Re: How to consume fedora-messaging?

Hi Adam, or anyone, On Monday, June 10, 2019 6:06:42 PM CEST Adam Williamson wrote: > If you're writing an AMQP consumer in Python, what you'll ultimately > get for your consumer to process is a `message` object which is an > instance of a fedora_messaging.api.Message() (or a subclass of it - a >

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

I will take exaile. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8459 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

Possibly Unresponsive Maintainer: gil

Hi, When working on the Java Stack for the Stewardship SIG, I've come across multiple packages that are officially maintained by gil, but it looks like he stopped contributing to fedora more than two years ago (I checked mailing lists, bugzilla, bodhi, koji, and his src.fp.org dist-git repos). Th

Possibly Unresponsive Maintainer: lef

Hi, When working on the Java Stack for the Stewardship SIG, I've come across multiple packages that are officially maintained by lef, but it looks like he stopped contributing to fedora at least six months ago (I checked mailing lists, bugzilla, bodhi, koji, and his src.fp.org dist-git repos). Th

Re: Possibly Unresponsive Maintainer: lef

Whoops, pressed send too early by accident, sorry. Original message continued below. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi, > > When working on the Java Stack for the Stewardship SIG, I've come > across multiple packages that are officially maintained by lef, but it > loo

Re: Possibly Unresponsive Maintainer: gil

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 11:25, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi, > > When working on the Java Stack for the Stewardship SIG, I've come > across multiple packages that are officially maintained by gil, but it > looks like he stopped contributing to fedora more than two years ago > (I checked mailing li

Preferred way of creating a Fedora Spin

Hi folks, How is the best way to create a custom spin of fedora nowadays? Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD the right way? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org __

Re: How to consume fedora-messaging?

Hi, On 6/20/19 4:11 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Hi Adam, or anyone, On Monday, June 10, 2019 6:06:42 PM CEST Adam Williamson wrote: If you're writing an AMQP consumer in Python, what you'll ultimately get for your consumer to process is a `message` object which is an instance of a fedora_messagin

Re: How to consume fedora-messaging?

On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 10:11 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi Adam, or anyone, > > On Monday, June 10, 2019 6:06:42 PM CEST Adam Williamson wrote: > > If you're writing an AMQP consumer in Python, what you'll ultimately > > get for your consumer to process is a `message` object which is an > > inst

Unretiring herbstluftwm

Hi, I would like to unretire 'herbstluftwm'[1, 2]. In accordance to the documented unretirement policy[3], I have submitted a new review request for the package[4]. I would be happy to swap reviews if it comes to that. [1]: https://herbstluftwm.org/index.html [2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/r

Dynamic BuildRequires on Fedora 29/30: Possible!

Hello, All applications written in Rust are shipped to stable releases via modules which includes building all crates (libraries), applications themselves and throwing away all crates (since those are linked statically). However, since we are using dynamic BuildRequires[0] as of yesterday it is n

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

> "PK" == Philip Kovacs via devel writes: PK> Years ago when I was writing my specs to add the packages I now PK> maintain, I recall someone recommended to me the use of these macros as PK> Fedora "tribal knowledge." I am happy to remove mine if their use is PK> unnecessary and could lead to

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

Hello, I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on #fedora-modularity and other places. # Problems definition * Default modules can't have conflicting dependenices * Changing dependencies in a stream is not supported # Why does libgit2 has to be a module? libgit2 is not jus

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2019-06-21)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-06-21 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be di

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on > #fedora-modularity and other places. > > # Problems definition > > * Default modules can't have conflicting dependenices > * Changing dependencies in a stream is

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 6:27 PM Jason Tibbitts wrote: > > > "PK" == Philip Kovacs via devel writes: > > PK> Years ago when I was writing my specs to add the packages I now > PK> maintain, I recall someone recommended to me the use of these macros as > PK> Fedora "tribal knowledge." I am happy

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 00:55 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on > > #fedora-modularity and other places. > > > > # Problems definition > > > > * Default modules can't ha

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 01:10 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > But ... if it's not for different version streams, then what *is it* for? 🤔 > (What about the plans to offer different versions of e.g. NodeJS via > streams? Is that wrong then, too?) > > Being able to offer different versions is the o