- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Cronenworth"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 8:11:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> On 08/09/2018 05:12 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> > I have create the SIG page in the
> > wikihttps://fedoraproject.org
As part of migration of fedmsg from ZMQ to AMQP, I would like to revisit what
is Copr sending to fedmsg.
Right now we are sending:
'build.start': {
'what': "build start: user:{user} copr:{copr}" \
" pkg:{pkg} build:{build} ip:{ip} pid:{pid}",
},
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180810.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180810.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 13
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 285.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 at 22:40, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Anyone interested in maintaining this package?
Orphaned now.
Ville-Pekka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/141 (x86_64), 6/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180810.n.0):
ID: 264897 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/264897
ID: 264913
Hi Debarshi,
I can take bouml (and maybe also bouml-doc).
New homepage and latest version of bouml is 7.7.1:
https://www.bouml.fr/historic.html
Maybe we should do a new package review because of the major version bump and
verify with current packaging guidelines? But without going through an of
Hi!
After a break I've gotten back to Fedora packaging. Two years ago I
took an attempt at packaging foma (https://github.com/mhulden/foma)
but I never finished the work. I think I've now fixed all of the
issues pointed out in the review. The new spec and SRPM are here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Mercurial has been rebased to v4.5.3 as has been mentioned earlier.
On 6.8.2018 13:05, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
> we want to do rebase of mercurial for F29 before beta freeze yet. Currently
> we have version v4.4.2 which is already old. Few days ago there have been
> release new stable ver
Greetings.
Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to
make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed.
For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linkin
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default:
System load changed from 0.37 to 0.09
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/264218#downloads
Current test data: https://openq
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi everyone,
I'm still seeking a sponsor. My first package review request was
approved (thanks, Robert-André!), and I've been doing some informal
reviews, which are linked in the comments here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609800
Regards,
Iñaki
El lun., 30 jul. 2018 a las 16:12,
Robert Marcano wrote:
> For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
> probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking
> against Kerberos doesn't means they use the same crypto library
> directly, they could use nss for example.
I think you're most
On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 10:50 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 22/141 (x86_64), 6/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180810.n.0):
>
> ID: 264897Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_doma
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Robert Marcano wrote:
>
> > For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
> > probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking
> > against Kerberos doesn't means they use the same crypto library
> >
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:39 AM Robert Marcano
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Robert Marcano wrote:
>>
>> > For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
>> > probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking
>> > agai
On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 22:06 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Robert Marcano wrote:
> >
> > > For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client,
> > > probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking
>
On Sunday, 12 August 2018 00.02.19 WEST Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm still seeking a sponsor. My first package review request was
> approved (thanks, Robert-André!), and I've been doing some informal
> reviews, which are linked in the comments here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
18 matches
Mail list logo
