Yes - works for me, reliably, on a Dell XPS13 L322X - using F27/28. Was a
bit hickuppy in F27, but haven't had any issues with F28 that I can recall.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:39 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> We have had a long discussion about hibernate (suspend to
Does not work on Thinkpad x270 with F28 - kernel 4.18.10-200.
Ended up in terminal with cursor blinking (last thing I saw on start was
resuming from hibernation). I did manual reset after 20 minutes.
On 3.10.2018 17:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
We have had a long discussion about hi
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:20 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I have thus prepared this a few days ago:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10244
This is great, thank you.
So, any idea why they picked 1M? Are there typical apps that require
> really that many?
>
I've emailed Zebediah Fi
Maybe it will be also good to look at the SteamOS distribution and what
limits they are using.
On 8.10.2018 10:53, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:20 PM Lennart Poettering
mailto:mzerq...@0pointer.de>> wrote:
I have thus prepared this a few days ago:
https://github.com/s
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 11:09 AM Michal Konečný wrote:
> Maybe it will be also good to look at the SteamOS distribution and what
> limits they are using.
>
According to the proton document [1], SteamOS also has an increased fileno
hard limit. I haven't verified the actual value, but they probably
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:33:13AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I tried to enable suspension it works
> maybe once or twice, but then eventually the laptop fails to come
> out of suspended state no matter what, so I end up power-cycling it,
> then turning off suspension in power management, and
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:47:13PM +0200, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >Note: I'm not talking about the user-space configuration issues
> >(resume= not set on the kernel command line, no swap, swap encrypted
> >with temporary
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> > We have had a long discussion about hibernate (suspend to disk)
> > being unreliable. But there seems to be no hard data. Let's gather
> > some!
>
> I might have missed something, but can you link me the "long discussion"? Do
>
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 04:19:19PM -, Karlis Kalviskis wrote:
> * Panasonic Toughbook CF-19 with kernel 4.18.11-200.fc28.i686 _DOES NOT_ work
> as expected:
>
> - it pretends to save hibernation data and switches off.
> - when the computer starts, it begins to read the hibernation data, reb
On Monday, 08 October 2018 at 12:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:47:13PM +0200, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
[...]
> > Also, don't forget secure boot, kinda a big deal
> Yeah, secure boot kills the whole idea. One of the reason why I don't
> use secure boot. I
Various people replied, both here and on reddit [1]. Thank you all!
Short summary:
works (possibly with minor glitches): 27
works but with occasional regressions in some kernel versions: 3
unusable: 10
Results in tabular form:
zbyszek: Thinkpad x1c 4th gen: no issues
zbyszek: Thinkpad x1c 3rd ge
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 12:42:08PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 08 October 2018 at 12:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:47:13PM +0200, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> [...]
> > > Also, don't forget secure boot, kinda a big deal
> >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-08 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On 10/8/18 4:16 AM, Michal Konečný wrote:
> Does not work on Thinkpad x270 with F28 - kernel 4.18.10-200.
Nor does it work on Thinkpad x260 with F28 - same kernel
>
> Ended up in terminal with cursor blinking (last thing I saw on start
> was resuming from hibernation). I did manual reset after 20
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 28.20181007.0
Commit(x86_64): 8df48fa2e70ad1952153ae00edbba08ed18b53c3d4095a22985d1085f5203ac6
Commit(aarch64):
6b8d55e59750cfe8e490dbfa63ab12ccdb0a231a4d58e1b074793dddb6c49648
Commit(ppc64le):
4a95f167ee4063556daf59e13
Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle 2:31, Marek Kasik ha
scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and
have backport
Hi,
As fale has orphaned packages (
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TTRKFTADCEHAJSZ55YXIPT3DOZY5RTYW/
) I would like to take over rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf and some of its
dependencies.
I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855
Please let me
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:04 PM wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 28.20181007.0
> Commit(x86_64):
> 8df48fa2e70ad1952153ae00edbba08ed18b53c3d4095a22985d1085f5203ac6
> Commit(aarch64):
> 6b8d55e59750cfe8e490dbfa63ab12ccdb0a231a4d58e1b074793dd
Unbound is rebuilt on master.
Please bump and rebuild dependent packages.
On 10/02/2018 02:15 PM, Petr Mensik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am planning to push new unbound 1.8.0 into rawhide. It changes SONAME
> libunbound.so.2 to libunbound.so.8.
>
> Dependent packages are:
> asterisk
> getdns
> gnutls-d
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-08)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-08/fesco.2018-10-08-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
Hi all,
My thanks as well to Kamil for raising the question; it's been on my
list of things to do for a while.
The design of my patch set necessitates the allocation of one eventfd
descriptor for each kernel handle (which is, sort of, the Windows
equivalent of an fd) associated with a sync object
Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard limit of 1M open files per process
allows each process to eat at least 256MB (1M * sizeof(struct file)
[linux/fs.h]) of RAM. If a single user is allowed 1000 processes,
then that's 256GB of RAM, w
On 08/10/18 15:00, John Reiser wrote:
> Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
>
> Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard limit of 1M open files per process
> allows each process to eat at least 256MB (1M * sizeof(struct file)
> [linux/fs.h]) of RAM. If a single user is allo
On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote:
On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote:
Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard limit of 1M open files per process
allows each process to eat at least 256MB (1M * sizeof(struct file)
[linux/
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-10-09 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Branched 20181008.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 08/10/18 16:43, John Reiser wrote:
> On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>> On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote:
>>> Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
>>>
>>> Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard limit of 1M open files per
>>> process
>>> allows each proc
OLD: Fedora-29-20181005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181008.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 18
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 250
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 102.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:43.14 KiB
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 290770 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290770
ID: 290779 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraprojec
Hi all,
Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages
which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be
marked as 'stable' and included in the Final comp
30 matches
Mail list logo
