No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 32/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180924.n.2):
ID: 287032 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287032
ID: 287035 Test: x86_6
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> As directed by:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests
>
> I tried to add a test to libguestfs dist-git:
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/blob/master/f/tests/tests.yml
>
> It's very simple initially. It j
Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
There has been an outstanding update request since March 24, 2018.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560212
Joseph D. Wagner
__
* Joseph D. Wagner [01/10/2018 02:47] :
>
> Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
Folks, when you're asking us if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer,
you might want to consider actually giving us his name (
> On 1. Oct 2018, at 12:00, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Joseph D. Wagner [01/10/2018 02:47] :
>>
>> Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
>
> Folks, when you're asking us if anyone knows how to contact the m
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-01 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
I'm in meetings all day today and will be unable to attend the FESCo
meeting. I'll attempt to vote in all the tickets in today's agenda.
--
Jared Smith
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discusse
problem solved for my by adding the rsa key in paguera,
now i have access in fedorapeople also.
https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/first_steps.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
> "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
AS> such as these also be migrated?
Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
certainly be migrated in a similar fashion, but they wouldn't live in
the packaging c
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
>
> AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
> AS> such as these also be migrated?
>
> Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
> c
Good to know.
A good article post at Fedora Magazin will be more useful.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:24 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/NeuroFedora
>
> I've recently resurrected the NeuroFedora SIG. Many thanks to Igor and
> the others who'd worked on it in t
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
MH> heads up e-mails.
So that nobody is confused by this, the python2-matplotlib package was
previously an EPEL-only stub package maintained by me that existed so
packagers could simply depend
On 1.10.2018 17:32, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
MH> heads up e-mails.
So that nobody is confused by this, the python2-matplotlib package was
previously an EPEL-only stub package maintained by me
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 11:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 1.10.2018 17:32, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
> >
> > MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
> > MH> heads up e-mails.
> >
> > So that nobody is confused by this, the python2
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2 and python3 subpackages.
But recently it dropped support for python2.
What I don't und
Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:00:17 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-01/fesco.2018-10-01-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 15:00:20)
* #1974 Problematic blocker for F29: dnf 'offline' module
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2 and python3 subpackages.
But recently it
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 18:04:56 +0300, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> Good to know.
> A good article post at Fedora Magazin will be more useful.
Thanks! I intend to write a post on the community blog but I'm not sure
if NeuroFedora is mature enough to advertise to users on the magazine
just yet.
Hi,
naive noob question: Is it possible to execute scripts with taskotron to
download 3rd-party dependencies e.g. with pip from PyPi? I tend to say that
it's not worth to package simple test libraries with all the dependency hell
behind. Those dependencies are not required for normal runtime fu
On 1.10.2018 18:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2 and
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Seems that podman is broken (it is also broken for tibbs in some other
> way), this is really sad. Just wondering which version of fedora you are
> running and is there really no package called "slirp4netns" (I can see it
> in F28/F29/F30).
This was on Fedora 27. So one ne
On 09/30/2018 07:25 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30.9.2018 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Got this when I run `fedpkg new-sources`.
>>
>> $ fedpkg --release master new-sources wheel-0.32.0.tar.gz
>> Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns
>> status 403
>>
>> What do i nee
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch instead of using
a container. I would hope i
tl;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including
On 1.10.2018 20:00, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
- J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed
On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
contain good links to those pages on the wiki.
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to docs
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 16:27, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for pack
The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing
its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a
patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in
some instances.
Per
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsi
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:59:21PM -0400, John Florian wrote:
> On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling
> viewers they no
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen wrote:
> The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing
> its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a
> patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in
> some instances.
I'm around, b
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
a "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" feeling though.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
FWIW, We *could* use the asciidoctor / asciidoc plugin for jekyll.
Both asciidoctor and jekyl
John Florian wrote:
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
> they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
Björn Persson
pgpChXjsJJFLd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
l;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including a
On 2018-10-01 17:04, Björn Persson wrote:
John Florian wrote:
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
I would agree with that, but I read the announc
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
> a "best viewed
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is g
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> I'm wondering if it was a good idea to use asciidoc in the first
NG> place. Unlike reStructuredText, asciidoc implementations seem to be
NG> in very poor shape.
It's what the documentation team has chosen. I don't think the
packaging committee would want to
> "JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> I would agree with that, but I read the announcement as if this
JF> *was* finished.
The announcement was unfortunately made before things were in what I
would consider to be a "releasable" condition. Currently the Wiki pages
continue to exist and have not
OLD: Fedora-29-20180929.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages:11.81 MiB
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 16:52 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen <
> fedora201...@nuclearsunshine.com> wrote:
> > The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not
> > addressing
> > its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting
> > a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 287534 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287534
ID: 287551 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On 1.10.2018 19:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 18:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-ma
On 1.10.2018 23:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I h
45 matches
Mail list logo
