On 24/03/2020 12:08, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> Why would you care though, care to elaborate? And how would you personally
> know what is going on? Clearly there are reasons for it to go to a different
> venue and you just blindly assume that this is censorship and whatnot.
>
I just wa
Dne 24. 03. 20 v 11:43 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
> On 24/03/2020 09:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
>> ELN is an evolution of the request for an alternate buildroot for
>> newer x86_64 processors. The reasoning behind that new buildroot was
>> that we expected that the next major release of
On 24/03/2020 12:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24. 03. 20 v 11:43 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
On 24/03/2020 09:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
ELN is an evolution of the request for an alternate buildroot for
newer x86_64 processors. The reasoning behind that new buildroot was
that we expecte
On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 17:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 03. 20 17:31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > The new openssl-1.1.1e is coming to Rawhide.
> >
> > It reports premature EOF/improper shutdown on TLS connections more
> > properly. However this might make some dependencies broken in build
> > te
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:13:57PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> I thought the above was saying there were fundamental architectural
> differences in the way the builds worked, rather than just that people
> might choose to make different choices in the spec file.
>
RHEL supports building n
On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 12:27 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2020 12:08, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>
> > Why would you care though, care to elaborate? And how would you
> > personally know what is going on? Clearly there are reasons for it
> > to go to a different venue and you just bl
Hello Pythonistas.
(I've CC'ed the devel list for further exposure. But let's discuss this on
python-devel list please to avoid noise.)
We would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to "python39" to make
maintaining various Python versions in various Fedora versions easier.
The
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 7:28 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Sending this to another list is not the solution. Langhoff unleashed
> this monster on this list and it is time for people to show some respect
Of all the players in this saga, it turns out that I am the unleasher
of monsters?
With apologie
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:31 am, Marius Schwarz
wrote:
If it's a requester after the desktop showed up, it's most likely the
keyring daemon asking to unlock your keyring.
Yup.
1. Install seahorse (Passwords and Keys)
2. Look for Login (login keyring) in the left sidebar
3. Right click -> cha
Il giorno lun, 23/03/2020 alle 13.36 -0600, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
> However, they are no individually encrypted
I have try on VM and work as expected: no double encryption are done
But yesterday when I have try to install F32 on my new Dell G5-15 notebook the
behavior was this:
/dev/mapper/luk
Now five. ppc64le this time.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 7:10 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've had four ceph builds die in the last 12ish hours. One of them was a
> scratch build on x86_64; the others were regular builds, one on ppc64le,
> and the other two on x86_64.
>
> I don't know
On 24/03/2020 13:47, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 7:28 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Sending this to another list is not the solution. Langhoff unleashed
>> this monster on this list and it is time for people to show some respect
>
> Of all the players in this saga, it turns o
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomas Mraz"
> To: "Miro Hrončok" , "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Cc: "python-maint"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 1:22:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Heads up: OpenSSL-1.1.1e coming to Rawhide
>
> On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 17:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok
On 24. 03. 20 10:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
== Summary ==
The goal of the ELN project is to continuously build Fedora Rawhide
packages and composes in the way which
OLD: Fedora-32-20200323.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200324.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 14.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 09:52 -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Tomas Mraz"
> > To: "Miro Hrončok" , "Development discussions
> > related to Fedora"
> > Cc: "python-maint"
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 1:22:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: Heads up: OpenSSL
On 3/13/20 2:24 AM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. Sorry, guys, this would have been my job to
inform you.
Any update on the rebuilds? I need a new 'mosquitto' to build a package update it
requires.
Thanks,
Michael
___
devel mailin
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 7/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200323.n.0):
ID: 555128 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: h
> On 3/13/20 2:24 AM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
> > Thanks for the reminder. Sorry, guys, this would have been my job to
> > inform you.
>
> Any update on the rebuilds? I need a new 'mosquitto' to build a package
> update it
> requires.
the latest version of mosquitto has a FTB error, not sure anyon
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 24. 03. 20 10:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > The goal of the ELN projec
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200323.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200324.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 51.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200323.n.0):
ID: 555316 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/555316
ID: 555376 Test: x86_64 univers
On 3/24/20 4:21 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On 3/13/20 2:24 AM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reminder. Sorry, guys, this would have been my job to
>>> inform you.
>>
>> Any update on the rebuilds? I need a new 'mosquitto' to build a package
>> update it
>> requires.
