Re: pgadmin4 prerequisites and status report for fedora 29

2018-08-30 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, August 27, 2018 9:28:32 PM CEST Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > > all packages required already in fedora, all you need todo is update > > pgadmin4 spec and get it approved. > > > First, I've never used any of the online tools (e.g. koji, etc) for > building a RPM before. I would need som

Re: Intent to drop python2-behave

2018-08-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 23.8.2018 02:11, Miro Hrončok wrote: There is a cluster of PRs: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-behave/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-docx/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-parse_type/pull-request/2 That allows us to drop python2-beh

Re: Idea: let's use Pagure to track Changes

2018-08-30 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, Ben, On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Changes as Markdown files > > This does address the history, but it loses the metadata aspect that > makes the current process clunky. Being able to script against the > metadata fields eliminates trying to parse the wiki text and ho

Re: Intent to split 'postgresql.spec' into 'libpq.spec' and 'libecpg.spec'

2018-08-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote: > While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and > that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive. > I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client providing the libpq library. It's symmetric to postgresql-server name. -- P

Re: Intent to split 'postgresql.spec' into 'libpq.spec' and 'libecpg.spec'

2018-08-30 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:15:19 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and > > that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive. > > > I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client pro

Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

2018-08-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything. Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the dbus.socket file expects a matching dbus.service, not dbus-daemon.service. So e

Re: Intent to retire or orphan keybinder - python2 version

2018-08-30 Thread Johannes Lips
> On 29.8.2018 20:05, Johannes Lips wrote: > > Try contacting the maintainers fo the dependent packages directly? Well, I just did it this morning, let's see if there's some feedback. Otherwise I'll just proceed with the retirement process of the package. Cheers Johannes

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

2018-08-30 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:13 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the > dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service > file, breaking almost everything. > > Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the > dbus.sock

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

2018-08-30 Thread Tom Stellard
On 08/22/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error > > == Summary == > The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot > policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an > ambiguous python shebang, such

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

2018-08-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30.8.2018 20:30, Tom Stellard wrote: On 08/22/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error == Summary == The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an

odd issues with building resp. linking mame

2018-08-30 Thread Julian Sikorski
Hi list, mame-0.201-1.fc30 has failed to build on x86_64, i686 and arm. On each of those a different, but unusual build issue has occurred: - on i686 the linker failed with can not read symbols: memory exhausted - on arm with a ton of issues like errors encountered processing file obj/Release/gene

Re: odd issues with building resp. linking mame

2018-08-30 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 30.08.2018 o 21:51, Julian Sikorski pisze: > Hi list, > > mame-0.201-1.fc30 has failed to build on x86_64, i686 and arm. On each > of those a different, but unusual build issue has occurred: > - on i686 the linker failed with can not read symbols: memory exhausted > - on arm with a ton of i

Re: Buildroot-only modules

2018-08-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users. > Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other > modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented, > such modules could also be used as build dependencies for

iniparser SONAME bump in rawhide

2018-08-30 Thread Robin Lee
iniparser SONAME version bump from 0 to 1 since 4.1. All packages depends on iniparser should be rebuilt: - cava - spindown - ubridge robin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

2018-08-30 Thread Guido Aulisi
Il giorno mer 22 ago 2018 alle ore 21:53 Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error > > == Summary == > The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot > policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an > ambiguo