Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 08:56 wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 07:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 00:55 Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Neal Gompa" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> >

GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

Hello everyone, I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799560 As you can see in the last comment there is an upstream bug on gcc-10 which is blocking the package tests. What I wa

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200305.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:04 PM Daniel Mach wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to >> deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for >> early adopters and tool developers and we're hoping

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799560 As you can see in the last comment there is an upstream bug on gcc-1

Re: Stuck qgis i686 build

On 04.03.20 23:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Sure. Note that you can (and should) moving forward file a ticket for things like this. Infrastructure or releng should work. :) Ok will do! Since it's just one thread taking 100%, could it be a multiple thread issue? try building with smp_mflags 1? T

rawhide broken due to recent glibc update?

Hi all, I'm starting to see many packages fail to build in koschei, possibly related to the latest glibc update. All packages I looked at fail in %prep when running unzip, for example: + /usr/bin/unzip -qq /builddir/build/SOURCES/osgi.core-7.0.0.jar warning: cannot set modif./access times for ME

Re: Spend 5 minutes on reviewing a quick-doc!

Thanks everyone who reviewed a quick-doc already. We still have a few in queue: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issues?status=Open&tags=help+wanted A few of these are technical, but most of them only need someone to go over and verify that the information is correct. Please take a few

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:26:56AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing > > build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 09:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 08:56 wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 07:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 00:55 Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > > > > From: "Neal

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 08:56 +0100, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 07:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 00:55 Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > > From: "Neal Gompa" > > > > > > > To: "Development discussi

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:58 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 08:56 +0100, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 07:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 00:55 Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Neal Gompa" > >

Re: rawhide broken due to recent glibc update?

* Fabio Valentini: > I'm starting to see many packages fail to build in koschei, possibly > related to the latest glibc update. All packages I looked at fail in > %prep when running unzip, for example: > > + /usr/bin/unzip -qq /builddir/build/SOURCES/osgi.core-7.0.0.jar > warning: cannot set modi

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

W dniu 04.03.2020 o 19:03, Daniel Mach pisze: > Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. > microdnf > Microdnf is becoming important because it's part of > many containers due to its small footprint. [root@puchatek hrw]# ldd /bin/microdnf |wc -l 70 hrw@j13-qrep-04:cep

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 7:06 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > W dniu 04.03.2020 o 19:03, Daniel Mach pisze: > > Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. > > > microdnf > > Microdnf is becoming important because it's part of > > many containers due to its small footprint.

Updating wcslib in Rawhide to 7.1

Hello, I'm going to update (one week from now) wcslib to from 6.4 to 7.1. There is an API break, the changes are here; https://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/mcalabre/WCS/CHANGES I'm CCing affected package owners (astrometry, cpl, kstars and python-astropy). Regards, Sergio

Re: Updating wcslib in Rawhide to 7.1

Hi, Sergio, sourcextractor++ is also affected by this. Could you CC me in the future, please, just in case I overlook the email to the dev list? El jue., 5 mar. 2020 a las 13:20, Sergio Pascual () escribió: > Hello, I'm going to update (one week from now) wcslib to from 6.4 to 7.1. > There is an

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library? I'd hope not, given that we have cross-distro usage of DNF now, and a couple of them don't have systemd. Do you know which dist

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:29 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library? > >> > > > > I'd hope not, given that we have cross-distro usage

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:29:38PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >>Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library? > >> > > > >I'd hope not, given that we have cross-distro

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:35 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:29 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >> Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus librar

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:29:38PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >>Are you going to use sd-bus

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:35 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:29 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:02:47AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:29:38PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 P

mock inside docker

Hi, if I am trying to run mock inside docker, I am getting the following error: INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /bin/mount -n --bind /var/cache/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/yum_cache /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-boot

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

Great advice. Thanks Daniel! On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:08 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:26:56AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package hav

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

Thanks for reply, see my answers inline. On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing > > build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests. > > > >

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:02:47AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:29:38PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

On 05. 03. 20 15:21, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: Thanks for reply, see my answers inline. On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing build on F32 and R

Re: GCC-10 is blocking tests on my package

Thanks a lot for clarification! On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 20 15:21, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > Thanks for reply, see my answers inline. > > > > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: rawhide broken due to recent glibc update?

* Florian Weimer: > * Fabio Valentini: > >> I'm starting to see many packages fail to build in koschei, possibly >> related to the latest glibc update. All packages I looked at fail in >> %prep when running unzip, for example: >> >> + /usr/bin/unzip -qq /builddir/build/SOURCES/osgi.core-7.0.0.jar

Directory hierarchy in icon-theme packages

I couldn't find an answer in the Packaging Guidelines, so I'm writing here. My question is as follows: looking at the various icon-theme packages in Fedora, they seem to adhere to the following directory hierarchy: - 16x16 | - apps | - emblems | - (other categories) - 32x32 | - (categories) - (ot

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200305.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: mock inside docker

Hi, adding "--no-bootstrap-chroot" wouldn't help? On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:11 PM Christoph Junghans wrote: > Hi, > > if I am trying to run mock inside docker, I am getting the following error: > INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result > ERROR: Command failed: >

Re: mock inside docker

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:23 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > Hi, > > adding "--no-bootstrap-chroot" wouldn't help? Nope, still getting: ERROR: Command failed: # /bin/mount -n --bind /var/cache/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/yum_cache /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/var/cache/yum Christoph

Re: mock inside docker

On 05. 03. 20 15:09, Christoph Junghans wrote: Hi, if I am trying to run mock inside docker, I am getting the following error: INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /bin/mount -n --bind /var/cache/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Beta Go/No-Go meeting

Dear all, The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 32 Beta release will be held on Thursday, 2020-03-12 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9716/ A

Re: rawhide broken due to recent glibc update?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:48 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Florian Weimer: > > > * Fabio Valentini: > > > >> I'm starting to see many packages fail to build in koschei, possibly > >> related to the latest glibc update. All packages I looked at fail in > >> %prep when running unzip, for example: >

Re: How to add i686 package availabe for download on x86_64 system?

