Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

* Todd Zullinger: > On the users list we enabled Mailman's DMARC mitigations > several months ago. That has allowed posts from users > @yahoo and other domains with strict DMARC settings to reach > list subscribers @gmail and other domains which honor those > DMARC settings. > > It may be worthwh

Fedora 29-20181005.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 290006 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/290006 ID: 290012 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje

Fedora Rawhide-20181005.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 18/133 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180930.n.0): ID: 289323 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/289323 ID: 289357 Test: x86_64 KDE-l

Self Introduction: John Ford

Hi, My name is John Ford and I'm looking to get back into working on Fedora. I have been a Fedora user since Version 8, though I've been using Red Hat since I found an out of date boxed copy of Red Hat Linux 5.2 at a book store. I've been involved in Fedora in the past, but it was a very long ti

Re: Self Introduction: John Ford

Welcome back john,its always good to have someone with experience. - Manas On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 7:21 PM John Ford wrote: > Hi, > > My name is John Ford and I'm looking to get back into working on Fedora. > I have been a Fedora user since Version 8, though I've been using Red Hat > since I found

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Branched 20181005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On 10/6/18 at 0124 UTC, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Branched_20181005.n.0_Summary The Downloads section https:/

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:12 PM Raphael Groner wrote: > > > On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 14:02:37 CEST Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > This is fancy and all, but could we have back a table of contents like in > > the > > Wiki. Some pages, like the main packaging one are very long and sometimes we >

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Hi, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Todd Zullinger: > >> On the users list we enabled Mailman's DMARC mitigations >> several months ago. That has allowed posts from users >> @yahoo and other domains with strict DMARC settings to reach >> list subscribers @gmail and other domains which honor those >> D

Re: hibernation — does it work for you?

* Dell Inspiron 1525 with kernel 4.8.13-100.fc23.x86_64 works as expected ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-con

Re: hibernation — does it work for you?

* Panasonic Toughbook CF-19 with kernel 4.18.11-200.fc28.i686 _DOES NOT_ work as expected: - it pretends to save hibernation data and switches off. - when the computer starts, it begins to read the hibernation data, reboots and start as normal power-on. Some funny data: # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:03 PM Björn Persson wrote: > >> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still >>> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package. >> >> Maybe I'll try that next t

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

* Todd Zullinger: > AFAIK, there's no individual subscriber control in Mailman. > It's applied to the list. (I'm nowhere close to an expert > with Mailman3 though, so corrections are welcome.) That's a pity (the lack of individual subscriber control I mean). > However, it only affects messages

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Branched 20181005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 07:30 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 10/6/18 at 0124 UTC, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download > > locations, and enter results on the Summary page: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fe

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Branched 20181005.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 16:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 07:30 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > On 10/6/18 at 0124 UTC, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > > > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download > > > locations, and enter results on the S

[Test-Announce] 2018-10-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-10-08 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. We have GNOME and dnf bugs, and one qemu

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said: > This really should be a configurable knob in Gmail, but currently, it is > not: Gmail rejects or drops such email occasionally, so you cannot fix > things with filters. Unfortunately, Google support does not understand > DMARC and that it's their systems w

Yet another gargantuan mathematical software update

Hi folks, It's about time for another "update the world" moment for some of the mathematical software we have in Fedora. I'm going to try to clear away a big chunk of my backlogged package work with this update, so it will be even bigger than usual. Primary goals are to switch from atlas or the