Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Dne 30. 08. 19 v 18:25 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > Not. If you're getting it on an installed system that you're upgrading, Yes. > you probably need to manually switch the libgit2 module from the 0.27 > stream to the 0.28 stream, that should clear it up. No. 0.27 is the platform default on F30.

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Well, Whatever you set in the defaults, DNF ignores that on the update. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/master/f/libgit2.yaml https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/f31/f/libgit2.yaml On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:08 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 30. 08. 19 v 18

GNOME 3.33.92 megaupdate

Hi all, I've requested a side tag from releng to build 3.33.92 and 3.34.x updates for F31. Once we have the side target, please use it for 3.33.92 builds and I'll pick them up for the next megaupdate for Bodhi. I'll run point on getting most of the builds done. I suspect 3.33.92 is too late for a

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Le 2019-08-31 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : (I asked a few people what 24:00 means to them, and after getting a few strange looks and answers, To be fair: 1. ISO 8501 allows writing 24:00 Wikipedia> Midnight is a special case and may be referred to as either "00:00" or "24:00

Re: GNOME 3.33.92 megaupdate

I don't think it's that late for FE for F31 Beta, but this is something we can discuss on our meeting tomorrow. CCing Adam. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: (snip) > stewardship-sig: logback, gpars, groovy, gmavenplus-plugin I submitted a new build for maven yesterday which removes its dependency on logback, which in turn also means we no longer depend on gpars, groovy, or gmavenplus-plugin. Whic

Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.cl

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 54 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 99.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

- Original Message - > From: "Chris Murphy" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 9:55:52 PM > Subject: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in > low-memory situations > > Hi, > This is yet another follow-up for this th

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

Closing the loop: This package has been retired via `fedpkg retire` in f31 and rawhide. regards, bex On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:43 PM Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > Hi All, > > Barring objection, I plan to retire the release notes package from > Fedora on or after August 9, 2019. The package h

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

On 2019-09-02, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Whatever you set in the defaults, DNF ignores that on the update. > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/master/f/libgit2.yaml > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/f31/f/libgit2.yaml > It's not that DNF was ignoring defaults

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On 2019-09-01, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Being one of the biggest users of Modularity (more than 25 modules) > I'm surprised that: > > 1) Many builds are stuck for more than half a month > (https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/5639, > 13 Aug) Simply resubmit the build.

Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 31/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190901.n.0): ID: 440045 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/440045 ID: 440047 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso ins

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 20:09 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up! > > Were you looking for a go ahead to rebuild the affected packages in > Fedora proper? In that case, you have my whole hearted appreciation > for taking care of the eog and tracker-miners rebuilds. :) I would like

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 3:25 AM, John Harris wrote: > On Monday, August 26, 2019 7:25:27 AM MST Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 15:25, Robert Marcano >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: >>> Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break application

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.88 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:08:03PM +0200, Nikola Forr? wrote: > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 20:09 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > Were you looking for a go ahead to rebuild the affected packages in > > Fedora proper? In that case, you have my whole hearted appreciation > > for taking care of the eog and t

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Dne 02. 09. 19 v 14:25 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > The point is that the one who designed these rules forgot that people > will want to upgrade from an unsupported stream to a supportrf one. And > that the upgrade should be silent and automatic for cases when a user Negative sir. As I stated the chang

Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC (classicupdate). After few minutes almost e

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:14 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC (cl

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/28/19 1:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: >> mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris >>> wrote: No, that is not how this works, at all. First, let's go ahead and >>>

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: > I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / > CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? Just change a flag in build time, and all can

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:58 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? I was

Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi devel-list, I am trying to contact Chitlesh Goorah [0], as he is the maintainer of the Fedora Electronics Lab Spin [1]. The spin desperately needs some love and maintenance. Does anyone know how to contact him? I have reached out to him three times in total, once in 2016, and again twice in 201

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 08. 19 17:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 23. 08. 19 v 17:05 Kaleb Keithley napsal(a): > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > 2. However the IETF explicitely forbid it when defining the ISO 8501 > subset allowed on the Internet > > RFC 3339> Although ISO 8601 permits the hour to be "24", this profile of > ISO > RFC 3339> 8601 only allows values between "00" and "23" for the hour in > or

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: > > After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... > all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the cause is krb MIT? Also on the samba ml it seems a supposition.

