Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21. 01. 19 23:42, Ben Cotton wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I think we want this to go through. The new version is already packaged and I know some work has been done to resolve compilation failures. There's still plenty of time to resolve the rema

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:02:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This is already happening, gcc was updated, I see bugs for gcc 9 related > FTBFS being open. This is not a proper way to coordinate this kind of thing. I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this year and

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Montag, den 21.01.2019, 15:16 -0500 schrieb Ben Cotton: > * Proposal owners: > Build gcc in f30, rebuild packages that have direct dependencies on > exact gcc version (libtool, annobin, gcc-python-plugin). Did not happen. Rawhide buildroot was broken yesterday around 9:50 UTC. I was doing the

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 01. 19 10:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:02:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: This is already happening, gcc was updated, I see bugs for gcc 9 related FTBFS being open. This is not a proper way to coordinate this kind of thing. I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190121.0

2019-01-22 Thread noreply
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190121.0 Commit(x86_64): cdcbea2ccac7804770be806befd30895457de080d1525ee6050a5bebdfeefeb7 Commit(aarch64): 327fc6d2c7c8dc44733b6cfa5e8db3711ba15a46022862688427b162cd55d9cf Commit(ppc64le): 2169d9961bce21578367d145c

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch > gcc 9 rpms. I believe Carlos has been mentioning GCC when F30 mass rebuild > has

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ti, 22 tammi 2019, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch gcc 9 rpms. I believe Carlos has been m

Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread Dario Lesca
Hi, I would like to try to use un my Asus notebook with Fedora 29 this ASUS USB3.0 HZ-3 Docking Station https://www.asus.com/it/Laptops-Accessories/ASUS_USB30_HZ3_Docking_Station/ For Linux I have found this driver: https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/ But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro!

Ruby soname bump

2019-01-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, We have Ruby 2.6 ready in side tag and we are about to merge the changes back to Rawhide [1]. Therefore I just want to give heads up that although we rebuilt most of the packages due to libruby soname bump, there might still be some breakage. You can find the list of packages with know issue i

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread John Harris
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like other > mentioned in this page is: "Linux"! ... not "Ubuntu" S.O? > > Ubuntu is Linux, Linux is not Ubuntu! Ubuntu includes Linux, yes. > This is very irritating ... Why n

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
> Hi, I would like to try to use un my Asus notebook with Fedora 29 this ASUS > USB3.0 HZ-3 Docking Station > https://www.asus.com/it/Laptops-Accessories/ASUS_USB30_HZ3_Docking_Station/ > > For Linux I have found this driver: > https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/ > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O,

Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2019-01-22)

2019-01-22 Thread Nils Philippsen
Sorry that this one's a little late, scheduling snafu... Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net. To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the Fedor

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread Luis Manuel Segundo
Hello Dario, you can download the necessary driver for your Fedora from this address https://github.com/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/releases and then run the RPM with this command e.g. sudo dnf install fedora-29-displaylink-1.5.1-1.x86_64.rpm Regards _

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190121.0

2019-01-22 Thread Sinny Kumari
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:54 AM wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190121.0 > Commit(x86_64): > cdcbea2ccac7804770be806befd30895457de080d1525ee6050a5bebdfeefeb7 > Commit(aarch64): > 327fc6d2c7c8dc44733b6cfa5e8db3711ba15a46022862688427b

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno mar, 22/01/2019 alle 09.24 -0500, John Harris ha scritto: > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like > > othermentioned in this page is: "Linux"! ... not "Ubuntu" > > S.O? Opss! I meant O.S. (Operating S

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread John Harris
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:35:46 AM EST Luis Manuel Segundo wrote: > Hello Dario, you can download the necessary driver for your Fedora from this > address https://github.com/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/releases and > then run the RPM with this command > e.g. > sudo dnf install fedora-29-

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread John Harris
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:46:44 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno mar, 22/01/2019 alle 09.24 -0500, John Harris ha scritto: > > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like > > > othermentioned in this page i

Re: Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2019-01-22)

2019-01-22 Thread Nils Philippsen
...and it was cancelled because the usually attending people are on travels. On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 15:33 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Sorry that this one's a little late, scheduling snafu... > > Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the > Fedora Modularity Working Gr

Re: Attempt to update ispc

2019-01-22 Thread Serge Guelton
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:36:22AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > Upstream ispc updated to 1.10.0.  Unfortunately, the build failed with > broken clang++ compiler according to koji   > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32150411) > > Can someone investigate th

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

2019-01-22 Thread Germano Massullo
I reply to your message in the bottom part, just let me explain how I got this situation, because my previous message lacked of informations. I have built and installed a new BOINC release with a systemd unit file patch, and I have noticed that the service behaviour has not changed. Therefore I

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

2019-01-22 Thread Igor Gnatenko
And ldconfig part is done. I'll remove other scriptlets this/next week. On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:32 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/needless-scriptlets.txt > > Here's the list of packages which have dependency on /sbin/ldconfig > with their respective maintain

No rawhide Labs

2019-01-22 Thread Fabian Affolter
Hi all, I'm looking at this page [1] and all builds for the Live media are failing. Currently we have not a single Lab which is building and Fedora 30 is already on the way. The mirror seems to have only the Spins. So, the result on the mentioned page are up-to-date. For the Security Lab I made

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

2019-01-22 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, an official package for the displaylink driver would be awesome. Upstream or the manufacturer of this docking stations with external gpu (plugged via USB-C) seems to care about Ubuntu only as there are official builds for this distribution only. Another problem is that not everything in th

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

2019-01-22 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 1/22/19 8:45 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: I have never placed BOINC systemd unit file in /etc/systemd/system but I am wondering if "systemctl edit --full" can trigger the creation of such files under this folder Yes. The /usr/lib/systemd location is for the original packaged unit files. M

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

2019-01-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:45:48PM -, Germano Massullo wrote: > I reply to your message in the bottom part, just let me explain how I got > this situation, because my previous message lacked of informations. > > I have built and installed a new BOINC release with a systemd unit file > patch,

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Martin Kolman
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > > year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch > > gcc 9 rpms. I b

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

2019-01-22 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > > > year and only realized that whe