On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > - python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing
> > > with tox is automated in packaging macros, %check
Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
>
> The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync
> between
> releases, it doesn't actually matter as much as it used to.
rawhide does not distro-sync (and some may say that rawhide does not
matter, but early problem d
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 06:25:31AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:47 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:17:40PM -0500, John Florian wrote:
> > > desired impact, but we should practice what we preach, at minimum:
> > > make Fedora a selection for th
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> >
> > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync
> > between
> > releases, it doesn't actually matter as much as it used to.
>
> rawhide does not
Whenever I install pantheon using the terminal , a gnome session is always
installed with it .
Also pantheon doesn't install lightdm properly because if i remove all
other de's and then install pantheon i only get started in a tty and have
no way to access it .I would like to help solve these probl
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> Sounds good to me. If you run into any issues let me know.
I've run three kinds of problems so far...
* programs that link against both libffi and other libraries that link
to libffi (eg. glib2, gobject-introspection). We need to push new
versions of these libraries a
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200112.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 4/155 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200111.n
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 10:02 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > - python / pypi works great for %build and %insta
On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:51:36 +0100
Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le 2020-01-09 15:02, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
>
> > I have seen something like this happen in the past. I think it was
> > around Fedora 18? kernel time frame.. on certain Lenovo T440? if you
> > did a dd to a usb key, k
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200111.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200112.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hello,
I posted more benchmark results in this article:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
In short, bigger block size and higher compression ratio does not increase
the installation time for Fedora Workstation. I saw the opposite effect.
The Zstd compression perfor
Cool. I hope to have given him some useful and first hints by PM in IRC to join
as packager. Thanks for all the coaching, everyone begins with a small
intention.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/htmlcleaner
Have not maintained it for a time long enough.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exciting
Have not received upstream response about build problems:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741509
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
What about BeautifulSoup as an alternative?
https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
On Sunday, 12 January 2020 06:40:41 CET Jerry James wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Dan Čermák and I have been talking about getting Facebook's Infer tool
> into Fedora. Infer is a static code analyzer for C, C#, C++, and
> Java. I've put together package reviews for a batch of dependencies.
> The p
When his happens, I see 100% kswapd in top; but no change in swap
pagein/pageout at all. In fact, minimal I/O.
That lead me to this bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110501
And also to this recent kernel work, not yet landed and which may not
be related (since there's not much I/O
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:38:01AM -0500, Anthony Green wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > Sounds good to me. If you run into any issues let me know.
>
> I've run three kinds of problems so far...
>
> * programs that link against both libffi and other libraries that link
> to libffi (eg. glib2,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I posted more benchmark results in this article:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
>
> In short, bigger block size and higher compression ratio does not increase
> the installation tim
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:54:00PM -, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exciting
>
> Have not received upstream response about build problems:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741509
I'd suggest adding the note that was added to that bug to the upstr
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:38:55AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> > >
> > > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync
> > > between
> > > rele
Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken
> about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further.
>
> Do we want to drop release and changelog from our spec file?
Vo
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:20 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken
> > about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further.
On 12. 01. 20 22:19, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 10.01.20 um 17:36 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
Good Morning Everyone,
This is not a new idea, it has been presented at flock last year and spoken
about on this very list this fall, so I'd like to push it a little further.
Do we want to drop release
On 10. 01. 20 17:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Is there a different approach, e.g. by using towncrier[1] or something
comparable, to track changes outside the spec file?
Is the idea of using annotated git tags abandoned altogether?
We could even create a tool that would "prefill" a template wi
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:45 AM Bohdan Khomutskyi
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I posted more benchmark results in this article:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
>
Cool!
Do you have any tests to compare plain squashfs xz with zstd? The nested
ext4 stuff is really pointle
On 12. 01. 20 13:38, Anthony Green wrote:
* I can't get any python to mockbuild, even without the new libffi.
There's an error in the %install process. Known problem?
What does "any python" mean? python26, python27, python3, python39, python37,
python36, python35, python34, pypy, pypy3 al
On 12. 01. 20 10:02, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
- python / pypi works great for %build and %install, but until testing
with t
On 12. 01. 20 16:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 10:02 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 07 January 2020 at 14:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 01. 20 14:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
- python / pypi wor
On 1/7/20 11:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
Stacked images on the same media functionality is in the kernel, it's
not complicated, it's well tested, doesn't require any gymnastics in
the initramfs - your bootloader entries can each point to different
root=UUIDs and image assembly
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February
2020).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
Hi,
This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo.
A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks
should clean install more often, yet they don't.
If there's a new good idea, but it's a short term solution, the fact it'll
live forever acts as a
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:16 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo.
>
> A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks should
> clean install more often, yet they don't.
>
> If there's a new good idea,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 3:53 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 1/7/20 11:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Stacked images on the same media functionality is in the kernel, it's
> >> not complicated, it's well tested, doesn't require any gymnastics in
> >> the initramfs - your boot
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:15:39PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo.
>
> A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks
> should clean install more often, yet they don't.
>
> If there's a new go
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:15:39PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status quo.
> >
> > A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks
> > should
On 10.01.2020 17:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Do we want to drop release and changelog from our spec file?
YES. Changelogs can be automatically generated from Fedora Git SCM commits.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel m
38 matches
Mail list logo
