LMGTFY (fedora review swap )
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/
This review ends with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546
| Fedora Update System 2010-03-23 23:30:09 UTC
| telepathy-sunshine-0.
On Saturday, January 12, 2019 2:27:33 AM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just as a note, Workstation isn't a spin, it's a Fedora Edition:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Editions
>
> framing it as if it's "just another spin" is a bit off. Its prominence
> is quite intentional and the whole Fedora
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> > LMGTFY (fedora review swap )
> >
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/
> >
> >
>
> This review ends with
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 11:18 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM J. Scheurich wrote:
> >
> > > LMGTFY (fedora review swap )
> > >
> > >
> > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/
> > >
Asking for a review swap is usually done as a
post to this very "devel" mailing list, and it includes the package
name, bugzilla link, and which kinds of packages you can review in
return.
package name: wdune (whitr_dune)
bugzilla link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31977446
This has been sitting with a "free" s390 job for about 4-5 hours.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:16:12 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31977446
>
> This has been sitting with a "free" s390 job for about 4-5 hours.
There is an announce outage in the Boston lab that hosts the mainframe,
it will last till Monday
I assume you missed the following announcement? It was posted to @devel
twice.
Fabio
---
Planned Outage - Koji Services - 2019-01-11 22:00 UTC
There will be an koji outage starting at 2019-01-11 22:00 UTC, which
will last approximately 4 days.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:03:57 -0500
From: Stephen John Smoogen
To: Fedora Infrastructure ,
Development discussions related to Fedora
,
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system
2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14
This is a reminder that this
Dan Horák wrote:
> This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will probably be in
> place for 4 days. If there are increased downtimes, we will update the
> data when we know it.
4 whole DAYS of Koji outage are absolutely unacceptable!
This just shows how bad an idea it was to add those
On 11. 01. 19 16:21, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Any chance you would have this ready in some copr?
I'd like to test if Python builds and passes the tests, the
replacement in F28
wasn't without problems IIRC.
A COPR with builds of bumped libxcrypt so-name and all recently
supported versions
John Harris wrote:
> Really, the issue there is specifically that it isn't "just another spin",
+1
This pointless artificial distinction between "Editions" and "Spins" needs
to stop (because there is no technical difference whatsoever between the 2
concepts), as does the unfair advertising ("Ed
On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dan Horák wrote:
This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will probably be in
place for 4 days. If there are increased downtimes, we will update the
data when we know it.
4 whole DAYS of Koji outage are absolutely unacceptable!
This just sho
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 04:37, John Harris wrote:
> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 2:27:33 AM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Just as a note, Workstation isn't a spin, it's a Fedora Edition:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Editions
> >
> > framing it as if it's "just another spin" is a bit of
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:12:47PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 22:40 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >
> >> But to be fair, MIT krb5 is not known for having great error output.
> >> Not being able to start at all because the K/M has an e
On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Dan Horák wrote:
>>> This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will probably be in
>>> place for 4 days. If there are increased downtimes, we will update the
>>> data when we know it.
>>
>> 4 whole DAYS
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Side note, I was at a loss of what you were getting at. There were several
> ways it could be interpreted and has been used by people in the past to
> mean different things.
I think John's statement was pretty clear: The artificial distinction
between "Editions" and
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - Since this is your first package, you as a *packager* have to be
> sponsored by a "proven packager".
No, by a packager sponsor.
Those are 2 orthogonal concepts: There are sponsors that are not
provenpackagers and there are provenpackagers that are not sponsors.
(Only
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent for the agenda.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Note we also only have a few proposed blockers and mos
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:37 PM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 1/8/19 4:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > If all you want to do is count, then it should be entirely sufficient
> > to do it like this:
> >
> >GET /metalink?repo=fedora-28&arch=x86_64&edition=&countme=1
> > HTTP/1.1
> >
> > th
On 1/12/19 7:24 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Writing this into the dnf behavior is typical, but i't's not
beneficial to the clients. It's beneficial to the mirrors, who are
likely to sell the data. While it may be that infamous problem, a
"Simple Matter Of Programming(tm)" to sanitize the data, t
21 matches
Mail list logo
