OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 594.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/131 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181201.n.0):
ID: 314896 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/314896
ID: 314908 Test: x86_64
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow again. We
still don't have anything very urgent to discuss, and Brno folks will
not be around.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
--
Ada
Hello,
While packaging software for NeuroFedora[1], we've got quite a few
MATLab toolboxes that are commonly used in scientific research on our
list. SPM[2] is a good example. It is *widely* used in NeuroImaging
research. While it is somewhat compatible with Octave, upstream does not
support it[3]
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While packaging software for NeuroFedora[1], we've got quite a few
> MATLab toolboxes that are commonly used in scientific research on our
> list. SPM[2] is a good example. It is *widely* used in NeuroImaging
> research. While it is somewhat compatible with Octave,
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> While packaging software for NeuroFedora[1], we've got quite a few
> MATLab toolboxes that are commonly used in scientific research on our
> list. SPM[2] is a good example. It is *widely* used in NeuroImaging
> research. While it is somewhat compatible with Octave, upstream doe
On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
> https://fedoraproj
So we ship a jenkins in F29 at least that is broken on install due to
what looks like an incompatability with dom4j.
Upstream it looks like jenkins via stapler-jelly uses a fork of dom4j,
and the standard dom4j shipped in Fedora doesn't work the same.
There have been bugs filed, but nobody seems
30.11.2018, 01:58, "Matthew Miller" :
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:57:33PM +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>> https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe (various packages are available:
>> AppImage, Snap, Flatpak, Docker, RPM, etc.). The tool is intended to
>
> Have you considered packaging this direct
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 5:55 AM David Airlie wrote:
>
> So we ship a jenkins in F29 at least that is broken on install due to
> what looks like an incompatability with dom4j.
>
> Upstream it looks like jenkins via stapler-jelly uses a fork of dom4j,
> and the standard dom4j shipped in Fedora doesn'
10 matches
Mail list logo