>
> the latest v
"John M. Harris Jr" writes:
> it is important that issues such as this can be talked about publicly,
I disagree. It has nothing to do with Fedora development[*], and allowing
EITHER side to continue this "discussion" allows either side to badger
and bully the opposition until people comply jus
Respected sirs,
I am Devsarshi Goswami, a final year student of Christ University
Bengaluru. I have been using Linux for many years now and I have
developed most of my projects in python, Django and flask. I am
comfortable using container solutions like Docker and have completed 3
successful summer
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:16:59PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> it is important that issues such as this can be talked about publicly,
Sure, how about the council-discuss list? Or your blog? Or some other
forum where such things are discussed?
> otherwise we are all "living in f
Hey, Daniel,
I would like to say you are welcome in Fedora.
I think nobody really has a time or motivation to follow the history
so there is nothing that you would need to be explaining.
Personally, I only perceive there is some off-topic discussion going
on and I have no idea why but I think pe
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200323.0):
ID: 58 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
Hi
I have this big update [1] which I cannot submit to stable because
Cannot find relevant tag for bes-3.20.6-2.fc32. None of
['f32-updates-pending'] are in [...]
(and also for other builds, if I just try to remove bes from the
update). I suspect this is because some of the builds were submi
On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
I am going to answer generally in this mail, before we dive in into
discussing the details.
I think your approach to assessment of the Change is not fair.
Ouch. It's just that reading the proposal raises all of those questions. Sorry
if that's n
Hi folks,
Thanks for coming. We're making good progress on the Lab image and other
tasks in general.
We will meet again at the same time in 2 weeks.
Links to logs from today's meeting:
-
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-03-24/neurofedora.2020-03-24-16.00.log.html
-
https://m
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:28:35AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Now five. ppc64le this time.
I've cleaned these up now.
Mostly it was due to the upgrade on the builders this weekend pulling in
mock 2.1 and enabling it's 'bootstrap' mode, so it made bootstrap cache
files for everything. I've do
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 02:37:56PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
...snip...
Lets refrain from Holocaust and rape comparisons, they are completely
uncalled for.
I'd like to once again ask for this thread to die and folks to move back
to Fedora devel topics.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Descrip
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:28:35AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Now five. ppc64le this time.
>
> I've cleaned these up now.
>
> Mostly it was due to the upgrade on the builders this weekend pulling in
> mock 2.1 and enabling it's 'bootstrap
Il 24/03/20 17:48, Sandro Mani ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> I have this big update [1] which I cannot submit to stable because
>
> Cannot find relevant tag for bes-3.20.6-2.fc32. None of
> ['f32-updates-pending'] are in [...]
>
> (and also for other builds, if I just try to remove bes from the
> update). I
I recently upgraded to Fedora 3, but dnf didn't updated Python 3.7 to
Python 3.8. I managed to get around it with some rpm e and ivh with
nodeps, including python3-dnf, python3-rpm and rpm packages. Anyone had
this problem, too?
--
Łukasz Posadowski
__
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:08:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 24/03/20 17:48, Sandro Mani ha scritto:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have this big update [1] which I cannot submit to stable because
> >
> > Cannot find relevant tag for bes-3.20.6-2.fc32. None of
> > ['f32-updates-pending'] are in [
Hi Lukasz,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 19:30:58 +0100, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded to Fedora 3, but dnf didn't updated Python 3.7 to
> Python 3.8. I managed to get around it with some rpm e and ivh with
> nodeps, including python3-dnf, python3-rpm and rpm packages. Anyone had
> this
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > I am going to answer generally in this mail, before we dive in into
> > discussing the details.
> >
> > I think your approach to assessment of the Change is not fair.
>
> Ouch. It's just tha
Mohan cleaned up the tagging and hopefully it will go out with the next
push.
If it doesn't, please file a releng ticket and we can get it sorted out.
Ok, thanks!
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 3/24/20 10:39 AM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
I tried to rebuild mosquitto. No luck so far. I will try to fix is as
soon as possible but no promises on the timeframe.
Upon a first glance it appears that upstream fixed the WITH_BUNDLED_DEPS flag to
function correctly as it has never, not bundled
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:50 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Two ways of fixing us:
> 1. Add a BR for 'uthash-devel' to properly de-bundle mosquitto (it has
> never been
> unbundled).
> 2. Add a Provides: bundled(uthash) and remove WITH_BUNDLED_DEPS=no.
