No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
22 of 45 required tests failed, 19 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.c
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Branched 20190907.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190906.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 326.92 KiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190906.n.1):
ID: 445040 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/445040
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-
OLD: Fedora-31-20190906.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20190907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
I totally agree with that view. Making such decisions without public discussion
is not respecting user's freedom of choice. And this list doesn't count as a
public discussion. Nobody will know about it outside a very closed circle. If
you don't know exact numbers or reasons why people still use
On Sat, 2019-09-07 at 18:44 +, Victor V. Shkamerda wrote:
> And of course there is still an option to switch to another OS. Do I
> need to remind that Linux and Red Hat were not created just to
> replace some other OS, but to respect freedom of choice? What
> happened that this is not even ment
