No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
> On Friday, February 21, 2020 10:52:27 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 22. 02. 20 1:28, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > I really must disagree.
> >
> >
> > In my opinion, once you simply disagree with literally everything, your
> > feedback no longer gives any significant meaning for the peo
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 23:54 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > 1. dnf-plugins-extras — Cannot upgrade to Fedora 32: Modules blocking
> > the upgrade path — NEW
> > ACTION: dnf team to implement module reset workaround
> >
> > 2. PackageKit — Cannot upgrade to Fedora 32: Modules blocking
Le lundi 17 février 2020 à 16:08 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
Hi,
> I am trying to track down a font problem with MuseScore:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790829
>
> The problem is that everything is displayed in Cantarell, no matter
> which font the user actually selects. I
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 17:40:53 -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Erich,
>
> While working on getting Fedora Jam a bit more modernized for F33 (the
> backgrounds and themes haven't been touched since 2013!), I found that my
> predecessor (Brendan Jones) still has fedora-jam-kde-theme and
On 2/20/20 8:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
It has been brought to our attention that release freezes starting at
00:00 UTC has been confusing for a lot of people. So, we decided to
change it to 14:00 UTC.
This longs for an explanation.
I fail to understand why 14:00 UTC should be less con
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, 10:47 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 2/20/20 8:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It has been brought to our attention that release freezes starting at
> > 00:00 UTC has been confusing for a lot of people. So, we decided to
> > change it to 14:00 UTC.
>
> This longs f
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Neal Gompa wrote:
> 14:00 UTC is 9:00 EST, so it basically means to everyone: do
> everything the day before.
"Do everything the day before" is exactly what was confusing about the 00:00
UTC deadline, so I do not see how the change to 14:00 UTC fixes the issue.
It is customary to give inclusive
I have filed the following non-responsive maintainer checks for bsjones
regarding packages fedora-jam-kde-theme and fedoar-jam-backgrounds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806161
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806162
Here is the fedora-active-user output:
Last login i
Hi Ankur,
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:34:40 AM PST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 17:40:53 -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> [snip]
>
> If Brendan is non-responsive you can follow the non-responsive
> maintainer policy to take over the packages:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
OLD: Fedora-32-20200221.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200222.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 97
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.98 MiB
Size of dropped packages:37.06 KiB
Size
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 7:58 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > 14:00 UTC is 9:00 EST, so it basically means to everyone: do
> > everything the day before.
>
> "Do everything the day before" is exactly what was confusing about the 00:00
> UTC deadline, so I do not see how the change
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 83/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200221.n.0):
ID: 525452 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/525452
ID: 525462 Test: x86_64 Workstation-
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200221.0):
ID: 525578 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/525578
ID: 525579 Test:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:33:42PM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:52 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Since this is an API endpoint of a real system which needs to be
> > updated correctly when the release events actually happen, it should
> > have the benefits pkgdb used
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:21:04PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could a proven maintainer have a look at
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpich/pull-request/2?
> It causes a FTBFS in espressomd, gromacs and now coin-or-Ipopt on rawhide
> (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
Hello!
I created a new saved search to list bugs for packages managed by our
scitech packager FAS group. You should be able to see it in
"Preferences: saved searches" and that should also allow you to add it
to your footer. This is the link (I think it only works if you are
logged in):
https://bu
On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 12:42 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:33:42PM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:52 AM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Since this is an API endpoint of a real system which needs to be
> > > updated correctly when the release e
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 1:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:21:04PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could a proven maintainer have a look at
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpich/pull-request/2?
> > It causes a FTBFS in espressomd, gromacs and now coin
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now
> so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1].
>
> Thankfully, most of Pagure's dependencies *are* now present in EPEL 8,
> so there's only a few tha
21 matches
Mail list logo
