Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On 09/08/2018 07:43 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: OK, builds done and the 3.30.0 megaupdate is in Bodhi now and queued for updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 Just as a quick heads up, this was accepted as a Freeze Exception in yesterday's blocker review m

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

You can pack kmods in copr , Fedora guidelines forbid kmods , I think , because they may be extremely insecure Sent from my AndroidEm 10/09/2018 7:44 da tarde, Simo Sorce escreveu: > > On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018

Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

Hi, I have to bring some bad news to you: I unfortunately have to orphan the qt5-qtwebengine package. As you can see from the changelog, I have not been able to dedicate any time to this package since March. (My last change was on 2018-03-18.) Yet, this package needs a lot of care, because of

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > kernel packages yes. but kmods? > > This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: > > "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material > (“Material”) that: > ... > violates any rules or guidelines of the F

Re: fedpkg clone doesn*t work

El lun, 10-09-2018 a las 14:58 +, Martin Gansser escribió: > every time I edit my account, the public ssh key is missing. > > the FSA public SSH-key and the key in .ssh/id_rsa.pub are the same. Can you ssh to fedorapeople.org? Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

On 09/10/18 11:26, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Just FTR current numbers about packages which requires python3 vs python2: # dnf repoquery -C --whatrequires python3| grep -cv i686; dnf repoquery -C --whatrequires python2| grep -cv i686 Last metadata expiration check: 0:59:03 ago on Mon 10 Sep 2018 18

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

On 09/11/2018 06:30 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> kernel packages yes. but kmods? >> >> This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: >> >> "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material >> (“Material”) tha

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

Kevin, Thanks for taking care of this package for so long. It's an exceptionally-challenging package that most maintainers would not be willing to touch, and your work was very much appreciated. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180911.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180911.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:14 Upgraded packages: 136 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.33 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Looking for whom to pass the vessel for maitaining youtube-dl

On samedi 8 septembre 2018 11:08:21 CEST Matěj Cepl wrote: > Hi, > > with change of my employer I don't use Fedora/RHEL for my > day-to-day work anymore and so I am loosing touch with the > actual state of packages here. Therefore, I would love to hand > over de facto maintainership of the yout

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

Kevin Kofler wrote: > I have to bring some bad news to you: I unfortunately have to orphan the > qt5-qtwebengine package. I thank you for all your efforts related this, very much appreciated. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

[modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd like to remove them all. Any objections? [1] https://github.com/modularity-modules/ -- Adam Šamalík --- Software Engineer

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 11:31 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > Kevin, > > Thanks for taking care of this package for so long. It's an > exceptionally-challenging package that most maintainers would not be > willing to touch, and your work was very much appreciated. +1! -- Adam Williamson Fed

Re: [modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

Go ahead On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period > we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd > like to remove them all. Any objections? > > [1] https://github.com/modularity-

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 16:48, Petr Viktorin wrote: [..] > These numbers hide an important fact: many things currently come with > RPMs for both python2 and python3. > > More detailed statistics (based on SRPMs, not binary RPMs): > http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/ > Graph with historical data: http://

Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

Hi folks! Around the time DNF 3 landed in Rawhide (hence F29), we had quite a few folks on these lists reporting issues, including crasher bugs. Many of these seemed somehow related to the DNF history database. They also were not easy to isolate and fix. We're now close to the F29 Beta release, b

Re: Managing stream (arbitrary) branch and module lifecycles

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:43 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > >> >> So... any comments to the concept? Any ideas about workflows or processes >> of managing the EOL values? >> > > Looking forward to this but I would say the devil is in the details. > P

Re: Managing stream (arbitrary) branch and module lifecycles

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:30 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:43 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > As a packager, what is your experience with lifecycles of your packages? > Do you get a specific EOL date from the upstream? If not, at what > circumstances you would retire an old version

Re: [modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Go ahead > > +1 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > >> We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period >> we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd >> like to

Fedora Rawhide-20180911.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180910.n.0): ID: 278231 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278231 ID: 278320 Test: x86_64 universal ins

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

On 09/11/18 11:52, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 16:48, Petr Viktorin > wrote: [..] These numbers hide an important fact: many things currently come with RPMs for both python2 and python3. More detailed statistics (based on SRPMs, not binar

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180911.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-29-20180910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:9.05 MiB Size of

Fedora 29-20180911.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 278492 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278492 ID: 278508 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinsta

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:26:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > Around the time DNF 3 landed in Rawhide (hence F29), we had quite a few > folks on these lists reporting issues, including crasher bugs. Many of > these seemed somehow related to the DNF history database. They also >

Re: fedpkg clone doesn*t work

isn't possible. [martin@f28 ~]$ ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa marti...@fedorapeople.org packet_write_wait: Connection to 152.19.134.199 port 22: Broken pipe ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.