On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
on the date when people are awake. I'll float the idea to releng and
then fesco.
That would be awesome.
It's r
Hi ,
Iam getting the below error when I run fedpkg clone fctxpd
fedpkg clone fctxpd
Cloning into 'fctxpd'...
The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't be
established.
RSA key fingerprint is SHA256:Q12OTyTeOHWlS54dTzy2BNu7wB8UKNf18+7WHIDsORc.
Are you sure you want to
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 12:50 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> Hi ,
> Iam getting the below error when I run fedpkg clone fctxpd
>
>
> fedpkg clone fctxpd
> Cloning into 'fctxpd'...
> The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)'
> can't be
> established.
> RSA key fi
On 30/08/2019 09:03, Jakub Jelen wrote:
Other possibility (if you are not a packager of the given package), is
to use anonymous http clone using -a switch:
$ fedpkg clone -a fctxpd
So long as you are in the packager group you can clone any
package without having to use -a you just can't push
Hi Jacob,
Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we
have in pagure.io .
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelen [mailto:jje...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 1:34 PM
To: Developmen
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:15 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
> Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
>
> And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key
> as we
> have in pagure.io .
That is the reason why I pointed you to the Fedora Account page, where
you
> Hi Jacob,
> Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
>
> And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we
> have in pagure.io .
You have to add the ssh key to your FAS account.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
___
Hi Jacob,
I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelen [mailto:jje...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 2:18 PM
To: Muneendra Kumar M ; Development
discu
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than
> > > three years (1
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 10:08 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
> > the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
> > on the date when people are awake. I'll floa
I use the gmail android app and on desktop I use the gmail web interface.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:19 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 8/27/19 8:36 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Regarding NNTP I've haven't used newsreaders in years and to be honest
> dea
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:17:18 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dne
On Friday, August 30, 2019 8:44:39 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd.
Panu said that the backport would be almost trivial:
https://lists.pagure.io/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4EFFNJNVAP35KH74N3W5GC4E2AQXC7V/
John Harris wrote:
> Thing is, binding a port and expecting it to be open to every network
> interface you've got are two very different things.
Once again John Harris is completely wrong. The bind system call is
precisely how a program specifies which network interfaces it wants to
open a socket
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
11 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.cl
On 28. 08. 19 19:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide only.
As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more.
Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>
> Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
> flags in aarch64.
>
> Something is amiss there. A small snippet from openmpi:
You're much better off including a couple of koji tasks/packages
showin
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
>> the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
>> on the date when people are awake. I'll float the idea to releng and
>> then fesco
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:41 PM, John Harris wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Book wrote:
>> I would agree, but people do install multiple desktops after installing a
>> spin. Such a use case needs to be considered (not sure if it matters,
>> though).
>
> This is defin
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 13:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
> > > the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
> > > on the date wh
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190829.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190830.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:11
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dne 23. 08. 19 v 18:20 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> There's nothing you can do, releng needs to rebuild modules:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8664
>
Is this error:
Problém 5: package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires
libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be insta
You just explained exactly why it was different ;-)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:23 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:09:23 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > It's somewhat ironic that Discourse would solve this issue. As I
> > previously mentioned, I also don't like having
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:55 AM Chris Peters wrote:
>
> PS I won't take this thread any further. The irony of a back and forth in
> the back and forth thread doesn't escape me!
>
>
That's hilarious and true. I was thinking the exact same thing...
___
d
Hello,
I'm planning to update exempi to version 2.5.1 in rawhide, and it
includes a SONAME change from "libexempi.so.3" to "libexempi.so.8".
Affected packages are:
caja
eog
eom
equalx
nemo
tellico
tracker-miners
I've rebuilt all of them in Copr [1] without issues, except tellico,
which failed d
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 09:06, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:51:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 07:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Maximilian Philipps wrote:
> > > > It has now been several months sin
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:58 AM Muneendra Kumar M via devel
wrote:
> I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
> Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
I'm on the same boat. It's been at least ~5 hours since I added the
keys to FAS and I'm still not able to
Am 26.08.19 um 10:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> python-cairosvg orphan, ralph 3 weeks ago
I can take python-cairosvg as I need it for weasyprint (which I hope to update
in the next weeks).
releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8716
Felix
On 8/30/19 8:25 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
But wouldn't 24:00/23:59 be even better than 18:00? And changing from 00:00
to 24:00 wouldn't even require changing the actual time (as changing to
18:00 does), just the way it is announced.
That is a little confusing in my opinion.
I would like to sugg
>On Friday, August 30, 2019, 07:45:19 AM EDT, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>>
>> Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
>> flags in aarch64.
>>
>> Something is amiss there. A small snippet fr
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:54:48PM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> Workstation is only the primary product because somebody decided GNOME was
> the best default. This should be reconsidered, so that the various Spins,
This is backwards. We (the Fedora Board) at the time, asked for a team to
develop ou
On 8/30/19 6:54 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:58 AM Muneendra Kumar M via devel
> wrote:
>> I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
>> Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
>
> I'm on the same boat. It's been at least ~5
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:43 PM Timothée Floure
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a few
> weeks ago. Sorry for the delay!
>
> The Fedora community contains a lot of university students, many of us
> packaging tools for their cou
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 06:27:56PM +0200, Chris Peters wrote:
> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality*
> over quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
> tiresome to keep up with)
I don't think that's a job for the code of conduct. Howeve
>>You're much better off including a couple of koji tasks/packages
>>showing the issue, it's much easier to get some real context.
