On 22/08/2019 00:10, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, the Fedora Workstation working group has this as an issue
> being explored by a subgroup very soon, and make recommendations back
> to the working group. So there will be a lot more discussion about
> this in the near future.
> https://pagure.io/fe
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 07:53:19 +0200, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems to indicate that there is an incompatibility in how numpy
> calls cython macros.
>
> On 8/22/19 12:38 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > error: macro "__Pyx_PyCode_New" requires 16 arguments, but only 15 given
>
> Actually, th
* John Harris:
> RE: No longer supporting mailing lists:
> This project literally cannot function without mailing lists. We do not
> currently have a viable alternative. See all of the issues we've had trying
> to
> work with Mailing List mode on Discourse. It is not a complete feature, so we
Hi all,
ABRT currently provides a D-Bus daemon, abrt-configuration, for reading and
changing the config files of ABRT and its plugins. It was introduced 6
years ago without much fanfare and its source code has not been touched
since.
The original use case seems to have been in machine provisionin
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 6:51 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Have you ever encountered the daily message limit? It seems to be quite
> low, at 100. That alone seems to make mailing list mode useless.
>
>
The daily message limit is a site controlled parameter. It can be changed
by the
administrato
New release of systemd is now building in rawhide and branched.
Two important changes:
- The unified cgroup hierarchy (cgroupsv2) is now the default.
Use systemd.unified-cgroup-hierarchy=0 on the kernel command line to
undo this change.
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CGroupsV2]
- BFQ
Hey all, subject line says it all. I’m trying to get in contact with
Eric Smith (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Brouhaha) regarding the
libbsd package. I’ve emailed him directly but haven’t heard back;
does anyone know if he’s still active in the Fedora community?
Thanks,
Ron
___
I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs
to get it building again is to disable the gtk-doc generation...
I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
else does, I will claim it.
If you want it (or know of some reason it shouldn't b
On 22/08/2019 13:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
- BFQ is used as the default scheduler for disks, mmc cards, etc.
[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738828]
Looking at the patch you're applying it looks like NVME disks
are not currently included - was that deliberate?
I
Hi all,
I filed a releng ticket about a week ago [0] but haven't heard back.
Is there any action I can take myself to move this along?
Thanks,
Alex
[0]: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8637
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hi,
Nothing in Fedora depends on rubygem-audited and I don't have any other
use for this package, therefore I am orphaning it.
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
Cassandra has been originally packaged by folks in our team, in the time
we had some stakes there. Since then, priorities changed and also people
involved are not in our team any more. We tried to keep it packaged in
Fedora with reasonable effort, but turned to be too big burden recently
(depen
OLD: Fedora-31-20190820.n.4
NEW: Fedora-31-20190822.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:11
Upgraded packages: 194
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 132.21 KiB
Size of dropped packages:1.67 MiB
Hello,
This package is dead upstream and nothing depends on it in Fedora,
therefore I am orphaning it.
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:44:29 -0500, tachokni...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hey all, subject line says it all. I’m trying to get in contact with
> Eric Smith (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Brouhaha) regarding the
> libbsd package. I’ve emailed him directly but haven’t heard back;
> does anyone
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190820.n.4):
ID: 434419 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/434419
Old failures (same test failed in Fedo
Hello,
rubygem-journey - This package is dead upstream (actually it was
subsumed into Ruby on Rails) and nothing depends on it in Fedora.
rubygem-rbovirt - Nothing depends on this package in Fedora and I have
no other use for it.
Vít
___
devel mailin
I opened a ticket here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2213 for my
specific package.
On 22 Aug 2019, at 8:29, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:44:29 -0500, tachokni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all, subject line says it all. I’m trying to get in contact
with
Eric Smith (https://fe
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 02:09:03PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 22/08/2019 13:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> >- BFQ is used as the default scheduler for disks, mmc cards, etc.
> > [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738828]
>
> Looking at the patch you're applying it look
Hi. Probably I missed some announcement, but my doublecmd builds have started
to fail a few days ago in rawhide with:
> Complete!
> Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
> ERROR: Exception(/tmp/tmp5fbduv2b/doublecmd-gtk.spec)
> Config(1015329-fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 57 seconds
> INFO: Results a
On 22. 08. 19 17:37, Marcin Zajaczkowski wrote:
Hi. Probably I missed some announcement, but my doublecmd builds have started
to fail a few days ago in rawhide with:
Complete!
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
ERROR: Exception(/tmp/tmp5fbduv2b/doublecmd-gtk.spec)
Config(1015329-fedora-rawhide-x86
On Thursday, 22 August 2019 17:37:06 CEST Marcin Zajaczkowski wrote:
> Hi. Probably I missed some announcement, but my doublecmd builds have
> started to fail a few days ago in rawhide with:
> > Complete!
> > Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
> > ERROR: Exception(/tmp/tmp5fbduv2b/doublecmd-gtk.spec)
>
On 8/21/19 2:50 AM, Petr Mensik wrote:
>
> I think f32 key should NOT be used until this is fully separated and
> compose for older versions exist. Unless that key was leaked somehow,
> there is no hurry, right? That hurry makes pain to many people without
> justification for it,
> I think.
Well,
On 8/21/19 3:24 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> That is not completely true. The only possible way is to update the
> `fedora-gpg-keys` first without anything else and that was the reason
> for [1]. But since [1] did not landed in Fedora prior the branch, there
> is no way to update Rawhide and keep ever
On 8/21/19 9:27 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/19 6:59 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> On Monday, August 19, 2019 10:50:52 AM CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>> Can we *please* send out the FN+1 and FN+2 keys a month before branching,
>>> to *all* releases of Fedora, so we can avoid
> - BFQ is used as the default scheduler for disks, mmc cards, etc.
Perhaps I am not seeing the right patch, but looking at what was posted on
github [1], doesn't this udev rule skip over eMMC and SD cards which appear as
"/dev/mmcblk#"? Also from the github discussion, what was ultimately decide
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>>> I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
>>>
>>> Is this expected or unexpected failure?
>>
>> Since all qtbase really needs is the egl headers (and not pkgconfig
>> specifically), I went ahead and changed the dependency from
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:44:13PM -, zfnoc...@gmail.com wrote:
> > - BFQ is used as the default scheduler for disks, mmc cards, etc.
> Perhaps I am not seeing the right patch, but looking at what was posted on
> github [1], doesn't this udev rule skip over eMMC and SD cards which appear
> as
On 22. 08. 19 19:58, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
Is this expected or unexpected failure?
Since all qtbase really needs is the egl headers (and not pkgconfig
specifically), I went ahead and changed the de
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 6:59 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> >> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm hit by the above error in rawhide.
> >>>
> >>> Is this expected or unexpected failure?
> >>
> >> Since all qtbase really needs is the egl headers (and not pkg
Thanks, so it looks like virtio and xen pv block devices (vd* and xvd*) will
stick with mq-deadline on Fedora.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Cond
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 15:19 Honza Horak wrote:
> Cassandra has been originally packaged by folks in our team, in the time
> we had some stakes there. Since then, priorities changed and also people
> involved are not in our team any more. We tried to keep it packaged in
> Fedora with reasonable ef
I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How
do I work around this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
> keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How
> do I work around this?
Disable gpg checks in /etc/mock/whatever.cfg ?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:03 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
> > keep getting errors about GPG keys not found for f31/f32 packages. How
> > do I work around this?
>
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
ID: 434613 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/434613
Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-co
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-1.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code o
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 22:43, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:03 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to do `fedpkg mock` to locally build some packages, and I
> > > keep getting errors about GPG keys
38 matches
Mail list logo
