Dne 11.9.2018 v 21:26 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?
Obviously:
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/
Hi,
What type of printer do you want to add (ethernet/usb/wifi)? I tried to
add ethernet and usb types in my clean F29 virtual machine and both worked.
If the printer is usb or it is in the same network as your PC, then you
should see it in CUPS web api when you try to add new printer (on
localho
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm new on this list. I work on Qubes OS, where Fedora is used as a base
> > distribution.
> >
> > While trying to build the installation image i
I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
freeze, will these get pushed prior to release? I'd hoped so.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dba61d0d49
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5c15f3cff6
-- Rex
__
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
> freeze, will these get pushed prior to release? I'd hoped so.
>
Freeze was entered at 2018-10-09 00:00 UTC.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dba6
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
>> freeze, will these get pushed prior to release? I'd hoped so.
>>
>
> Freeze was entered at 2018-10-09 00:00 UTC.
Ok, that's much earlie
On 10/12/2018 03:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
freeze, will these get pushed prior to release? I'd hoped so.
Freeze was entered at 2018-10-09 00:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 10:05, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2018 03:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
> >>> freeze, will these get
Hi, my name is Casper.
I am a software developer by trade and in my free time I am developing
an open-source application [1].
During the development I noticed that the library I use (KDSoap) is not
available in Fedora. I want to contribute to Fedora by packaging this
library and later the appli
Dear all,
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 07:38 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:23:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > fwiw, I just ran into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632177
> > > after a dnf system-upgrade and it crashed at least the dnf
> > > history/update/remove comm
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 16:04 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/12/2018 03:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've 2 bodhi updates that were submitted for batched/stable prior to the
> > > > freeze, wil
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 09:07 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 11.9.2018 v 21:26 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> > operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> > what you're seeing and any workarounds or fi
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:33 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 16:04 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 10/12/2018 03:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:39 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > > I've 2 bodhi updates that were su
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This is even more augmented for installer related updates that unlike
> > say Firefox fewer people are likely to be even able to test. Also it's
> > still not possible for maintainers with disjoint commit rights to submit
> > a sh
OLD: Fedora-29-20181011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hello,
A few years back there was a movement the NFS community
to consulate all nfs configuration into one file
call /etc/nfs.conf... See nfs.conf(5)
Maybe stupidly, I've maintain backwards compatibility
for that last couple Fedora releases. I think it is
time to go to the single file configurat
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:48 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> A few years back there was a movement the NFS community
> to consulate all nfs configuration into one file
> call /etc/nfs.conf... See nfs.conf(5)
>
> Maybe stupidly, I've maintain backwards compatibility
> for that last couple Fe
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> How can I help with the python3 transition?
I need some help after all. Cythonizing of src/sage/arith/long.pxd is
failing like so:
Error compiling Cython file:
...
from cpython.obj
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:20 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the huge piece of work!
> IIRC, there are a few math Go packages in the pipeline, that use *las
> too, not sure if they’ve reached rawhide yet or not (the guys who
> package them do not use the math stuff themselves, its just
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 7:33 AM Till Hofmann wrote:
> FYI: gazebo is currently FTBFS because player is FTBFS. I looked into
> player and fixed two smaller issues [1], but it's still FTBFS [2]. It
> looks like it's still requiring python2 but uses the default python3
> during build and then fails. S
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:12 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > This is even more augmented for installer related updates that unlike
> > > say Firefox fewer people are likely to be even able to test. Also it's
> > > still not possib
On 10/4/18 5:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update t
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure the original reason was the default live install use
>> dd to block copy the root file system into the fedora-root LV, and
>> then resized the LV a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 294742 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/294742
ID: 294756 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https:
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 15:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > I'm pretty sure the original reason was the default live install use
> > > dd to block copy the root
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:44:38PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Why does efiboot.img have a 32MiB limit?
> >
> > Because "32MB should be enough for everybody"
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:24:08PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>>> I'm pretty sure the original reason was the default live install use
>>> dd to block copy the root fil
On 10/12/18 9:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on
> Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
> information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
>
> View the meeting on Fedocal at
> htt
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 20:08 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> On 10/12/18 9:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on
> > Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
> > information, see: https://fedorapro
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 19:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 20:08 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > On 10/12/18 9:27 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Final release will be held on
> > > Thursday, 2018-10-18 at 17:00 UTC
31 matches
Mail list logo