>OK, here's one at least. I have had to manually add -DPIC to the spec for
>aarch64 in order to get>that arch to pass. There were no problems with it up
>until r
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:37 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 23. 08. 19 v 18:20 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > There's nothing you can do, releng needs to rebuild modules:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8664
> >
>
> Is this error:
>
> Problém 5: package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_
+1 for this idea,i'd love to join this sig
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:01 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:43 PM Timothée Floure
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a
> > few
> > weeks ago. Sorry for t
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:54 AM Michal Srb wrote:
> /me sending the email second time as the first attempt bounced back to me
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The package is, unfortunately,
> broken in all supported Fedora releases. The version of the package is the
> l
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 06:42:15PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> A slightly more detailed description can be found on the related wiki page
> [2].
> I invite you to add your name to its members section you're interested to work
> with us. We will figure out communication and coordination mediums
I've got a bug report[1] for BackupPC where the user is having issues with
AVC denials when browsing hosts.
This is actually from my COPR but it's the same SRPM I use for Fedora.
There are almost 50k downloads and this is the only report of a problem so
I don't think there's a fundamental issue wi
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied
'bitfrost' dependency — NEW
ACTION: releng to make Pungi config changes
2. desktop-backgrounds — Fedora 31 still using Fedora 30 backgrounds — NEW
ACTION: deskto
Jenkins in a container is begging for container churn with artifacts and logs.
Jenkins *slaves* are another story,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:38 PM, John Harris wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:11:43 AM MST Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM G
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20190828.n.0):
ID: 438981 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/438981
ID: 438989 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
>
> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
> thing is "how to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a
> RHEL-
On 8/29/19 11:37 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>> I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
>> squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
>> The bug which has the comment is:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On 8/28/19 2:13 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just got hit by this again - lockups on s390. Looks like I have
> 100% reproducer (just try to build Erlang and it will stuck
> eventually).
>
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37327589
>
> Where should I open
Hi Kevin,
It's started working.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fenzi [mailto:ke...@scrye.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 8:58 PM
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: getting below error in fedpkg clone
On 8/30/19 6:54 AM, Filipe Bran
If you're interested, feel free to add your name to the Members section
of the University SIG [2] wiki. I don't see why grad students can't
join as well :)
As of now, I don't think there is a set "agenda" for the SIG to focus
on. I believe around next week we will focus on figuring out the best
wa
OLD: Fedora-31-20190828.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:23
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages:245.40 MiB
Size
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:33 AM, Jiri Eischmann
wrote:
And the same document says:
"While our focus is on creating a top-class developer workstation, our
developer focus will not compromise the aforementioned goal to be a
polished and user friendly system that appeals to a wide general
audience.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM, Christopher
wrote:
Yeah, I also don't want a complicated installer. I just don't see this
disagreement going anywhere without some sort of compromise, and I
can't think of any others that will satisfy people. I think there's a
good chance this could be implemente
Hi,
This is a follow-up for this thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XUZLHJ5O32OX24LG44R7UZ2TMN6NY47N/
Has anyone looked at oomd, or is anyone interested in testing and
comparing it to alternatives?
https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/oomd/
Hi,
This is yet another follow-up for this thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XUZLHJ5O32OX24LG44R7UZ2TMN6NY47N/
Basics:
"zswap" compresses swap and uses a defined memory pool as a cache,
with spill over (still compressed) going into a conve
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:17:11 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, in the squashfs-tools case these are in the looaside cache, so you
could (all be it ugly looking), use:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/squashfs-tools/unsquashfs.1/sha512/6e1be535d370fb39b2a0e47c98052727bab94ae4f306
Hey,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 03:21:43PM +0200, Nikola Forr? wrote:
> I'm planning to update exempi to version 2.5.1 in rawhide, and it
> includes a SONAME change from "libexempi.so.3" to "libexempi.so.8".
>
> Affected packages are:
>
> caja
> eog
> eom
> equalx
> nemo
> tellico
> tracker-miners
On 30. 08. 19 18:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
Not. If you're getting it on an installed system that you're upgrading,
you probably need to manually switch the libgit2 module from the 0.27
stream to the 0.28 stream, that should clear it up.
I'm hit by this when trying to upgrade to F31:
Problém
Due to the US holiday, several of us won't be there. The next meeting
will be on Monday (2019-09-09).
Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:43 AM Timothée Floure
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a few
> weeks ago. Sorry for the delay!
>
> The Fedora community contains a lot of university students, many of us
> packaging tools for their cou
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:26 AM Martin Kolman wrote:
>
> I would personally still find even 24:00 confusing & would really suggest
> something
> clearly inambigous, such as 23:45 UTC or similar - that should clear any
> doubt of which day
> the freeze is part of once and for all & yet again no a
# F31 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-09-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final
blocker and 10 proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have a
Fedora 31 blocker review meeting ON **TUESD
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday, as it's a
public holiday in the US, Canada and India, so many folks would be
missing. It would be good to follow up on the btrfs and Xen
discussions, but we can do it the following week I think. Note that
there will be a blocker review me
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just got hit by this again - lockups on s390. Looks like I have
> 100% reproducer (just try to build Erlang and it will stuck
> eventually).
>
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37327589
>
> Where
62 matches
Mail list logo
