On 03.03.20 14:44, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be building gdal-3.0.4 in rawhide and will take care of
rebuilding all dependencies. If all goes well, I'll do the same for F32.
This is now mostly done, except for:
ncl
Unrelated FTBFS (needs to be adapted to GCC10/gfortran changes)
qgis
Fails
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On su, 08 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote:
Hi, I have post this request on samba ml:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228791.html
someone here have some suggest to resolve this issue?
I'm looking for the best way to register into DNS bind the windows
clients joined to domain int
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 08:58:37PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 7:02 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've just built the new camlp5 in Fedora Rawhide (only, not F32):
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42313992
> >
> > This may break the following depend
Dokuwiki has broken dependencies because one of them got retired recently due
to no upstream activity. There is an open Review Request for a still-maintained
fork of the original package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809097
If anyone has a moment to review it (it's a PHP library
Thank for reply Alexander
> I think it is a missing feature in samba_dl
Is this feature missin only into samba+MIT or this lack is present also
in samba +Heimdal?
> Since Samba's samba_dlz does not provide any dynamic handling of the
> ACL, you need to add it manually in named.conf for your zone
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing
> you need:
>
>
It
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
>> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
>> fedora 32 (+testing) rep
On ma, 09 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote:
Thank for reply Alexander
I think it is a missing feature in samba_dl
Is this feature missin only into samba+MIT or this lack is present also
in samba +Heimdal?
It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types of
deployment.
You
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> >> check if any of yo
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 13:51, James Cassell
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020, at 12:38 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Thanks Vascom,
> >
> > I'm not the maintainer so I can't add you, but I'll copy the
> > maintainer here as well, just to see if he'll see it. In case he
> > doesn't can you reply to the c
Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 13.17 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha
scritto:
> It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types
> of
> deployment.
Ok, it's a generic samba problem.
It's right if I fill a bug on samba bugzilla?
> You can add rules in the named.conf but they would b
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread.
>
> Hello Tim.
>
> I have 3 questions.
>
I'll selectively pick just the questions I want to reply to and leave the
rest to Tim :-
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:38 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> > In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running
> > rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the same as
> > rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need to
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed failure [1],
and one of the failing tests was
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
When I click on the label, I get redirected to [2], whi
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis.
Wh
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
> >failure [1], and one of the failing tests was
> >fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect
Hi,
My name is Aaron (golanv(fas)). I've been administering Linux servers for
around 15 years. Mostly, I've used RHEL clones and occasionally Gentoo in
production, but for the past few years, I have found Fedora to suit my needs
more and more. I started using Fedora 28 for user workstations
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:31 AM Tim Flink wrote:
> ---
> What does this mean for me?
> ---
>
> If you're not a packager, you will probably not notice the shutdown.
>
> If you are a packager, this will affect some of the results that you
> currently
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:59:19AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>for a recent systemd build, the automated tests results showed
>failure [1], and one of the fa
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
> /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as the value of the elf_ipv6_blacklist. That
> looks like this in rpminspect-data-fedora:
>
> elf_ipv6_blacklist = "gethostbyname gethostby
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread.
> >
> > Hello Tim.
> >
> > I have 3 questions.
> >
>
> I'll
> > It's not a direct response to your question, but one important fact is that
> > our beefy machines in Fedora Infrastructure are out of warranty now (and
> > replacing them would cost a lot of money, I assume). That's one of the
> > major reasons why they won't be migrated to the new datacenter
OLD: Fedora-32-20200308.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200309.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 11:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> Report with testing repos enabled:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32-testing.md
I see a lot of rust packages on this l
On ma, 09 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 13.17 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha
scritto:
It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types
of
deployment.
Ok, it's a generic samba problem.
It's right if I fill a bug on samba bugzilla?
Yes.
