Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200:
> I've submitted
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
> to improve the situation.
I've posted on the other overlinking thread about pkgconfig and got
corrected that Requires.private is
Hi Rex,
As part of my Flaptak efforts, I've been looking what libraries and other
packages are used by our most popular applications and I noticed that all
applications using KDE libraries are pulling in a pile of perl packages. As
far as I can tell, this is only because of the two scripts:
/usr
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet <
dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200:
> > I've submitted
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries
> > to improve the situation.
>
> I
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote:
> Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make
> developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure they’re not needed?
Regards,
Graham
—
On su, 12 elo 2018, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM Robert Marcano
wrote:
Greetings.
Hello,
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to
make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
For example, someone developin
Igor Gnatenko wrote on 08/13/2018 06:13 PM:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet <
dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote:
Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200:
I've submitted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_librari
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make
developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure they’
Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Robert Marcano wrote:
>>
>>> And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should
>>> be Recommends and not Requires
>>
>> You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to support that.
>
> Example belo
On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should
be Recommends and not Requires
You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to suppo
On 08/13/2018 08:34 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano
wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably
to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you
On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make
developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
Do you thin
Hi Robert,
Any progress on becoming an approved packager?
It's just to know what I should do with the package.
--
Julien Enselme
http://www.jujens.eu/
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
> I'll gladly give you access. What is your fedora username?
>
> The repo: https://src
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 15:34, Robert Marcano wrote:
[..]
> Yes, read your other email about headers and Requires.private. On
> another email I found another example, where no headers are referenced
> (copy the relevant info here), but I don't think it is easy to detect
> those cases only if pkgcon
On 08/13/2018 10:20 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano
wrote:
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies,
probably to make developers life easier, but
The current [0] crypto-policies in Rawhide contain additional policy
named as NEXT. You can switch the system to it as root via command:
update-crypto-policies --set NEXT
The difference to the current DEFAULT policy is that TLS versions 1.0
and 1.1 are disabled and the minimum key length of RSA k
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180812.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180813.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 68
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.02 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi everyone!
I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself.
My name is Filipe. I currently live in California, though I'm
originally from Brazil. I have been using Fedora and other distros in
that family for close to 20 years now, for fun and profit, starting
with Red Hat L
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180812.n.0):
ID: 265345 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/265345
ID: 265355 Test:
Hi list,
how does one track downstream packages these days? The instructions on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tracking_downstream_packages
do not seem to work anymore, and neither does their dnf flavour:
$ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires `sudo dnf repoquery --provides zlib`
Ostatnio sprawdzono
Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Robert Marcano wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
> And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should
> be Recommends and not Requires
Y
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:52 AM Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Changing Fedora infrastructure to use AMQP brings up a different usage
> case.
>
> Build systems tend to eventually invoke rpmbuild to do the actual build.
>
> Would you like rpmbuild to, say, send time stamped progress messages
> directly th
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> As part of migration of fedmsg from ZMQ to AMQP, I would like to revisit
> what is Copr sending to fedmsg.
>
> Right now we are sending:
>
> 'build.start': {
> 'what': "build start: user:{user} copr:{copr}" \
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Filipe Brandenburger"
> To: "Fedora Devel"
> Cc: "Petr Holášek"
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 8:10:33 PM
> Subject: Self Introduction: filbranden
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself.
> My name is F
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:25 PM Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself.
> My name is Filipe. I currently live in California, though I'm
> originally from Brazil. I have been using Fedora and other distros in
> that fam
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 08:36:56PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> how does one track downstream packages these days? The instructions on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tracking_downstream_packages
> do not seem to work anymore, and neither does their dnf flavour:
>
> $ sudo dnf re
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 08:56:31PM +0300, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After a break I've gotten back to Fedora packaging. Two years ago I
> took an attempt at packaging foma (https://github.com/mhulden/foma)
> but I never finished the work. I think I've now fixed all of the
> issues pointe
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-08-14 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
There is no reason why a connection to an AMQP broker cannot be opened and
carried into a chroot that has networking disabled: rpm installs already
perform chroot's carrying multiple open Berkeley DB fdnos into the chroot.
___
devel mailing list -- deve
Hi,
I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have
backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes.
Unfortunatel
29 matches
Mail list logo
