Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

2019-03-17 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 17 mars 2019 à 03:31 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : Hi, > > Numerous Golang packages are plagued with an issue caused when > jchaloup uploaded Glide files. In a lot of case he has doubled the > glide.yaml instead of adding the qlide.lock: > > Source1:glide.yaml > Source

rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-03-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables and shared libraries. I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 seems to be a good candidate, since

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-03-17 Thread John Reiser
I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables and shared libraries. I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 seems to be a good candidate, since all my affe

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-03-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM John Reiser wrote: > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > > executables and shared libraries. > > > > I'm not sure which change might be the cause of

Fedora Rawhide-20190317.n.0 compose check report

2019-03-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 26/141 (x86_64), 4/24 (i

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190317.n.0 changes

2019-03-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190316.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190317.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.35 MiB Size of dropped packages:4.50

Orphaning nodejs packages

2019-03-17 Thread Piotr Popieluch
I've orphaned the following nodejs packages. I do not have time to maintain them any more. nodejs-onetime nodejs-oop nodejs-opn nodejs-pac-proxy-agent nodejs-pac-resolver nodejs-param-case nodejs-parserlib nodejs-pascal-case nodejs-path-case nodejs-path-exists nodejs-pend nodejs-pify nodejs-portsc

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-03-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2019, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM John Reiser > wrote: > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on > > > rawhide are now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for > > > all included executables and sh

frozen approved review

2019-03-17 Thread Didier Fabert
Hi all, My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since a week now. What is the next step ? I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or packaging-guidelines[3]. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Didier. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168

Re: frozen approved review

2019-03-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:53 PM Didier Fabert wrote: > > Hi all, > > My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since > a week now. What is the next step ? > I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or > packaging-guidelines[3]. Have you done a "fedpkg reques

Re: frozen approved review

2019-03-17 Thread Tom Hughes
On 17/03/2019 18:55, Didier Fabert wrote: My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since a week now. What is the next step ? I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or packaging-guidelines[3]. Well it has passed review so now you need to request creati

Re: frozen approved review

2019-03-17 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On dimanche 17 mars 2019 19:55:19 CET Didier Fabert wrote: > Hi all, > > My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since > a week now. What is the next step ? > I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or > packaging-guidelines[3]. > > Thanks for your repl

Re: state of fedora-review?

2019-03-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > I've got a COPR based on the devel branch: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/fedora-review/ > fedora-review 0.7.0 has been released and updates have been proposed for Fedora: Fedora 30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.

Re: Sphinx and xindy

2019-03-17 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:49 PM Jerry James wrote: > The clisp issue with s390x has been on my TODO list for a long time. > I've been using most of my Fedora time to hunt down bugs that keep > other packages from building at all. I seem to be reaching the end of > that, at last, so I'll try to fi

Re: Sphinx and xindy

2019-03-17 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Well I meant TeX docs with Sphinx. > But obviously even that could be wrong, that's why I've used the words "think" > and "much". Ah, sorry for the misread. No, I think you are correct. Sphinx seems to be used mostly to build HTML documenta

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 03. 19 22:19, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates == Summary == We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in rawhide. This will reduce the amount of broken dependency, uninstallable packages and broken composes lea