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:14:35PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > a) For what purpose it's released Fedora Samba MIT-KERBEROS DC? This is for FreeIPA interoperability, described at https://www.freeipa.org/page/IPA_and_AD This is enabled because: 1) FreeIPA is important part of Fedora deliver

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alessio wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: >> >> >> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... >> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > > > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the cau

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC (c

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? Just c

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alessio wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. Wait. I'm not an expert. S

Sponsorship request

Hi! I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so I'm looking for a sponsor via this list. Technically this is also a

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi Geoffrey I am Alain, FAS: avigne, a micro-electronic engineer, mainly interested in CAD/EDA tools. I started my journey to become a Fedora packager with this spin in mind (+ introducing another PCB tool: pcb-rnd) I have been in contact with Chitlesh, and also with Kiara, who both stepped down th

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi Alain, Great to see there is some interest in the Electronics Lab Spin! Can you reach out to Chitlesh and see if he is willing to give up his spot as the maintainer of the group so that the spin can get the maintenance it needs? If I don't hear from him in a week, I'll just continue through the

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: > >> I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / > >> CentOS provided RPMs. > > > >Thank Robert for

Re: inotify-tools with dead upstream cannot be fixed in Fedora

On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi, > > Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename` > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472 > > Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package > maintainer requires to upstream

Re: Sponsorship request

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's > orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) > > I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the > FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so

Permission denied for relation pull_requests

What's this all about (seen after doing a git push to gap-pkg-hecke)? $ git push Enumerating objects: 9, done. Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 690 bytes | 690.00 KiB/s, done. Total 5 (de

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

On 9/1/19 2:54 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done > in F31 and F32: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640 > > Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it > as tagged both in F30-updates-testing a

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 02. 09. 19 18:58, Mat Booth wrote: On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 23. 08. 19 17:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 23. 08. 19 v 17:05 Kaleb Keithley napsal(a): >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok ma

Re: Sponsorship request

On 03. 09. 19 0:33, Fabio Valentini wrote: I can't sponsor you since I'm not a member of the required account group I think it's time you become a member of the required account group. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel m

powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the time estimates were sane. Something's wonky on Fedora 30 and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting, although I posted a message on the upstream powertop lis

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provid

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-09-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](https://docs.pagure.o

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13 clamav-0.101.4-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing geos-3.7.2-1.el8 libgeotiff-1.5.1-1.el8 mongo-

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >>> Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: > >>

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 4:13:10 AM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > > > If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small > > networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The > > distinction between

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:48:06 PM MST John Harris wrote: > On Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:33:47 AM MST Gordan Bobic wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM wrote: > > > > > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > > > ensure Fedora remains responsive under h

Re: Debates/back and forths

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 6:22:04 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote: > John you're comparing apples and oranges. One is active the other is > passive. One uses your space allocation the other doesn't. Sorry, what? What space allocation? If you're talking about emails, my Maildir hasn't reached a si

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

On Monday, August 5, 2019 4:42:31 AM MST Martin Kolman wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Barring objection, I plan to retire the release notes package from > > > Fedor

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 2:54:32 AM MST Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done > in F31 and F32: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640 > > Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it > as tagged both

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:26 AM John Harris wrote: > There is not a single service in Fedora that is broken by the firewall > running. You simply have to open the port before it can be accessed from a > remote system, which is by design. Basic access control, a security feature. Exactly.

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: >>> Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400

fedpkg push output

Hi All, When I run the fedpkg push iam getting the below o/p . Can anyone tell me is everything fine with the fedpkg push operation. git commit -sm "Initial import (#1735762)" [master ba1a11d] Initial import (#1735762) 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .gitignore create m