I tried
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:54:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
/etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as the value of the elf_ipv6_blacklist. That
looks like this in rpmi
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > Report with testing repos enabled:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/
Hi all,
Following closely on the heels of last week's 3.35.92, we have GNOME 3.36.0
release this week. A large chunk of it is already built, and I've already
submitted a mega-update to Bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed092680cc
Not everything is released yet though so I
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:37:33 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> > In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running
> > rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the
> > same as rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need t
On 3/8/20 12:04, Peter Robinson wrote:
* GNOME related:
clutter
clutter-gtk
clutter-gst
cogl
libchamplain
rest
* A UPnP stack, used (or at least used to be) by GNOME and others:
gssdp
gupnp
gupnp-av
gupnp-tools
gupnp-dlna
gupnp-igd
rygel
I can pick all of the GNOME related packages up, but I'd
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:12:26 -0400
> David Cantrell wrote:
>
> as I suspect this is an infra configuration problem with the
> s390x builders, I have just opened
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8731
> There is really somet
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:49:42AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:54:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:12:26AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
In this case, the blacklisted functions are listed in
/etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf as t
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 20/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200308.n.0):
ID: 536870 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/536870
ID: 536883 Test: x86_64 Workstation-
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing
you need:
Is t
Hello everyone,
You are invited to attend the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting this
week on Tuesday at 1600UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode):
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also join us there on the
@NeuroFedora group:
h
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:40 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> > check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> > fedora
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> >check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the
> >fedora 32 (+
Hi!
Anaconda dev here (a new one, but never mind). Comparing to the other
topics in quick docs, the Anaconda pages in the queue are very technical,
and I'd say more of a fringe topic than eg. httpd or kernel. So are quick
docs really the right place for this?
Is the wiki is going away? If so, mayb
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package metadata
... query all packages for their file contents, and then show
conflicts when two packages own the same fil
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 04:53:25PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > > Repor
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package metadata
> >... query all packages for
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> >
> > So that is a global config file...
> > RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> > 99% of users should not modify that, and it shouldn't be in /etc.
>
> I disagree. Use
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 11:49 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > > > /etc/rpminspect/rpminspect.conf
> > >
> > > So that is a global config file...
> > > RFE: move it under /usr, and only look for overrides in /etc.
> > > 99% of u
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:49:42AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> What I have in progress right now is the ability to add filespecs using
> glob(3) syntax that you want to ignore per test. That gets configured put
> package (or if the vendor decides to configure it globally, sure) in a
> .rpminspe
I didn't even know there was a problem with your blog in Fedora Planet.
May I ask why, how and when this happened?
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 01:34, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> One of the reasons my contributions to Fedora have slowed down is
> because my blog was censored from Planet Fedora
>
> I'd
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 23:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> One of the reasons my contributions to Fedora have slowed down is
> because my blog was censored from Planet Fedora
>
> I'd like to ask if people would like this censorship to stop
>
> As this was done shortly after the death of my father,
Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 17.44 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha
scritto:
> As result, it looks like it is impossible to specify ACL to DLZ-
> providedDNS zone other than through DLZ itself.
Thank Alexander, I will fill a bug on samba bugzilla.
Can I share the information you wrote here? (I thin y
Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 12:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package
> > metadata
> > ... query all pa
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-03-09)
=
Meeting started by mhroncok at 15:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-03-09/fesco.2020-03-09-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
I took libxslt and fluid-soundfont.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, March 9, 2020 4:07 PM, Miro Hro
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:17:35PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> I took libxslt and fluid-soundfont.
Saving 294 packages with one click of a button... thanks Gwyn!
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 07:32:47PM +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to debug a build failure of package lilv on ppc64le and arm
> platforms, x86 builds fine.
>
> [0] is the status of lilv package on Koschei
>
> The build core dumps while executing tests, in particular lilv_test,
> wh
This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:17:35PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> > I took libxslt and fluid-soundfont.
>
> Saving 294 packages with one click of a button... thanks Gwyn!
Not all heroes wear capes.
Iñaki
_
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> This would break processing with ‘rpmspec’?
With just rpmspec, yes. The preproc-rpmspec tool can become a wrapper
around rpmspec aliased prerpmspec essentially doing the preprocessing,
then immediately passing the result to rpmspec for
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 18:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 21:35:52 +0100,
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to
> > > check if
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > > Report with
The perl 5.30.1-451.fc33 update is breaking a few packages:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/perl-devel?epoch1=4&version1=5.30.1&release1=450.fc32&epoch2=4&version2=5.30.1&release2=451.fc33&collection=f33
One notable change is that it appears that perl-devel ->
perl-interpreter no
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:07 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> One notable change is that it appears that perl-devel ->
> perl-interpreter no longer brings in the AutoLoader, blib, FindBin,
> sigtrap, Tie::Scalar, and perhaps other modules. Is that intentional?
The changelog certainly documents that
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200307.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200309.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 149
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages
It was announce in message 'perl-4:5.30.1-451 split' [1] on perl-devel list.
Jitka
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UWJBPOBKLN6JD74AKQKZDOUO2DGUFL4H/
On 3/10/20 4:07 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
The perl 5.30.1-451.fc33 update is bre
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
66 matches
Mail list logo
