On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 06:03:34PM -0700, stan via devel wrote:
> I use a custom keymapping that I developed to save my hands, and
> because it is very efficient. It's strength is that the most used keys
> are under the strongest fingers, and that for my typing about 80% of
> what I type is on the
On 08. 06. 19 19:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 10:29:29AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 6:12 AM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Hi,
Imagine situation that somebody is working on KDE rebase and me on
libgit2
On 09. 06. 19 17:17, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which have broken dependencies.
For example, python-kombu was updated from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1. Both of
those versions have broken dependency "python3.7dist(amqp) >= 2.5.0 ".
However, it was built both for
Dne 07. 06. 19 v 19:35 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:28 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Interesting. I was specifically referring to this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675902
>>
>> So may be the FTBFS mass filling missed the deadline? Or was there some
>> e
Hi Stan,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:53 AM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how I would go about getting my keytable, which I
> call uneaf after the left home row, included? Is there an official
> procedure, or is it just a submission with a request to a programmer
> somewhere.
Over the
There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but it is
not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March 2018, so
probably we don't really care ...
Vít
Dne 09. 06. 19 v 17:17 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that people keep pushing updates which
I think there should be some feature in fedpkg, which would check for
side-tag builds and prevent any other builds if there is. The problem
is, that people does not know there are some builds in side tag and that
is understandable.
Vít
Dne 08. 06. 19 v 11:23 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> Im
Hi,
I pushed a new release of bup that removes the bup-web functionality
that depends on Tornado in Fedora 31+.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bup/c/b14777d7e8f5ff196e43afbb0ab50e4c2c7a4749?branch=master
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1284210
Regards,
Tadej
On Mon, 20
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/146 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID
+1 to prevent broken dependencies to be pushed into stable. If Fedora aims to
be a "polished"/"user friendly" distro users should never have to deal with
broken dependencies.
Also packages with broken dependencies should not be part of a release (maybe
not auto-retired if they are still ok for ot
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but it is
> not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March 2018, so
> probably we don't really care ...
The problem with that check is that it just checks if all d
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2019 12:20:34 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags
>
> Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> > But, what is different here from the Fedora circles / Fedora modules /
> > et
On 03. 06. 19 11:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 05. 19 10:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 20. 05. 19 11:26, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I intend to drop python2-tornado. There are following dependent packages:
- python-httpretty
build time, for Python 2 tests, tests can be disabled
- python-pika
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the
change, so no further action required from others on that account.
There are some
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> >
> > There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but
> > it is not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March
> > 2018, so probably we don't really
Dne 10. 06. 19 v 11:35 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but it is
>> not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March 2018, so
>> probably we don't really care ...
> The pr
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
>
> A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
> rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
> them, such as %python_sitelib and %perl_sitelib and their relatives.
> Python packages
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but
> > > it is not sent anymore. I last receive
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such as %python_sitelib and %perl_sitelib and t
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:34:16 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> > Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There used to be sent nagging email ab
On 6/10/19 3:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen
wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such a
On 10. 06. 19 14:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 06. 19 14:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:28 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from
rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around
them, such
Hi all,
I'm trying to reach bioinfornatics. According to fedora_active_user,
their last login was on 2019-03-27.
Open tickets:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700141
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674976
Does anyone know how to reach bioinfornatics?
Kind regards,
Till
Hey,
I've just built updated tornado in rawhide. It is big update (5 to 6).
See https://www.tornadoweb.org/en/stable/releases/v6.0.0.html
Highlights:
* no more Python 2
* deprecated APIs removed
Report any problems to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600318
--
Miro Hrončok
--
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha
will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly
promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the
change, so no further action required from others on that account.
There are some
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 9:33 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:34:16 -0400
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> > > Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:41:39 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 9:33 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:34:16 -0400
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> > > > Igor Gn
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:22:02 +0200
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Over the years I have resorted to different hacks to have my extra
> mouse and keyboard keys mapped to either other keys or key
> combinations, especially on laptops. With the changes on the stack,
> I've had to abandon most of them
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:24:21 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Keyboard mappings are managed by the kbd project [1, 2],
> but actual non-legacy keymaps are converted from xkeyboard mappings
> [3, 4]. (The idea is that it is best if the same mapping is available
> in the graphical environ
Hi all,
for some reason (not yet known, tracked in fedora infra [1]) ppc64le
builders fail to spawn, and what is even worse this issue also affects x86
builders. So because of this, we temporarily disabled ppc64le
architecture in copr. It means that the ppc64le builds will be processed
later onc
On Monday, 10 June 2019 15.20.56 WEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for some reason (not yet known, tracked in fedora infra [1]) ppc64le
> builders fail to spawn, and what is even worse this issue also affects x86
> builders. So because of this, we temporarily disabled ppc64le
> architecture
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 09:24 +0900, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:24 Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been trying to write some script which would listen on
> > generation of new repository / successful build is tagged in Koji and
> > do some actions locally. O
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Include_security_modules_in_efi_Grub2
== Summary ==
Include Grub's "verify," "cryptodisk" and "luks" modules in
grubx64.efi of the 'grub2-efi-x64' package.
Note: Although the build process will automatically include explicit
dependencies ("mpi," "gcry_sha1,"
So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm
digging into it.
In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally.
So far I can't reproduce it =(
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:36 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
> As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.1
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 10/06/2019 19:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How
Hi Miro,
I will request these for the stewardship SIG:
jboss-websocket-1.0-api, weld-parent, jboss-jms-1.1-api,
jboss-connector-1.7-api, jboss-marshalling, jboss-el-2.2-api, jboss-jsp-2.3-api,
felix-osgi-obr-resolver, jline1, jboss-jsf-2.1-api, emma, jboss-jstl-1.2-api,
jboss-servlet-3.0-api, hib
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 08:34 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> > Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch
> > > wrote:
> > > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken de
On 10. 06. 19 19:58, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi Miro,
I will request these for the stewardship SIG:
jboss-websocket-1.0-api, weld-parent, jboss-jms-1.1-api,
jboss-connector-1.7-api, jboss-marshalling, jboss-el-2.2-api, jboss-jsp-2.3-api,
felix-osgi-obr-resolver, jline1, jboss-jsf-2.1-api, emma,
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 11:03 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> +1 to prevent broken dependencies to be pushed into stable. If Fedora aims to
> be a "polished"/"user friendly" distro users should never have to deal with
> broken dependencies.
This is a very difficult problem. It sounds easy, but it...is
- Original Message -
> So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm
> digging into it.
>
> In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally.
>
> So far I can't reproduce it =(
Too late for any real bughunting by now, just untag and I'll look at it
Reviving this. I do not have the time nor the energy to attempt to keep
this going, so I am going to disable the shared bits in cross-gcc and kill
off glibc-arm-linux-gnu. It's been broken for a while, so I doubt anyone
will be seriously impacted by this. If you are, I suggest using this copr
inste
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 18:59, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi Miro,
>
> I will request these for the stewardship SIG:
>
> jboss-websocket-1.0-api, weld-parent, jboss-jms-1.1-api,
> jboss-connector-1.7-api, jboss-marshalling, jboss-el-2.2-api,
> jboss-jsp-2.3-api,
> felix-osgi-obr-resolver, jline1, jb
This was patched out, because an official feature was never submitted. Now that
RHEL8 is using that combo, maybe it's time to try again? :-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li
Martin Kolman wrote:
> But even for package development and integration you need something that
> works at least a bit. If you won't get a compose for a few weeks due to
> the constant breakage you won't get much work done on landing your latest
> library rebase or integrating a new package.
In th
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-06-11 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
46 matches
Mail list logo
