> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same approach
TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would
love to learn.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 3:09 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar
> wrote:
> > Thank yo
OLD: Fedora-29-20180903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180905.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 9
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:35.27 MiB
Size of upg
Dear all,
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-09-13 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/
I'd like to brainstorm a bit about how to make kernel updates more
resilient to running out of disk space. I've talked to a few people on
IRC about this but I'm not at the point where I know enough to file good
bugs and figured that a larger discussion might help.
Summary of my questions:
Why i
Dear all,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 29
Beta Release Readiness meeting. This meeting will be held on Thursday,
2018-09-13 at 19:00 UTC.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
release of Fedora 29. Please note that this meeting will
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME update, but that
> > stopped, I assume because it felt like kind of rote bureaucracy rather than
> > helpful, since i
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > I don't think we should use "rawhide" to mean "rolling updates", because it
> > also has the implication of "project devel stream".
> Just to make sure we're on the same page: I was talking about specifying an
> EOL field, not a stre
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> > Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> > Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA here?
>
>
> If 3.29 is not what GNOME folks had ever wanted to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180904.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180906.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 295
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 206.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:14 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> My opinion, since there are few facts to go on to overcome the burden
>> stated in a written process and schedule for some time, is -1 FE. If
>> it was important enough to get 3.30 o
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 11:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> > > Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
>> > Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA her
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:13 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:14 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > My opinion, since there are few facts to go on to overcome the burden
> > > stated in a written process and schedule fo
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people
> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test.
> So I think it's reasonable for a GNOME specific change to explicitly
> state a request and expectation f
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:21:52PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:56 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:15:26PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> > > > mega-update. Th
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 20:42 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> Also, Fedora is much more than Workstation now. There is server,
> cloud, and other editions. We shouldn't circumvent our processes for
> some collection of packages important for one edition only.
There's no 'circumvention' being discu
On 09/05/2018 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). [...]
I don't know if it's a rea
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people
>> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test.
>> So I think it's reasonable for a GNOME spe
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:31 PM Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >>> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) confli
FWIW, rpm-ostree fixes all of this today - the entire update is really
transactional,
and fully handles hitting ENOSPC at any point.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people
> >> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test.
> >> So I think it's reasonable for
If you depend on pkgconfig one, then depending on environment you can get
different results ... Is there this what you are looking for?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 22:05 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:31 PM Przemek Klosowski <
> przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 09/05/
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:34 PM Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> If you depend on pkgconfig one, then depending on environment you can get
> different results ... Is there this what you are looking for?
>
No idea, as I can’t parse the sentence, sorry :-(
Could you try t
On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:33:20 -0700, you wrote:
>On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people
>> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test.
>> So I think it's reasonable for a GNOME specific chan
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 07:17:29PM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> >Uh, to be clear here: you do know that 3.29 is the development series
> >for 3.30, right? It's not a sudden major release jump. Effectively what
> >we have right now is more or less 3.30 rc0-and-a-bit; the proposal is
> >to go fro
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 275005 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275005
ID: 275015 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 33/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180904.n.0):
ID: 275452 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/275452
ID: 275514
I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of
graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final
pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's
definitely close enough to get started.
If you maintain a graphical application, plea
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I'd like to brainstorm a bit about how to make kernel updates more
> resilient to running out of disk space. I've talked to a few people on
> IRC about this but I'm not at the point where I know enough to file good
> bugs and figured t
Does anyone understand what most recent masher messages mean for F28 updates
testing?
bodhi masher failed to mash f28-updates-testing 3 hours agobodhi masher
successfully mashed f28-updates-testing 3 hours ago
Confusing...
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing
On 09/06/2018 08:05 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Does anyone understand what most recent masher messages mean for F28 updates
> testing?
>
> bodhi masher failed to mash f28-updates-testing 3 hours agobodhi masher
> successfully mashed f28-updates-testing 3 hours ago
> Confusing...
yeah, it seems:
On 6.9.2018 16:44, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> * The kernel could "pre-allocate" space in /var/tmp (by %ghosting a
> dummy nonzero-length file there) so that the package simply won't
> install if there isn't space sufficient to generate the initramfs.
> Would that be something we could reas
Hello ? No one interested ?
How do I move forward ?
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM Alain Vigne wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source
> tools, for a long time now.
>
> I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream
> http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> I'd like to invite Fedora contributors to start creating Flatpaks of
> graphical applications in Fedora. We're still working on putting the final
> pieces into place to have a complete story from end to end, but it's
> definitely close enoug
34 matches
Mail list logo
