On 19/10/2019 20:38, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
===
[a]: Need owner
===
ledger
I can take this. This is such a useful utility that it'd be a shame to
have it be orphaned.
Best of regards,
Jani
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
Hi Jamie,
Jamie Nguyen writes:
> ==
> [b]: Remove my admin/commit access
> ==
>
> adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
> libmpdclient
> libuv
> mpc
> ncmpc
> newsbeuter
> notmuch
I'd be willing to help out with notmuch, as I am using it qui
Thanks Adam for the information. By the way I meant version 1.2, as v2.0
does not even exist. I'll try contacting the current maintainer as
you suggested.
Best regards
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 7:47 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 14:35 -0400, Code Zombie wrote:
> > It seems th
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:48:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:31:10AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > This is not true. It should be *possible* to have a fully modularized
> > distribution, but that isn't a specific goal for Fedora or RHEL.
>
> Because this keeps
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:37 PM Aniket Pradhan
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ankur, Matthew and Brian!
> >
> > > > > Is there anyone interested in owning this? If so, can you put
> together a
> > > > > proposal for Mindshare?
> >
> > > They
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 02:43:03PM +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> Hi all,
> since I recently submitted my package for sshguard [1] for review [2],
> this is probably a good time to introduce myself (some of you might
> remember me from the packaging list). I'm also looking for a sponsor,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:48:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:31:10AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > This is not true. It should be *possible* to have a fully modularized
> > > distribut
On pe, 18 loka 2019, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 11:39 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On to, 17 loka 2019, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > You could install the ipa-client package and enroll a system into IPA
from a
> > > kickstart in RHEL 7 too.. Without modules. That's what I've
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:48:13PM -0400, Alexander Scheel wrote:
> If you go to any modular repo:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/eclipse
>
> And click on "modules" in the path at the top, it takes you to:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/projects/modules/%2A
>
> Which lists th
Hello packagers,
I have identified that the Stewardship SIG owned some packages that
have now become leaf packages in fedora, since their last dependent
packages were recently removed or updated to no longer require them.
Because there's no point in maintaining leaf packages that aren't
useful on
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:35:37AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:48:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 08:31:10AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > This is
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:47:15AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:35:37AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:48:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
Am 19.10.19 um 19:38 schrieb Jamie Nguyen:
jasmine: 1
I'll check if I can take jasmine (this is quite a bit behind so I want to know
if the latest version needs new dependencies or so).
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
When i try
$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
over 60 days ago
What to do ?
so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
Am 20.10.19 um 14:21 schrieb J. Scheurich:
$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
over 60 days ago
What to do ?
A need a "new" review. This can be pretty simple if the original reviewer just
resets the "fedora-review" flag
$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
over 60 days ago
What to do ?
A need a "new" review. This can be pretty simple if the original
reviewer just resets the "fedora-review" flag and sets it again
(assuming there is no new
Hello,
I'd like some help to review a handful of Rust packages:
1763459[1]
_Review Request: rust-multipart - Backend-agnostic extension for HTTP libraries_
1763457[2]
_Review Request: rust-nickel - Express _
1763448[3]
_Review Request: rust-mustache - Rust implementation of Mustache _
1763
Hello,
after the recent discussions, the Fedora's "Fails to Build From Source" policy
[0] has been updated [1][2].
The changes include:
## The policy no longer requires e-mails to devel to orphan a package
This requirement made automation hard and resulted in most of the packages never
bei
I'll happy to help with that. Where do I start?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 11:32 Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:37 PM Aniket Pradhan
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Ankur, Matthew and Brian!
>> >
>> > > > > Is
So I am declaring myself an unresponsive maintainer on the
libmaxminddb and would like someone else to take this package.
libmaxminddb is part of the replacement of the GeopIP packages to work
with their new database. I took the package because it was orphaned
and at the time I figured I could pic
> I'll happy to help with that. Where do I start?
+1
I would be a newbie at this, so maybe I could help as a co-booth-owner
or something (don't know the actual designation :P).
--
Thanks
Regards
Aniket Pradhan
http://home.iiitd.edu.in/~aniket17133/
Aliases: MeWjOr/major
() ascii ribbon campa
Feel free to assign it to me and I'll try to make an update to it as
soon as possible.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 16:47 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> So I am declaring myself an unresponsive maintainer on the
> libmaxminddb and would like someone else to take this package.
>
> libmaxminddb is part of
Hi! I'll take python-sleekxmpp. FAS: limb. Thank you!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 19,
Ignore, I see that it's retired.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, October 20, 2019 10:03 AM, Gwyn Ci
On 15. 10. 19 19:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 10. 19 19:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, I see the following modules (in rawhide anyhow) that don't seem to
have non modular versions:
avocado
cri-o
django
dwm
eclipse
gimp
jmc
lizardfs
mysql
ninja
perl-bootstrap
stratis
Do all of those have defau
I am interested in this package as well, I can help maintain it (fas:
jtaylor)
Thanks!
JT
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 10:57 Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Feel free to assign it to me and I'll try to make an update to it as
> soon as possible.
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 16:47 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 03:37:57PM +0200, J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> >>$ fedpkg request-repo vcglib 1677989
> >>Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved
> >>over 60 days ago
> >>
> >>What to do ?
> >
> >A need a "new" review. This can be pretty simple if the original
> >
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 16:25 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Christopher Engelhard writes:
> >
> > > On 18.10.19 17:21, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > While you're right that the solutions from source distros (i.e., NixOS
>
OLD: Fedora-31-20191019.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191020.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191019.n.0):
ID: 472947 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/472947
ID: 472956 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_st
We didn't have quorum, so we didn't vote anything.
Meeting summary
init process (zbyszek, 15:00:12)
Meeting is cancelled because of lack of quorum. (zbyszek, 15:05:40)
Next week's chair (zbyszek, 15:05:42)
ACTION: zbyszek will chair next meeting (zbyszek, 15:05:52)
R
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-10-21 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:26:31PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Alternate Proposal:
>
> Most things from the original proposal in the first message of this
> thread remains the same except:
>
> Module stream metadata would gain two new optional attributes,
> "upgrades:" and "obsoletes:".
I'
Hi Miro,
jpype, as the one package only with obvious b0rken depenency, is already
fixed in rawhide to use unittest instead of unittest2. No idea why this
notification about orphaned packges still reaches out to me.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jpype/c/49fa1a4dd78b8ef2b09c2ce55084717d33e662
On 20. 10. 19 21:53, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi Miro,
jpype, as the one package only with obvious b0rken depenency, is already
fixed in rawhide to use unittest instead of unittest2. No idea why this
notification about orphaned packges still reaches out to me.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jp
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 15:20 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:26:31PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Alternate Proposal:
> >
> > Most things from the original proposal in the first message of this
> > thread remains the same except:
> >
> > Module stream metad
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> If I were to start from scratch on this, I would look at the simplest
> solution I would want from Boltron. I want to make it so a package team can
> make a set of packages in a repository and work out how I can interact with
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