Filed a bug. @Kamil, many thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guide

Anaconda quick-docs need review

Hi, There are some quick-docs related to Anaconda that need review but require specialist Anaconda knowledge. Could someone that knows Anaconda well (the devs?) please look at these? - Creating a product image: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/218 - Anaconda logging: https://pagu

2 Kernel related quick-docs need review

Two more quick docs need specialist knowledge: - Building a custom kernel: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/210 - Kernel troubleshooting: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/209 Could someone with sufficient kernel building/troubleshooting knowledge please take a look

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On 04/03/2020 18:03, Daniel Mach wrote: > Hello everyone, > I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to > deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for > early adopters and tool developers and we're hoping in getting a stable > version into Fedor

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Also: builddep vs. build-dep ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guideli

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Dne 05. 03. 20 v 13:02 Marcin Juszkiewicz napsal(a): W dniu 04.03.2020 o 19:03, Daniel Mach pisze: Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. microdnf > Microdnf is becoming important because it's part of many containers due to its small footprint. [root@pucha

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Dne 05. 03. 20 v 19:38 J. Randall Owens napsal(a): On 04/03/2020 18:03, Daniel Mach wrote: Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for early adopters and tool developers and we're

Re: mock inside docker

Would like to know if this works with Podman. On 3/5/20 11:22, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > Hi, > > adding "--no-bootstrap-chroot" wouldn't help? > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:11 PM Christoph Junghans > wrote: > > Hi, > > if I am trying to run mock inside docker,

Re: mock inside docker

On 3/5/20 11:40, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 20 15:09, Christoph Junghans wrote: >> Hi, >> >> if I am trying to run mock inside docker, I am getting the following >> error: >> INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result >> ERROR: Command failed: >>   # /bin/mount -

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote: > On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd >> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate >> packages.  There is a new release in the pipeline and if somebod

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

W dniu 05.03.2020 o 21:01, Daniel Pocock pisze: > > > On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote: >> On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >>> >>> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd >>> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate >>> pac

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200305.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-32-20200304.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200305.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:197.15 KiB Size of

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 14:08 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > (OK, it's a single library with other parts included, but the sd-bus > > > part is the biggest by far, and also sd-bus uses sd-event and sd-128 > > > internally, so they'd be required anyway. The other parts are smaller,

Fedora-IoT-32-20200305.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200304.0): ID: 534129 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 18:38 +, J. Randall Owens wrote: > On 04/03/2020 18:03, Daniel Mach wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning to > > deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33 development for > > early adopters and tool

Fedora-32-20200305.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 26/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200304.n.0): ID: 533797 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533797 ID: 533804 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: 2 Kernel related quick-docs need review

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 18:33 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Two more quick docs need specialist knowledge: > > - Building a custom kernel: > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/210 > - Kernel troubleshooting: > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/209 > > Could someone with s

4 packages still requiring Python 3.7 in Fedora 32: Retire mailman3 and python-subunit2sql

On 05. 02. 20 12:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: In Fedora 32, we have updated Python to 3.8: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8 There are last 13 packages that were still not successfully rebuilt with Python 3.8 and they require Python 3.7 at run-time, causing broken dependencies. The

Re: 4 packages still requiring Python 3.7 in Fedora 32: Retire mailman3 and python-subunit2sql

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 05. 02. 20 12:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > In Fedora 32, we have updated Python to 3.8: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8 > > > > There are last 13 packages that were still not successfully rebuilt with > > Python > >

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

> We've managed to drop a lot of redundant code across the whole DNF stack > in the past years, but we have reached a point when it's nearly > impossible to consolidate the code any further without breaking the > API/ABI. Especially with PackageKit being dead[1], we can't move with > the old "l

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:51 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > We've managed to drop a lot of redundant code across the whole DNF stack > > in the past years, but we have reached a point when it's nearly > > impossible to consolidate the code any further without breaking the > > API/ABI. Especially

Re: multiple definitions build failure on armv7hl only

On 3/4/20 10:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Test building the latest gdl, I get the following errors only on armv7hl: /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/gdl.dir/basic_op.cpp.o:(.rodata+0x30): multiple definition of `typeinfo name for Data_'; CMakeFiles/gdl.dir/datatypes.cpp.o:(.rodata+0x50): first defined

unretire gnu hello

Hello, I plan to unretire the GNU hello package. (Apparently it was retired in 2012 just because the former maintainer didn't want to add "Provides: bundled(gnulib)".) Though it is fairly trivial it is a minimal system sanity package and executable tool, with gettext internationalization now too,

Re: Directory hierarchy in icon-theme packages

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 14:52 +, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I couldn't find an answer in the Packaging Guidelines, so I'm writing > here. > > My question is as follows: looking at the various icon-theme packages > in Fedora, they seem to adhere to the following directory hierarchy: > - 16x16 > > - ap