>
Just for kicks and giggles, I tried the
On 3/24/20 5:42 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Just for kicks and giggles, I tried the first -- it still failed with an undefined
reference to `DL_INSERT_INORDER'.
Yeah, because our version of uthash is 2.0.2 and the latest, which has that macro,
is 2.1.0.
I can push a uthash update if we want to
On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 17:49 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 3/24/20 5:42 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > Just for kicks and giggles, I tried the first -- it still failed with an
> > undefined
> > reference to `DL_INSERT_INORDER'.
>
> Yeah, because our version of uthash is 2.0.2 and the late
Hi clime,
not a "proper" answer, but at least parts of the functionality that you
desire must be present in Koschei. Maybe Mikolaj Izdebski (iirc the
main developer of Koschei) can help you out?
Cheers,
Dan
clime writes:
> Hello!
>
> Is there a tool to which I would provide a package name, s
Hi everyone,
I am currently a Masters student in Computer Science and I wanted to work
on the "varlink support to Nmstate" project as part of GSoC 2020. I have
experience with the technologies required for the project, so it seems like
a good fit.
I had a few queries regarding the project -
In th
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:25:30 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:13:57PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > I thought the above was saying there were fundamental architectural
> > differences in the way the builds worked, rather than just that people
> > might choose to
Hello there,
Hope this email finds you well!
This is in with reference to the project idea of improving the N/W Linux
System Role shared on GSoC 2020.
I would like to tell you that I really liked this idea of how we're trying
to uniformly handle the configurations for Network-Scripts and
NetworkMa
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
>
I've finally had an opportunity to digest this change proposal, and
I've got some overall questions and feedback.
> == Summary ==
>
> The goal of the ELN project is t
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Am 24.03.20 um 03:27 schrieb Marty Felker:
> I am in Ubuntu for the moment but have a wicked fast F32
> workstation. My only "issue" is that I get asked for an unlock key
> when I boot when what I want is to boot directly to the desktop. I
> am the only one with physical or any other access to
As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
== Summary ==
The goal of the ELN project is to continuously build Fedora Rawhide
packages and composes in the way which resembles the CentOS and RHEL
build process and t
Hi,
New version 2.3.0 have been released:
https://github.com/libgd/libgd/releases/tag/gd-2.3.0
ABI/API is compatible
https://rpms.remirepo.net/compat_reports/libgd/2.2.5-2_to_2.3.0/compat_report.html
(some constified function parameters)
Notice that the gdlib-config command have been dropped (up
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> The RPM variables:
>
> * `%{fedora}` will return `.fcXX` (where XX is the Fedora version
> represented by Rawhide).
This will break things. %fedora has always returned an integer, why do
you want to change it to return a "DistTag"-ish
On 24. 03. 20 11:14, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
The RPM variables:
* `%{fedora}` will return `.fcXX` (where XX is the Fedora version
represented by Rawhide).
This will break things. %fedora has always returned an integer, why do
you want to
John,
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 06:16, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
[...]
> Further, attempting to censor *this topic* is not in the spirit of the
> Friends foundation either. It is important that we, as a community,
> can discuss the rules we've chosen to govern our actions within this
> project.
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 3:29:58 AM MST Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> John,
>
> On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 06:16, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Further, attempting to censor *this topic* is not in the spirit of the
> > Friends foundation either. It is important that we, as
On 24/03/2020 09:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
ELN is an evolution of the request for an alternate buildroot for
newer x86_64 processors. The reasoning behind that new buildroot was
that we expected that the next major release of RHEL would likely drop
support for older hardware and therefore c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
A month ago was msgpack 1.0.0 released. I'm planning to update the
package in rawhide in the near future.
This should start a conversation about a coordinated approach to keep
the update smooth for all packages which depends on python-msgpack
Am 24.03.20 um 11:49 schrieb Fabian Affolter:
> A month ago was msgpack 1.0.0 released. I'm planning to update the
> package in rawhide in the near future.
>
> This should start a conversation about a coordinated approach to keep
> the update smooth for all packages which depends on python-msgpac
- Original Message -
> From: "John M. Harris Jr"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 11:34:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Code of Conduct issue
>
> On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 3:29:58 AM MST Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > John,
> >
>
Hi,
I've had four ceph builds die in the last 12ish hours. One of them was a
scratch build on x86_64; the others were regular builds, one on ppc64le,
and the other two on x86_64.
I don't know if this is a new problem or just repeat occurrences of a long
standing problem.
Anyway, just FYI. (I c
63 matches
Mail list logo
