me rebuild Pioneer before pushing.
I need newer `assimp` src package.
On 19/04/20 02:16, Rich Mattes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to update assimp from 3.3.1 to the latest release (5.0.1) in
> rawhide this week. The following packages will be affected:
>
> fawkes-0:1.3.0-11.fc33.src
> mr
On 19. 04. 20 10:05, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 04. 20 9:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 04. 20 2:16, Jerry James wrote:
What generates the python3dist(module) provides? I ask because I did
a build of python-nb2plots today for which those provides were not
generated:
https://koji.fedoraproject
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hello everyone!
I specially love this one:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Sky-background3-c.png Shame it's so
small.
I don't feel like my screen is broken. While I'm not a big fan of squares
and similar background, I did appreciate the retro style. I didn't assume
there was something wrong
On Saturday, 18 April 2020 at 15:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as
> > mentioned in $SUBJECT.
> >
> > None of the depending packages have been rebuilt aga
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Adam Williamson wrote:
> for instance, the halftoning is a choice
Well, I don't see how it makes sense to deliberately create a low-quality
image with no technical need (nor technical benefits such as size saving).
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailin
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 15:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And to Michael's point about Ubuntu's branding, they have a set of
>> design principles that they use to simultaneously present "Ubuntu" and
>> the Ubuntu "release" by leveraging their codename scheme and imbuing
>> it
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> after a few particularly unflattering ones had been selected: inside
> jokes (and one that also happened to offend all Hindus, vegetarians, and
> vegans at once),
I happen to be offended by that slight of offense! /s
Seriously, as a member
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Correction, this is valid:
>
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#local-version-identifiers
>
> But in this package case, we don't want version 0, so valid, but wrong.
>
>
> Followup on the generator problem:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-s
On 19. 04. 20 16:39, Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Correction, this is valid:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#local-version-identifiers
But in this package case, we don't want version 0, so valid, but wrong.
Followup on the generator proble
On 19. 04. 20 17:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Anyway, now that I know what the immediate problem is, I'll try to
work around it. Regards,
In this particular case the version is trying to be read from git, I recommend
using %autosetup -S git and creating a %{version} tag in %prep.
I'll send a PR
OLD: Fedora-32-20200418.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200419.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 19. 04. 20 17:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 04. 20 17:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Anyway, now that I know what the immediate problem is, I'll try to
work around it. Regards,
I'll send a PR shortly.
Finishing the commit message...
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nb2plots/pull-requ
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 04. 20 17:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 19. 04. 20 17:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> I'll send a PR shortly.
> > Finishing the commit message...
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nb2plots/pull-request/2
Thank you!
--
Jerry
Hello together,
as json-c 0.14 has been released today, I'm going to push an updated
package to Rawhide within the next days. Within that procedure I'll
take care of all needed rebuilds.
I don't expect any major FTBFS, since I've already added patches to the
packages that needed. The patches
I was asked by David how we do OCaml builds, and finally I've written it up:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-ocaml-rebuild.git;a=blob;f=README
TL;DR - it's hard!
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200418.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200419.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 17.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> Well, I don't see how it makes sense to deliberately create a low-quality
> image with no technical need (nor technical benefits such as size saving).
I'd suggest it's for roughly the same reason that people still paint paintings
when, nowadays, they could just take a photograph. I don't pret
Hello,
yesterday, I was updating documentation for rpkg macros
(https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg-util/macro_reference.html) and I noticed
that maybe, the behavior of git_release macro could be improved.
This is a bit long question because I need to describe some details...
intro
--
git_release
Thanks for answers, comment in the text follows.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:16 PM clime wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:05, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 14. 04. 20 v 0:13 Ondrej Nosek napsal(a):
> >
> > TLDR: Is $SUBJ function reasonable to implement in fedpkg?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > some
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 01:33, Ondrej Nosek wrote:
>
> Thanks for answers, comment in the text follows.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:16 PM clime wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:05, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Dne 14. 04. 20 v 0:13 Ondrej Nosek napsal(a):
>> >
>> > TLDR: Is $SUBJ fu
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 01:54, clime wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 01:33, Ondrej Nosek wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for answers, comment in the text follows.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:16 PM clime wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:05, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dne 14.
Le 20-04-17 à 09 h 09, Benson Muite a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
Please vote for ones that you like.
Is the default wallpaper the result of a vote, or only
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, at 5:56 AM, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> Le 20-04-17 à 09 h 09, Benson Muite a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
> > Please
29 matches
Mail list logo
