* Kevin Fenzi:
> On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
>>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
>>
>> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
>> thing is "how to build Fedor
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:31 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
> >>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
> >>
> >> I think that no one contemplate support
* Neal Gompa:
> Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> available on the mirror network for all targets we support as a
> project. Th
Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done
in F31 and F32:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640
Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it
as tagged both in F30-updates-testing and F31-updates-testing, but
there's no sign of them in the r
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
wrote:
If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small
networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The
distinction between a "Workstation" deployment and a "Server" or
"Everything" deployment should not include le
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cl
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190831.n.0):
ID: 439634 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/439634
ID: 439708 Test: x86_64 u
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages
John you're comparing apples and oranges. One is active the other is
passive. One uses your space allocation the other doesn't.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019, 19:07 John Harris wrote:
> On Friday, August 30, 2019 5:40:22 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > You just explained exactly why it was different...
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:51 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> > available
OLD: Fedora-31-20190831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastructure and made
> > available
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> > If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small
> > networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The
> > distinction between a "Workstation" deployment and a "S
I've orphaned jsch-agent-proxy, previously maintained by the Stewardship SIG.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472
Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package
maintainer requires to upstream the fix first. A Catch 22.
Debian has the crasher fixed by an off-trunk simp
Hello,
Being one of the biggest users of Modularity (more than 25 modules)
I'm surprised that:
1) Many builds are stuck for more than half a month
(https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/5639,
13 Aug)
2) F32 branching was not handled well, basically all Rust modules
ca
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM Emery Berger wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, my research group attacked basically exactly this
> problem some time ago. We built a modified Linux kernel that we called
> Redline that was utterly resilient to fork bombs, malloc bombs, and so on. No
> process could
* Nico Kadel-Garcia:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> * Neal Gompa:
>>
>> > Well, technically, the correct thing to do would be for Mock to
>> > support downloading bootstrap images to speed up bootstrap. These
>> > images could be regularly produced by Fedora infrastr
Per this suggestion [1] by hakavlad (Alexey Avramov), I did a single
test with earlyoom, a user space service that's already packaged for
Fedora. I have not yet tested nohang, also mentioned.
I chose a configuration that has fairly consistently (>80%) resulted
in a total hang for more than 30m. An
19 matches
Mail list logo
