No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-31-20200209.0):
ID: 525919 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/525919
ID: 525920 Test
I would like to happily announce, that the migration was successful
and the outage is finally over. Everything should work as expected.
The outage window in which Copr services were unavailable, took
~7 hours and most of it was spent by waiting until the final data
sync finishes, so the migration
Hi everybody,
The recent update from cantor 19.08 to cantor 12.12 in both fedora 32
and rawhide bumped the SONAME of a shared library as mention in
$SUBJECT (maintainers in CC).
At least LabPlot still needs to be rebuilt on both f32 and rawhide
(maintainers in CC).
Fabio
On 23/02/2020 14:28, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
The recent update from cantor 19.08 to cantor 12.12 in both fedora 32
and rawhide bumped the SONAME of a shared library as mention in
$SUBJECT (maintainers in CC).
At least LabPlot still needs to be rebuilt on both f32 and rawhide
(maint
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200220.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200223.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 133
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 220
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 77.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
19 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 77/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedo
Hi all,
I have two packages that fail to build from source. As far as I can tell
from the build logs, they are gcc-10 failures. The typical "extern"
solution does not work me (or, I am not adding 'extern' at the correct
places).
Can someone give me pointers for fixing this FTBFS? Here are the lin
OLD: Fedora-32-20200222.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200223.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 76
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 661.33 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 23/02/2020 15:44, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 23/02/2020 14:28, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
The recent update from cantor 19.08 to cantor 12.12 in both fedora 32
and rawhide bumped the SONAME of a shared library as mention in
$SUBJECT (maintainers in CC).
At least LabPlot still need
Le dimanche 23 février 2020 à 14:26 +0100, Jakub Kadlcik a écrit :
Thanks to all the people that worked on this!
> I would like to happily announce, that the migration was successful
> and the outage is finally over. Everything should work as expected.
unfortunately, things are not stable yet
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 80/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200222.n.0):
ID: 526040 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/526040
ID: 526112 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:11 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:21:04PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could a proven maintainer have a look at
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpic
Hello,
Just an FYI, apologies for the cross-post.
Koschei is a CI for rpm packages that helps us packagers track package
dependency changes. It'll help us ensure that our packages are always
installable. You can read more about it here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koschei
mizdebsk was kind e
Hello Anthony,
I am trying to determine if you are still interested in maintaining your Fedora
packages, namely libffi.
I cannot see any activity in Koji since 2017, but there were some commits in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libffi/commits/master cca 8 months ago, which
is confusing.
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200222.0):
ID: 526204 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/526204
ID: 526205 Test:
On Sunday, February 23, 2020 5:06:07 PM CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > I would like to happily announce, that the migration was successful
> > and the outage is finally over. Everything should work as expected.
>
> unfortunately, things are not stable yet
The build boxes are deleted already, so I
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 3:49 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have two packages that fail to build from source. As far as I can tell
> from the build logs, they are gcc-10 failures. The typical "extern"
> solution does not work me (or, I am not adding 'extern' at the correct
> places).
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 09:47:58AM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:11 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:21:04PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > co
Hi
*Yet another* dependency for licensecheck (which I'm trying to get back
into shape again...):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806336
Happy to review in exchange
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Miro,
I would be very happy if somebody could pick up the libffi packaging
responsibility from me. For what it's worth, I'm about to make
_another_ ABI-changing upstream release (to .so.8). An opaque object
type (trampoline) is changing size in order to support Intel's
Control-Flow Enforcement
# F32 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2020-02-24
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hello testers! We have 6 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Beta freeze
exception, and 1 proposed Final blocker to review, so let's have a
Fedora 32 blocker review meeting on Mo
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-02-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
adamw is out tomorrow, so I'll run the meeting in his stead. Let's follow
up on last week's meeting a
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
24 matches
Mail list logo
