Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-21 Thread Pete Walter
20.06.2019, 22:50, "Igor Gnatenko" : > Hello, > > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on > #fedora-modularity and other places. > > # Problems definition > > * Default modules can't have conflicting dependenices > * Changing dependencies in a stream is not supported > > #

[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190621.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2019-06-21 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190621.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora Rawhide-20190621.n.0 compose check report

2019-06-21 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 12 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 20/137 (x86_64), 4/22 (

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Samalik
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:08 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on > > #fedora-modularity and other places. > > > > # Problems definition > > > > * Default modules can

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Samalik
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:28 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:08 AM Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on >> >

ABRT CLI rework

2019-06-21 Thread Ernestas Kulik
Hi, As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng). For a long while now, we in the team have been pondering doing something that would result in only one surviving. In that vein, I would like to invite you to share your gripes, use cases, wis

Fedora 30 FESCo Elections Results

2019-06-21 Thread Ben Cotton
Greetings, all! The elections for FESCo election for Fedora 30 have concluded, and the results are shown below. FESCo is electing 4 seats this time. A total of 205 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 1230 votes (205 * 6). The results for the elections are as follows:

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > To keep the expectations of Fedora's stable ABI within a release, we can't > change the default stream of a module mind-release. I know, that's probably > clear and that's not the issue here. But building on that, at the same > time, we can't

Re: ABRT CLI rework

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:39 +0200, Ernestas Kulik wrote: > Hi, > > As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from > abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng). Are we? I wasn't... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happy

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-06-21)

2019-06-21 Thread Justin Forbes
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-06-21) === Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-06-21/fesco.2019-06-21-15.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Samalik
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:47 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > To keep the expectations of Fedora's stable ABI within a release, we > can't > > change the default stream of a module mind-release. I know, that's > probably > > clear and that's n

Re: ABRT CLI rework

2019-06-21 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:47 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:39 +0200, Ernestas Kulik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from > > abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng). > > Are we? I wasn't... I only ever use abrt-cli. I don't

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: The GNU C Library version 2.30

2019-06-21 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC230 == Summary == Switch glibc in Fedora 31 to glibc version 2.30. == Owner == * Name: [[User:fweimer|Florian Weimer]] * Email: fwei...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == The GNU C Library version 2.30 will be released at the beginning of August 201

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: No More i686 Kernels

2019-06-21 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels == Summary == Stop building i686 kernels, reduce the i686 package to a kernel-headers package that can be used to build 32bit versions of everything else. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jforbes| Justin Forbes]] * Email: jfor...@fedorap

Reminder: upcoming F31 Change deadlines

2019-06-21 Thread Ben Cotton
If you have a Change proposal that requires changes to Infrastructure, those proposals must be submitted (i.e. in ChangeReadyForWrangler category) by 26 June. Other deadlines approaching: * 2019-07-02 — Changes requiring mass rebuild * 2019-07-02 — System-Wide changes * 2019-07-23 — Self-contained

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-06-24 Fedora QA Meeting

2019-06-21 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have anything urgent for the agenda. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks, everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Communi

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-21 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "MC" == Michael Cronenworth writes: MC> Any long term plans to support C/C++ apps? Depends on what you mean by "support", really. Really there's just a new spec section that gets run and it just needs to echo a list of build dependencies. That's really all this does; the existing Rust su

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-21 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 6/21/19 6:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Well, how do those list build dependencies? How would you extract them and convert them to package names (or something else which is provided by the target packages)? Yes, something would have to be invented, and I guess that's why no one replied

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-21 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "MC" == Michael Cronenworth writes: MC> Yes, something would have to be invented, and I guess that's why no MC> one replied. Well I replied, bit I'm behind on email so... MC> However, the data exists it is just not available in a standard, MC> parsable format. And that was really my ques