I cannot take your review right now but i just want to say: Welcome!
Michal
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM Manas Mangaonkar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Manas,i am a Computer Engineering student at the University of
> Mumbai.
>
> i recently began packaging with my first package being this
>
On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga wrote:
>> On 24.8.2018 10:04, Clement Verna wrote:
>>
>> Oh no, the press-random-arrows-to-get-badges app will be gone :D
>
> Actually, I would find tags useful for searching packages related to
> a specific field: for example, I would like to search for 'astronomy'
>
Thanks for the PR! I've merged it and used it to build the updated dokuwiki
package for Rawhide and F29.
I've also done builds for F28 and F27, though I'm wondering if they should be
pushed to updates - on one hand, there's the risk of breaking changes. On the
other, the package has multiple is
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 17:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #1957 F29 Change: Liberation Fonts 2
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1957
> > DECISION (+6, 0, 0)
>
> Sigh!
>
> Really nothing has changed since the decision in Fedora 19 to stick with
> Liberation 1, onl
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:44:40AM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I've also done builds for F28 and F27, though I'm wondering if they
> should be pushed to updates - on one hand, there's the risk of
> breaking changes. On the other, the package has multiple issues and
> leaving it out of date leav
Okay, I am happy to be finally joining the effort.
- Manas
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> I cannot take your review right now but i just want to say: Welcome!
>
> Michal
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM Manas Mangaonkar <
> manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> H
Hi,
I have corrected license of 'screen' from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+. It has been
licensed under GPLv3+ since version 4.2.0.
Regards,
Václav Doležal
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:48 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> What are the possibilities for how a stream is maintained? The cases I can
> think of:
>
> * Indefinite - rolling forward with upstream - "master" "stable" etc.
> * Tied to an upstream version and it's EOL - a "2.1" stream of django
>
* [le
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 4:42:03 PM
> Subject: Golang SIG primary goals?
>
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you
Dne 22.8.2018 v 22:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Can we patch rpm not to show this useless line?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/534
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 08/26/2018 07:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.8.2018 01:03, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
>> I'd be happy to help, but I feel overwhelmed. I've never used the whole
>> stack of koji, src.fedoraproject.org, fedpkg, etc.
>>
>> I need someone to help walk me through the first one.
>
> Feel free t
I would definitely love that!
Having the ability to list all changes at a single place, comment, and even
organise them by tags seems like a way forward.
BTW I know that Pagure stores issues in git, so that could solve the
history problem, although I don't know how exactly is that implemented.
O
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-08-27)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-08-27/fesco.2018-08-27-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting su
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 15:29, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/24/2018 10:24 AM, Brian Clark wrote:
> > Are there any minutes from this meeting?
>
> Here ya go:
>
>
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-containers/2018-08-23/fedora_container_sig_kickoff.2018-08-23-15.00.html
We also have a p
OLD: Fedora-29-20180826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.44 MiB
all packages required already in fedora, all you need todo is update
pgadmin4 spec and get it approved.
First, I've never used any of the online tools (e.g. koji, etc) for
building a RPM before. I would need someone to walk me through the
first one.
Second, I tried your branch RPM, but I c
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar
wrote:
> Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is.
>
Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach
> - Manas
>
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-08-28 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
So audiofile has eight current maintainers (plus all of gnome-sig) but
somehow none of those maintainers has admin privileges on the
repository. Would any of the maintainers like be made an admin so that
SDL and everything that depends on it can drop out of this report?
Just let me know and I'll
Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users.
Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other
modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented,
such modules could also be used as build dependencies for non-modular
packages.
An examp
Suppose I am main admin of a package which I would like to orphan in
release branches, but keep maintaining the package in arbitrary [1]
branches, which are used for building modules. Would this considered
as a valid approach?
How should I handle orphaning the package in this case? I can think
o
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 20/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180826.n.0):
ID: 270334 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/270334
ID: 270401
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/132 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 270139 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/270139
ID: 270140 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL
Hi,
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29342306
Thanks,
Scott
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:33 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
> build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
> from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jerry James wrote:
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
On 2018-08-24 01:27 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hi design team,
>
> Today we have reached the Beta Wallpapers deadline for Fedora 29. The
> schedule[1] has until 27 August to finish packaging. The packaging
> needs to be finished before Beta Freeze of the F28 release, which is
> planned on Tue 2018-08-
Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00:
> python-configobj fale, lmacken, orphan, 45 weeks ago
>terjeros
[...]
I will take python-configobj if nobody else will... BUT I don't quite
u
29 matches
Mail list logo
