Dne 4.9.2018 v 21:46 Rex Dieter napsal(a):
> Ben Rosser wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
every Fedora packager has to have installed
>>> I don't think that's true, can you expl
- Original Message -
> From: "Igor Gnatenko"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: developer-por...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:06:50 AM
> Subject: [Developer-portal] Re: New FDP release: Cassandra, Rust and many
> more [+statistics]
Hi,
I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given upstream
is more or less dead and latest release is more than 2 years old.
Feel free to take it.
Regards,
Jan
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:54:19AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
> >in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
> >against Fedora pa
On ke, 05 syys 2018, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:54:19AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
>in the packages they maintain. A complete
Hi All,
I'm Riccardo Schirone, I live in Italy and I've been a Fedora user for many
years. I joined Red Hat less than a year ago and I have been contributing
to radare2 project (https://github.com/radare/radare2.git) for several
years.
My first contribution to the Fedora project is the introducti
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Connection to srv closed.
This was after updating to glibc-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64.
Unfortunately I cannot seem to reproduce it
On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Connection to srv closed.
This was after updating to glibc-2.28-9.fc
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
> >
> > $ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
> >
> >bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
> >
> > *** stack smashing detected ***:
On 09/05/2018 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
$ sudo dnf update --best /mntsc
bash exited (and with it, my ssh session) saying:
*
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>On 09/05/2018 02:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>I just hit a weird bug. When I typed:
> >>>
> >>> $ su
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> So... any comments to the concept? Any ideas about workflows or processes
> of managing the EOL values?
>
Looking forward to this but I would say the devil is in the details.
Packagers are not necessarily programmers (I include myself in thi
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 28.20180902.0
Commit(x86_64): 24d4ceb612af5abfa84f275ca9d8aff862e69d47aaeb177c0d64f30865fd7a9f
Commit(aarch64):
c4deda4174d1a8f92db430c4f9cd39f79976e6e1b220d310a8b4867b7dda4ab3
Commit(ppc64le):
05af7ceb30fd26545a8cd8e3f
Hello All!
With recent erlang-js build there is no more packages dependent on
mozjs24 in F-29 and Rawhide. It wasn't build successfully since Fedora
26 and no longer updated by upstream. Let's retire it.
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=17602
* https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Hi all,
As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
bit of catching up to d
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > But which one? For 2.28-9.fc29 or 2.27.9000-35.fc29? If GDB can't
> > find the build ID, I'd suggest try the other version as well.
>
> Oh I see, good point. I only
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>
> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
> at 3.28.x or at various stage
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > But which one? For 2.28-9.fc29 or 2.27.9000-35.fc29? If GDB can't
> > > find the build ID, I'd su
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> mega-update.
So you'd rather we ship GA with early pre-release builds of GNOME that
have had little-to-no testing? From a downstream point of view I'm not
going to fix t
>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
>> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>>
>> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
>> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
>> bit of catching
Jan, as a longtime clementine user, I'm sorry to read this. I had no
idea upstream had gone dormant. It works great for me, but I have no
idea of what pain may have been involved in getting/keeping it in that
form for users like me. Unfortunately, I too am short on time (and I
don't do C).
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
openssl 1.1 devel packages (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625440 )
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:30:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > But which one? For 2.2
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:30:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:59 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
>> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
>>
>> We are quite a bit behind wi
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:15:26PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> >
> > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> > mega-update. There's just far too much that could go wrong. Please plan to
> > land the mega-update in updates-testing once the Freeze lifts. U-T is
> > ena
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> match it against an older glibc package.
Here are all the versions of glibc installed on that machine
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FreeIPA_Python_2_Removal
== Summary ==
FreeIPA 4.8 will require Python 3.6+ and therefore no longer provide
Python 2 packages on Fedora 30.
== Owner ==
* Name: Christian Heimes (cheimes)
* Email: chei...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
On Fedora 27 t
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1 dev
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:04:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> > [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> > match it against an older
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 22:15 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> > > Mon
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since
> > Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :)
> >
> > We are quite a bit behin
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id
> > [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to
> > match it against an older glibc p
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:56 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:15:26PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> > > mega-update. There's just far too much that could go wrong. Please
> plan to
> > > land the me
I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with qt5 and
does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible, lightweight music
player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has many good plugins for extra
features, supports tagged and folder based album covers, etc.
There is a threa
On mercredi 5 septembre 2018 13:05:06 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
> looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given
> upstream is more or less dead and latest release is more than 2 years old.
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still
> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a
> bit of catching up to do.
We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME update
On 09/05/2018 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). [...]
I don't know if it's a real conflict or a packaging artifact that could
be r
On 05/09/18, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 28.20180902.0
> Commit(x86_64):
> 24d4ceb612af5abfa84f275ca9d8aff862e69d47aaeb177c0d64f30865fd7a9f
> Commit(aarch64):
> c4deda4174d1a8f92db430c4f9cd39f79976e6e1b220d
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA here?
If 3.29 is not what GNOME folks had ever wanted to ship in the Beta,
why are we hearing about it o
On 2018-09-05 13:41, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with
qt5 and does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible,
lightweight music player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has many
good plugins for extra features, supports tagged and fol
On 2018-09-05 14:22, John Florian wrote:
I also prefer my "random" music pre-shuffled so I can see what's
coming up and what's behind me. (I honestly own so much music
sometimes I don't know who just played.)
And now that I've posted that, I see there's Edit/Randomize List vs.
Playback/Shuff
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:22 AM, John Florian
wrote:
> On 2018-09-05 13:41, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> I would recommend you check out qmmp. It's light weight, runs with qt5
> and does what it sets out to do, which is be a flexible, lightweight music
> player that runs on qt5, supports skins, has
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 74
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME update, but that
> stopped, I assume because it felt like kind of rote bureaucracy rather than
> helpful, since it was basically the same every time. Maybe it's useful after
> all to hel
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts
> with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on
> 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes
> openssl 1.1 devel packages (
> https://bugzilla.redh
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 31/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180903.n.0):
ID: 274863 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863
ID: 274919 Test: i386 univers
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I'd be open to a "shortcut" version of the Change process that
> essentially says "hey, we're doing this again". But this way we'd get
> visibility across teams and externally. For better or for worse, our
> Change list is a starting poi
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:14 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
>
> > Dunno what to do wrt the ongoing freeze and getting final 3.30 in F29
> > Beta, I guess it may be too late for that. Any opinions from QA here?
>
> If 3.29 is not what GNOME folk
n Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:42, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On mercredi 5 septembre 2018 13:05:06 CEST Jan Grulich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't been using clementine for a long time and don't have really time
> > looking into clementine issues. This is even more complicated given
> > upstream i
On 09/05/2018 12:24 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
>> in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
>> against Fedora packages is available
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-09-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-09-06 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-09-0
Dne 6.9.2018 v 01:59 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> I'd be open to a "shortcut" version of the Change process that
>> essentially says "hey, we're doing this again". But this way we'd get
>> visibility across teams and externally. For be
53 matches
Mail list logo
