Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-10-28 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hi everyone,
Thanks for filling in the whenisgood. The new time for our meeting is
1600UTC on Tuesdays. You can see the time in your local time zone by
running this command in a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1600 next Tue'
So, the next meeting will be tomorrow:
https://www.timeanddate.com/wo
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:04 AM Andrew Dinn wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2019 15:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> > Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
> Please do not spread misinformation like this. It is very unhelpful.
>
Okay, sure, paid
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191027.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191028.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 81.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> > On 26/10/2019 15:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> > > Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
> > Please do not spread misinformation like this. It is very unhelpful.
> >
>
> Okay, sure, paid support continues for two more years, bu
- Original Message -
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
> To: "java-devel"
> Cc: maven-ow...@fedoraproject.org, "ant-owner" ,
> mbo...@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 1:30:32 PM
> Subject: Switching Maven and Ant to OpenJDK 11
>
> Hello,
>
> Currently default Java runtime in
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:52 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
> > I am planning to switch Maven 3.6 and Ant 1.10 modules to build with
> > and run on OpenJDK 11, which is the latest LTS release of OpenJDK.
> > This also means that future streams of javapackages-tools module will
> > default to use OpenJDK 11
Hi everyone, I'm getting an error (below) trying to request a repo for
a new package. I have my Bugzilla API key specified in
~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzillarc (as well as in ~/.bugzillarc, and
I even tried adding it to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf in a variety of
ways). I've confirmed that the AP
One of the recurring themes in the ongoing Modularity threads has been that
we've made references to the problems we're trying to solve, but we haven't
done a good job of gathering those requirements and use-cases into a single
place. To resolve this, I've written a (fairly long) blog post describi
On 10/28/19 2:59 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hi everyone, I'm getting an error (below) trying to request a repo for
> a new package. I have my Bugzilla API key specified in
> ~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzillarc (as well as in ~/.bugzillarc, and
> I even tried adding it to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf in
On 28. 10. 19 15:38, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 10/28/19 2:59 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm getting an error (below) trying to request a repo for
a new package. I have my Bugzilla API key specified in
~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzillarc (as well as in ~/.bugzillarc, and
I even tried addin
> Or pip installed bugzilla.
>
D'oh! I had previously removed the pip-installed bugzilla, but not the
pip*3*-installed bugzilla. Thanks for the help, Miro and Cole!
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:15 PM Mariana Balla
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'd be happy to help with the Fedora booth at FOSDEM 2020. Other than the
> conference days, I can help with the preparations in advance (e.g. hotel
> logistics).
>
>
> Regarding the booth submission, I could help on that
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 02:09:04PM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> I guess it will be easier to just think about the branching date when
> Flock schedule is creating. However, I'm not familiar with the
> scheduling so I'm probably not the right person who should answer this.
Perhaps Ben Cot
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:11:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 17:34 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
...snip...
> > If those releng scripts are used for this, the PR might actually fix the
> > problem.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant. (Though I don't know if anything's hooked up
Hi,
Thank you for this very useful summary.
One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much more
to CentOS or RHEL than it does to Fedora. In particular:
> users want a solid, stable, reliable, *unchanging* system.
In that case, really, Fedora is not the answer. No matt
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 02:09:04PM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > I guess it will be easier to just think about the branching date when
> > Flock schedule is creating. However, I'm not familiar with the
> > scheduling so I'm probabl
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this very useful summary.
>
> One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much more
> to CentOS or RHEL than it does to Fedora. In particular:
> > users want a solid, stable, relia
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
>
> > > *Requirement*: It must be possible for the packager to specify the order
> > > in
> > > which packages must be built (and to indicate which ones can be built in
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this very useful summary.
>
> One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much more
> to CentOS or RHEL than it does to Fedora. In particular:
> > users want a solid, stable, relia
Gentoo's solution to "too fast, too slow" addresses every requirement
in this post, except for this one:
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:08 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Requirement: Packagers must be able to encode whether their output
> artifacts are intended for use by other projects or if they ar
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:33 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> Gentoo's solution to "too fast, too slow" addresses every requirement
> in this post, except for this one:
>
> On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:08 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Requirement: Packagers must be able to encode whether their output
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 15:33 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Gentoo's solution to "too fast, too slow" addresses every requirement
> in this post, except for this one:
>
> On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:08 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Requirement: Packagers must be able to encode whether their output
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 15:21, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this very useful summary.
> >
> > One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much
> > more
> > to CentOS or
I would like to introduce a plan I call Square 1 [1][2]
There are two goals to Square 1.
The first is to get, and keep, the core buildroot[3] packages, self-hosting[4].
The second is to get the list of core buildroot packages as small as possible.
What are the benefits to Square 1?
More stable re
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:11:13PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> > > > *Requirement*: It must be possible for the packager to specify the
> >
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:11 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:11:13PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 14:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 15:35 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> If we could operate on spec files and SRPMs, then the Gentoo solution
> gets to be an interesting option.
Yeah that's what I'm suggesting - to study Gentoo's solution and to
make similar changes to our tooling to achieve a similar solution. I'
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this very useful summary.
> >
> > One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much
> > more
> > to CentOS o
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend
on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of
them, preferably someone who actively uses them or maintains a package
that depe
Hello all.
New at packaging, here's my first review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766375
I recently started a new DevOps Engineer job at a company that pushes a lot
back out to the community, so this is my first contribution while I learn the
process.
Most of my past ex
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 29.20191028.0
Commit(x86_64): 226643fed3f9806eb3b0d2e4e3a8b83c4a173dc661488b74b19d7cfe587d7b6f
Commit(aarch64):
ebbf90da555377fd4862cc550808514d69342f2395a4eae700296c2bb9b76872
Commit(ppc64le):
d339aa4b2434e0ecf3545e919
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:00 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I would like to introduce a plan I call Square 1 [1][2]
>
> There are two goals to Square 1.
> The first is to get, and keep, the core buildroot[3] packages,
> self-hosting[4].
> The second is to get the list of core buildroot packages as sma
Hello,
While looking through literature today, I came across this paper:
"Ten simple rules for helping newcomers become contributors to open
projects".
Worth a read:
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1007296
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (H
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-10-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
36 matches
Mail list logo
