On 2019-01-23, Petr Pisar wrote:
> This change is implemented in pcre2-10.32-6.fc30 and pcre-8.42-7.fc30.
>
> For applications to take the benefit of this change, they need to be
> rebuilt. I will perform the rebuild in Rawhide. These packages are
> possible affected:
>
> cyrus-imapd
Already built
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Wayland_By_Default_On_Gnome
== Summary ==
Firefox is going to run natively on Gnome Wayland session and won't
use XWayland/X11 Gtk+ backend. This change affects Gnome only and
won't be enabled for other Wayland compositors (KDE Plasma, Sway).
== Owne
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bash_5.0
== Summary ==
Upgrade bash to 5.0 release. This release fixes several outstanding
bugs in bash-4.4 and introduces several
new features. The most significant bug fixes are an overhaul of how
nameref variables resolve and a number of potential out-of
Why is this Self-Contained Change and not a System Wide Change?
It seems, at least to me, that it should be System Wide Change, according
to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Complex_system_wide_changes
.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:45 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:43:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Wayland_By_Default_On_Gnome
>
> == Summary ==
> Firefox is going to run natively on Gnome Wayland session and won't
> use XWayland/X11 Gtk+ backend. This change affects Gnome only and
> won
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
> Why is this Self-Contained Change and not a System Wide Change?
>
> It seems, at least to me, that it should be System Wide Change, according to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Complex_system_wide_changes .
>
Is it r
With enormous thanks to Denis Arnaud for doing the actual boost.spec
rebase, we're ready to update Boost in rawhide, for this change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F30Boost169
As always, this changes the soname of every libboost_*.so library, so
we'll be rebuilding all the packages that
On 2019-01-22 8:17 a.m., Serge Guelton wrote:
>
> Hi Luya,
>
> Clang does not support the -fstack-clash-protection flag. We used to silently
> ignore that flag but it's no longer the case.
> Why are you using clang to compile the package? The safe step is to use gcc,
> ot if clang is needed, to s
On 25/01/19 08:36 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2019-01-22 8:17 a.m., Serge Guelton wrote:
Hi Luya,
Clang does not support the -fstack-clash-protection flag. We used to silently
ignore that flag but it's no longer the case.
Why are you using clang to compile the package? The safe step is
On 22/01/19 08:52 +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
Hi,
Ben Cotton wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:16:56PM -0500:
== Detailed Description ==
GCC 9 is currently in stage4 since January 7th, in prerelease state
with only regression bugfixes and documentation fixes allowed. The
release will happe
Just out of curiosity, is firewalld going to nftables, like rhel8? Apparently,
this change was not submitted on time for f29, so just wondering what's going
to happen with f30.
--
Bojan
Original Message
From: Ben Cotton
Sent: 25 January 2019 1:02:54 am AEDT
To: devel-annou.
I hope this gets fixed before FF on Wayland becomes the only option:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666410
It makes FF really difficult to use with menus drawn off screen.
--
Bojan
Original Message
From: Ben Cotton
Sent: 26 January 2019 1:43:32 am AEDT
To: dev
I'm working on moving FreeCAD to Python 3 but a handful of dependences need
updates to make it work.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code o
On 25/01/19 14:53 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on moving FreeCAD to Python 3 but a handful of dependences need
updates to make it work.
OK, thanks. I won't try to "fix" it to use the new library name
libboost_python27.so then.
___
devel mai
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:43:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Wayland_By_Default_On_Gnome
>
> == Summary ==
> Firefox is going to run natively on Gnome Wayland session and won't
> use XWayland/X11 Gtk+ backend. This change affects Gnome only and
> won
On 25/01/2019 21:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:43:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firefox_Wayland_By_Default_On_Gnome
== Summary ==
Firefox is going to run natively on Gnome Wayland session and won't
use XWayland/X11 Gtk+ backend.
On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 12:19, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to focus my rather limited free time on neurofedora[1].
> So, I'd like to pass on a number of packages that I no longer use to
> maintainers who would give them the required attention.
>
> A few of them were inactiv
On 2019-01-25 9:02 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> Upstream reason. Trying to build with gcc will fail. See the attacked
>> CMakeLists.txt from ispc-1.10.0
>
> That says it wants to build with clang, but doesn't say why building
> with GCC will fail. Is it due to a GCC bug? Is it something we can
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in updates-20190125.0):
ID: 347909 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/347909
ID: 347910 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso in
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
ID: 347911 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/347911
ID: 347912 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
