Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to
tracking
measures. We don't want to track; just count.
Uh, so what's the stor
Hi
I had a new package approved yesterday (perl-App-ccdiff) and I've
built packages for F29/rawhide. Bodhi doesn't know about the new
package yet, though, so I can't submit a new package update for F29.
How long does it normally take for Bodhi to start recognising a
newly-created package?
Thanks
On 09. 01. 19 11:20, Richard Fearn wrote:
Hi
I had a new package approved yesterday (perl-App-ccdiff) and I've
built packages for F29/rawhide. Bodhi doesn't know about the new
package yet, though, so I can't submit a new package update for F29.
How long does it normally take for Bodhi to start
Matthew Miller wrote:
...
> > Update GNOME to the latest upstream release, 3.32.
>
> Does this release feature the new lockscreen Allan Day was working on?
It doesn't include that feature so far. There's a month until GNOME's
UI freeze, so there's still time, but I wouldn't count on the feature
l
Hello,
AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
interested in setting up a team to work on it?
Have a nice day
[1]: https://rocm.github.io/
___
> It won't autocomplete the package name and build or it refuses to create the
> update?
It won't autocomplete.
Rich
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:12:35AM +, Richard Fearn wrote:
> > It won't autocomplete the package name and build or it refuses to create
> > the update?
>
> It won't autocomplete.
Just type or paste the full build name.
Zbyszke
___
devel mailing li
> Just type or paste the full build name.
That worked - thanks!
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fec6d2d48
Still curious as to how long it might take for Bodhi to recognise it
properly though...
Rich
--
Richard Fearn
richardfe...@gmail.com
_
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > We can certainly implement a setup that does not collect or store the
> > UUID together with the IP address or timestamp. Send the UUID as a
> > HTTP header, don't log it, send the UUID off to a counting service
> > (*). If we make
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:45:16 AM EST Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
>
> > On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>
> * The Fedora community cares about privacy a
* Peter Robinson:
>> > Not if we don't keep them for long. One idea is to rotate them fairly
>> > frequently. But this is mostly a statement of intent and might be more
>> > about
>> > how we build the backend than about what we force in the client.
>>
>> My understanding is that the Fedora proje
On 1/9/19 4:45 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit :
On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
* The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
measures. We don't want to
I'd like to orphan dnsyo. It has one bug open to fix the fact that it
requires both python2 and python3 right now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314043
There's also a PR that was sent to address this, but I haven't had
time to look at it and merge it.
-re
__
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:46:34AM +, Allan Day wrote:
> > > Update GNOME to the latest upstream release, 3.32.
> > Does this release feature the new lockscreen Allan Day was working on?
> It doesn't include that feature so far. There's a month until GNOME's
> UI freeze, so there's still time,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting
One of the nice things about Netatalk is that it fully emulates an Apple Time
Machine Volume. Mac clients don't know the difference. This is in contrast to
emulating a time machine volume through NFS. Using NFS for time machine backups
does not have quite the same user experience. That might not
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:38:07PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Nb. “UUID” sounds terribly technical. Can we use some term which
> is already known and understood by users, e.g. Advertising ID?
Well, it very much is not an "advertising ID", so not that.
But I think we're going to explore the no
Il 1/9/19 1:23 PM, Richard Fearn ha scritto:
>> Just type or paste the full build name.
> That worked - thanks!
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fec6d2d48
>
> Still curious as to how long it might take for Bodhi to recognise it
> properly though...
>
Actually, Bodhi relies o
Greetings again!
In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg integration in the
web interface:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2913
I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
i
From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the "Multiple
packages with the same base name" section
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name)
seems to contradict the "Separators" section
(https:/
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:59:38PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Greetings again!
>
> In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
> maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg integration in the
> web interface:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2019, 18:07 + schrieb
jd...@penguincomputing.com:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section (
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_package
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:07 +, jd...@penguincomputing.com wrote:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_
Somehow I completely missed that next line. Thank you for pointing it out.
The docs are correct. Sorry for the noise.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Co
> Björn 'besser82' Esser writes:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
Please see the relevant guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_nam
Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
== Summary ==
Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja t
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 19:07:09 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:59:38PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Greetings again!
> >
> > In my quest to kill Bodhi features so I can have a smaller codebase to
> > maintain, I am considering getting rid of the fedmsg integ
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>
> == Summary ==
> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langp
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 11:50 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting up a t
Randy Barlow wrote:
> I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
> if others thought it was useful. So, do you find it useful?
I just find those notifications annoying and pointless. This feature could
possibly be useful if it were filtered so that only activities relev
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
This had been the practice for years until some pedant decided that the dot
was absolutely indispensable. So they changed it.
Kevin Kofler
On 01/09/2019 02:50 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting up a team to work
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-01-10 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-01-10 04:00 PST US/Pacific
2019-01-10
crossposting devel@ and kernel@ since it's both kernel and documentation related
I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
And when I follow that, c
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30!
> >
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_Wi
On 1/9/19 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
And when I follow that, copy/pasting the perl script is stomping
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:31:38PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > Do you plan to remove the comps groups? And if yes, in F30 or later?
>
> Yes, Plan is to remove language support group entries from comps fil
37 matches
Mail list logo
