Re: Is dnf update --releasever=30 supposed to work with modules?

2019-03-04 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:56:26AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:30 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > Bonus question: Are "Problem 1" (etc) in each section of the error > > message supposed to relate to each other in some way? Or is the > > second list a new list of problems? >

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 03:05:56PM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: >On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 3:20 PM Ben Cotton <[1]bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > ** infrastructure: deploy the new version of bodhi and the new koji > plugin > >What's the new Koji plugin? Good catch, this is a left over fr

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 3/1/19 1:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates > > > ...snip... > > > # Add tests to a package you maintain in Fedora using the [[ > > CI/Quick_Start_Guide ]] document

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 02. 03. 19 v 8:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 16:19 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates >> >> == Summary == >> We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in >> rawhide. This will reduce t

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 02. 03. 19 v 8:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 16:19 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates > >> > >> == Summary == > >> We want to gate pack

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Petr Šabata
Replying in general. While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the current situation that would mean no modules being available. Once/if we proceed with one of the modules-in-the-non-modular-buildroot proposals, I w

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Petr Šabata
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:25:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me... > > I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but > I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it > lets you use dep

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

2019-03-04 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
+1, I agree with proposed text. On 2/28/19 10:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I just realized I only responded to Zdenek the other day. Re-sending > my response now. > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:13 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> comments are in the text: >> >> On 2/11/19 9:17 PM, Steph

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > Replying in general. > > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs > to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the current > situation that would mean no modules being available. I don't understa

Schedule for today's FESCo meeting (2019-03-04)

2019-03-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-03-04 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > Replying in general. > > > > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs > > to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the current

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > > Replying in general. > > > > > > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock config

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 11:12 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Replying in general. > > > > > > > > While it'

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:11:48AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Replying in general. > > > > > >

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Adam Samalik
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Replying in general. > > > > > > > > Whil

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 05:22, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, March 4, 2019 11:21:05 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > I suggested to drop the modular repo from the mock config to get > an environment similar to what we have in koji. It is disabled here anyways: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/ 65d87447c44e0a4ae628306b701b9d805fed

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 11:41 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2019 11:21:05 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote: > > I suggested to drop the modular repo from the mock config to get > > an environment similar to what we have in koji. > > It is disabled here anyways: > https://github.com/rpm-software

Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

2019-03-04 Thread Sundeep Anand
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: > >> Hi Dominik, >> >> Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a >> package, the package is to be added in Transtats, 'mkvtoolnix' >> So, dry run of jobs (you

Re: transtats.fedoraproject.org is live now!

2019-03-04 Thread Sundeep Anand
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:17 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Happy to announce that Transtats[1] (v0.1.6) is now deployed in > production[2]. > Please follow quick writeup[3] for getting started. > Just to update: latest release *0.7.0* has been deployed in production. Major changes in

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:45:31AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 03. 19 22:19, Ben Cotton wrote: > > '''The CI system, the tests and the decision on which tests are used > > to gate upon are out of scope for the present document.''' > > This is both good (specifying explicitly what is this c

Self introduction: Barry Scott

2019-03-04 Thread Barry Scott
I have become the new maintainer for the pysvn package on Fedora. I am the upstream developer for a number of projects including: * pysvn - https://pysvn.sourceforge.io/ * pycxx - http://cxx.sourceforge.net/ * Barry's Emacs - http://barrys-emacs.org/ * SCM workbench - http://scm-workbench.barrys-e

Re: Broken modules on rawhide

2019-03-04 Thread Barry Scott
I see the same messages and its from a mock build. How does this relate to upgrades? Barry > On 27 Feb 2019, at 11:30, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > Why people disable the repo, I do not know. I might have a slight notion. > > However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular

[Bug 1684873] perl-Iterator-Simple-Lookahead-0.09 is available

2019-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684873 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: F29 System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries

2019-03-04 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > On 07/17/2018 04:08 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:24:04 PM CEST Matus Honek wrote: >>> Florian is right, the idea is to make changes to the source code >>> (probably a downstream patch will be needed) such that the threaded >>> library will be built twic

Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

2019-03-04 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: Hi Dominik, Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a package, the package is to be added in Transtats, 'mkvtool

Re: Self introduction: Barry Scott

2019-03-04 Thread Vascom
Hi and welcome. I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package. You should suggest new package for that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Also you can send Pull Requests or talk with python-pycxx maintainer directly. пн, 4 ма

Re: Self introduction: Barry Scott

2019-03-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 03. 19 13:14, Vascom wrote: Hi and welcome. I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package. You should suggest new package for that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers That's not entirely true. See https://fedoraproj

Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

2019-03-04 Thread Sundeep Anand
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Dominik, > >>> > >>> Thank you so much trying that

Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

2019-03-04 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote: On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Alexander Bokovoy >Transtats is now running at https://transtats.fedoraproject.org >*mkvtoolnix* page: >https://transtats.fedoraproject.org/packages/view/mkvtoolnix How can I modify the definition of a package I added t

Re: libravatar is in fedorainfracloud!

