Dne 26. 04. 19 v 23:49 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
>
> == Summary ==
> Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
> support, Syntax Highlight and such) and switch to it in buildroot.
The change will likely affect Mock and wi
When I was filing mock's issue, I was still discussing how we can implement
this in GDB. This particular change does not require any mock / config
changes. gdb-minimal will not conflict with gdb..
Although that mock feature is useful on its own if we ever decide to
replace libcurl with libcurl-min
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190427.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190428.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 7.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:19:06 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> The restrictions by Fedora Koji prevent that, but yes, MBS and
> Modularity do allow for something like this. It can't happen in Fedora
> because our Koji is not set up to consume external repositories
> (except for EPEL, which consumes RHEL
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:12:48 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 4/26/19 8:53 AM, stan wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:07:54 - (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > I am a fedora user with no dog in this fight.
> >
> >> Controversial property of modules are private build-time
> >> dependencie
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 2/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID:
On 4/26/19 8:01 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following modular packages require Python 3.7 on Fedora 30:
$ dnf repoquery --releasever 30 --repo=fedora-modular
--repo=updates{,-testing}-modular --whatrequires
'libpython3.7m.so.1.0()(64bit)'
python3-pygit2-0:0.27.4-1.module_f30+2959+693db98d.x86
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 22:59, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
>
> == Summary ==
> Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
> support, Syntax Highlight and such) and switch to it in buildroot.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ignat
Hi everyone,
currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
This has always felt backward to me: those packages *provide* something
that is used by pkg-config, they don'
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
>
> This has always felt backwa
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Upstream has made a new release that changes the license from GPLv2+
> to GPLv3. I intend to build this later today. Since its main use and
> linkage was to GSL which is GPLv3 only, this is effectively the
> license the built work is already under anyway.
No more
On Sunday, April 28 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26. 04. 19 v 23:49 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
>> support, Syntax Highlight and such) and switch to it
On Friday, April 26 2019, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
>
> == Summary ==
> Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
> support, Syntax Highlight and such) and switch to it in buildroot.
Thanks, Ben, and thanks to Igor as well.
Modularity team,
On below definition of the modularity document, there is a problem, as Vit said.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_package_branch_name
The problem is If we use X.Y.Z as a package branch name with rpms/bar,
for example the situation
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
>
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:04 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> returns 4632 entries on my laptop.
>
> This ha
On 29. 04. 19 2:55, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
On Sunday, April 28 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 26. 04. 19 v 23:49 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
== Summary ==
Create gdb-minimal package (without XML support, Python
support, Syntax H
This is what wiki says:
- /usr/bin/gdb.minimal — GDB executable built without optional unneeded
features
- /usr/bin/gdb-add-index — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
package (modified to fallback to gdb.minimal if exists)
gdb-add-index is in both gdb-minimal and gdb-headless.
On 29. 04. 19 8:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 04. 19 2:55, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
On Sunday, April 28 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 26. 04. 19 v 23:49 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minimal_GDB_in_buildroot
== Summary ==
Create gdb-minimal package (with
On 29. 04. 19 8:26, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
This is what wiki says:
* |/usr/bin/gdb.minimal| — GDB executable built without optional unneeded
features
* |/usr/bin/gdb-add-index| — Executable script shared with gdb-headless
package (modified to fallback to gdb.minimal if exists)
gdb-add-in
20 matches
Mail list logo
