rpmfusion dropped support for gstreamer when it was retired,
Banshee is not going to be a nice experience for users if there are no codecs
to play stuff.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
This sounds interesting, but this tool is probably coming late into play
to fix early boot thermal throttling issues such as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598615
Vít
Dne 23. 09. 19 v 16:19 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> =
On 24.09.2019 09:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This sounds interesting, but this tool is probably coming late into play
> to fix early boot thermal throttling issues such as
BTW, I fixed such throttling issues on my ThinkPad T580 with this:
https://github.com/xvitaly/throttling-fix
--
Sincerely,
Vi
Hello everyone,
You are all invited to attend the Open NeuroFedora team meeting this week
on Thursday (26th September) at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode):
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
You can convert the meeting time to your local time using:
$ date --date='TZ=
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway
wrote:
or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back
Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we still have
this in the distro. It's been obsolete for the better part of a decade
and is probably filled with security bugs. I
Hello,
Just an FYI: The PR to add a new group for computational modelling
software was merged:
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/410
Thanks Kevin :)
One can now install the group using DNF:
`sudo dnf groupinstall --with-optional "Neuron Modelling Simulators"
--skip-broken`
This will
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 02:10:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Is it really good to replace the old objective with the new one?
> Shouldn't we archive off that one and call this one something else so
> you can see what was done when?
Possibly! We've done the modularity objective in phases so far,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:33 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> I'm still missing an offical recognition that there can be modules under
> development in stable Fedora. Otherwise we have no way of developing new
> modules. Fedora tries very hard to align module lifecycle to Fedora
> lifecycle. It does not w
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-09-25 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/
__
Hi all,
I'm planning to push asciidoctor-2.0.10 to rawhide in the
next few days. This is a major bump from our current 1.5.8,
but upstream has worked hard to fix regressions found since
the initial 2.0.0 release back in March.
The 2.0.0 release notes can be found at:
https://github.com/asci
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 08:10:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given a kickstart file (flatten) and we intend to make an iso using
> it, is there a tool or service by which we can estimate the size of
> the final iso (based on the packages defined in the kickstart file)
> before
Hi everyone,
We're just a few days away from the start of October, which means
Hacktoberfest[1] is upon us! Here's a list of projects I plan to
highlight in a Fedora Magazine article. If you have any others to add,
please let me know in the next day. If you're an admin on any listed
project and ha
installed Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-31_Beta-1.1.iso on a power8 PowerVM
instance.
The Installation itself was smooth but any attempt to install additional
packages failed with:
# dnf install gcc
Fedora Modular 31 - ppc64le - Test Updates 80 kB/s | 54 kB 00:00
Failed to download metada
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190923.n.0):
ID: 457486 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/457486
ID: 457492 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-is
OLD: Fedora-31-20190923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190924.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 127
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 85
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 893.63 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 17:12 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
> installed Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-31_Beta-1.1.iso on a power8 PowerVM
> instance.
>
> The Installation itself was smooth but any attempt to install additional
> packages failed with:
>
> # dnf install gcc
> Fedora Modular 31 - ppc64le -
Yesterday, I saw this error periodically in a few random arches, and
today I saw it more often (see examples at end of email). The
individual builds say something like:
> BuildError: error building package (arch x86_64), mock exited with status
> 110; see root.log for more information
but root.l
17 matches
Mail list logo