2019-03-04 Thread Michal Schorm
Any idea how to use it? The: https://src.fedoraproject.org/settings#nav-basic-tab has an option to change the avatar. That will redirect me to: https://www.libravatar.org/account/login/ I have an image uploaded in: https://www.libravatar.org/accounts/profile/ But I found no way to somehow "apply

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me... > > I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but > I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it > lets you use dependencies th

F30 Beta freeze and Bodhi activation point are scheduled in 7.5 hours time

2019-03-04 Thread Kalev Lember
A quick heads up that the F30 Beta freeze starts tonight. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct

GNOME 3.31.92 megaupdate and the F30 Beta freeze

2019-03-04 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi all, It's GNOME 3.31.92 release this week. We have a f30-gnome side tag as usual; if you are helping with builds please do F30 builds with 'fedpkg build --target f30-gnome'. I'll collect all the builds from the side tag and submit a megaupdate to Bodhi later this week. It's also F30 Beta fre

Tuesday's Modularity Team Meeting is cancelled (2019-03-05)

2019-03-04 Thread Nils Philippsen
Due to scheduling conflicts we estimate that attendance at the Modularity Team Meeting would be low, so we've decided to cancel it. Unless something unexpected happens, the regular meeting schedule will resume next week. Nils -- Nils Philippsen"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to Sof

Re: Qt 5.12 coming to rawhide

2019-03-04 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > Continuing work in master branch (aka fc31) The bulk of this work is now complete, sans a handful of leaf packages. Feel free to poke me if additional help is needed for those. work in f30-kde koji target will continue -- Rex __

Scratch build uploads to koji VERY SLOW

2019-03-04 Thread Richard Shaw
Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and it doesn't appear to be on my end. I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's very painful. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Scratch build uploads to koji VERY SLOW

2019-03-04 Thread Christian Dersch
On 3/4/19 6:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and > it doesn't appear to be on my end. > > I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's > very painful. Yes, same here. Greetings, Christian ___

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned? > > Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating. > Maybe that term is overloaded. The way I see it there are two ways to opt-out: > - remo

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates

2019-03-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:11:27AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > >> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned? > > > > Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating. > > Maybe that t

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:36 AM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me... >> >> I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but I >> *STILL* don't really understand mod

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 3/1/19 8:25 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me... I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it lets you use dependencies that aren't availab

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

2019-03-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 3/4/19 3:04 AM, Petr Šabata wrote: You can view them as virtual repositories with dependencies. I think that might be the simplest way to put it. You can try playing with fedmod to generate your modulemd file or you can just write it from scratch; it's not all that complicated. Why should

Summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2019-03-04)

2019-03-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-04/fesco.2019-03-04-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-04/fesco.2019-03-04-15.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-04/fesco.2019-03-04-15.00.lo

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-03-04 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, March 04 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): >> Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on >> $releasever? > > For the record - we are speaking about: > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 > > I spoke to DNF te

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-03-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 08:47 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on > > $releasever? > > For the record - we are speaking about: > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 > > I sp

Re: libravatar is in fedorainfracloud!

2019-03-04 Thread Michal Novotny
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:26 PM Michal Schorm wrote: > > Any idea how to use it? > > The: https://src.fedoraproject.org/settings#nav-basic-tab > has an option to change the avatar. > That will redirect me to: https://www.libravatar.org/account/login/ > > I have an image uploaded in: https://www.lib

Re: libravatar is in fedorainfracloud!

2019-03-04 Thread Michal Schorm
This is what confused me: My profile is names after my email address. So I entirely ignored the button "add new email address", because I thought it must be obvious for the service. Works fine, thanks for the clarification! For the second part: seems fixed now. It was 100% reproducible for me

Re: libravatar is in fedorainfracloud!

2019-03-04 Thread Michal Novotny
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:06 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > > This is what confused me: > My profile is names after my email address. > So I entirely ignored the button "add new email address", because I > thought it must be obvious for the service. Ah, right. Glad it works now! > > Works fine, th