Hi,
On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their gi
Hi everybody,
There are many open bugs assigned to hguemar, which he is not
responding to at all. According to a quick bugzilla query, he doesn't
seem to have responded to any of the bugs assigned to him since
October 2017 (!).
Particularly important to me are the FTBFS reports for libgda, which
Hello,
gogoc is dead to the world upstream (the gogo6.com site is now a
nutritional supplement pusher!), and without gogo6's servers, gogoc is
fairly useless. It's still possible it could be used to TSP tunnel
through one's own servers to get IPv6, but as far as I know, there
aren't any more tunne
I should have added, it's currently FTBFS, and has been since F25, so
any potential adapters would have to deal with that. It needs at least a
BuildRequires removed or updated, and a patch for the printf change of
that time, so you'd have to be able to fix at least that much.
On 16/09/2018 11:15,
Le dim. 16 sept. 2018 à 11:27, Fabio Valentini a écrit :
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> There are many open bugs assigned to hguemar, which he is not
> responding to at all. According to a quick bugzilla query, he doesn't
> seem to have responded to any of the bugs assigned to him since
> October 2017 (!).
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.00 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
*first*,
As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in the policy.)
I think we should actually make this the step 0
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
>> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
>> *first*,
>
> As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
> as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in the policy.)
It does explicitl
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
>>> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
>>> *first*,
>>
>> As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
>> as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in th
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 280858 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280858
ID: 280874 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinsta
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180914.n.0):
ID: 280994 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280994
ID: 281003 T
On 16.9.2018 21:43, Rex Dieter wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
*first*,
As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in th
First time I've run into this...
Working on a new package and tried to install it only to get:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/67/7d4bdbbde390cc49fddb539cceb06ccb80efd6 from
install of ft8call-0.6.4-1.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
hamlib-3.2-1.fc28.x86_64
I have a Kerberos authentication problem.
On one computer running Fedora 27, I run kinit to authenticate to the
Fedora servers. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status
141. Then I run "fedpkg build", and get these error messages:
Kerberos authentication fails: (-1765328352, 'Ticket
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Working on a new package and tried to install it only to get:
>
> Error: Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/67/7d4bdbbde390cc49fddb539cceb06ccb80efd6 from
> install of ft8call-0.6.4-1.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from pack
Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Would *you* be interested in maintaining python2 past 2020, with no
> upstream support and 3415 dependent packages?
Yet, I just see NO practical alternative to SOMEBODY doing just that. It
just needs to be done, just as with GTK+ 1 and 2, and Qt 3 and 4. (Yes, all
those ar
On 18-09-16 17:53:08, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Kerberos authentication problem.
On one computer running Fedora 27, I run kinit to authenticate to the
Fedora servers. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status
141. Then I run "fedpkg build", and get these error messages:
Kerbero
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages
This policy is highly impractical. Any package can be deprecated without
notice, in some situations even without any kind of approval (if there is
nothing using it in Fedora yet). One needs to do a repoquery
OLD: Fedora-29-20180915.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 281187 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281187
ID: 281203 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https
> Le dim. 16 sept. 2018 à 11:27, Fabio Valentini écrit :
>
>
> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
> *first*, you never sent me an email or pinged me on irc.
> I don't like this kind of passive-aggressive approach, had you
> contacted me, we would have sorted this o
22 matches
Mail list logo
