No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
I've just orphaned rome (Java rss library). Couple of its dependencies have
been removed and I don't have neither the time nor the need to maintain it
anymore.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
Hello all.
COPR builds from SCM are still failing with no visible errors. Does
anyone know how to fix this?
Full build log:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/phracek/PyCharm/build/1241112/
P.S. I cannot even upload SRPM due to its size. COPR throw HTTP 500
error when trying to upload SRPM
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:24:09 +0100
"J. Scheurich" wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708
>
> | Result
>
> | GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706)
>
> I already started "fedpkg build", but it said
>
> ...
> Watching tasks (this may be safely int
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 11:21:34 +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:24:09 +0100
> "J. Scheurich" wrote:
>
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708
> >
> > | Result
> >
> > | GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706)
> >
> > I already started
So I have several FTBFS bugs most likely from the new gcc being more
pedantic. I understand the bug at a high level but I think it would be nice
if someone who really understood it could perhaps document strategies for
figuring out how to find the right file that needs to be updated and how.
Perha
For now I'm settling for packages which I know I don't want to be retired
to add:
# https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html#common
%define _legacy_common_support 1
To the top of the spec with a link to an upstream issue if filed...
Thanks,
Richard
>
___
In Rust world we package all crates as source code in -devel packages.
Then we use them to build the real applications.
Some time ago, someone noticed that we don't put licenses of those
-devel packages into a resulting RPM with app which is fair.
However, I'm not entirely sure how to properly wr
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> In Rust world we package all crates as source code in -devel packages.
> Then we use them to build the real applications.
>
> Some time ago, someone noticed that we don't put licenses of those
> -devel packages into a resulting RPM with app
Hi all,
There were some efforts to package RStudio in the past [1], but
they're all dead. So following recent work by Dan Čermák for openSUSE
[2], I adapted it for Fedora and submitted it for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
If anyone is interested in pushing this forw
On Monday, February 10, 2020 10:53:45 AM MST Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr
>
> wrote:
> > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know
> > it's a relative unknown in the GNOME world, as one option is shoved down
> > everyones' throat, but
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> wrote:
>
>
> > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned
> > > after 4
reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not
> > > CLOSED a
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 3:28:36 AM MST Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 2020-02-11 05:05, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
>
> > They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported
> > (you can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks
> > hibernation (for obvio
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 3:44:17 AM MST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:05:27PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > > "John M. Harris Jr" writes:
> > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2020
On Friday, February 14, 2020 5:37:53 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to fix
> this, please help with
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8652 ASAP.
A quick note: This only affected GNOME users, or those using
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> wrote:
>
> > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned
> > > after 4
> > > reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not CLOSED
> > > after 4 m
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned
> > > > after 4
> > > > reminders (after
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security fix?
> >
> > The repo metadata, I guess, needs some way of distinguishing urgent vs
> > non-urgen
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security
> > > fix?
>
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:23 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > > But the
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:25:01 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:23 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Similarly, a package with a med
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:28:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:29 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David
On Saturday, February 15, 2020, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:14:57PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 18:37 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to
> fix
> > > this, please
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 10:57:26 -0700
"John M. Harris Jr" wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2020 10:53:45 AM MST Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know
> > > it's a relative u
Hello,
we have just disabled Fedora 29 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 29 reached the end of its life
on 2019-11-30 and therefore we are disabling it in Copr.
That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible
to submit builds for the following chroo
Subj is an OCR system which needs to much love to be alive that I
haven't. It's not required from any other package, it never had upstream
from he very beginning and it is a `tesseract` OCR to switch to. So it's
time to say good bye for me.
It would be nice if anybody could adopt it (but I do
On 15/02/2020 21:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I was (probibly poorly) maintaining tinymce for a while because we used
> it for askbot. We no longer do need it so I am going to orphan it and
> hope someone out there has more time and energy to give it the love it
> needs.
>
> There's
30 matches
Mail list logo
