F29 System Wide Change: CJK Default Fonts To Noto

= Proposed System Wide Change: CJK Default Fonts To Noto = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CJKDefaultFontsToNoto Owner(s): * Akira TAGOH * Peng Wu Changes the default fonts for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK) languages to Google Noto. == Detailed description == This proposal

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180627.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180625.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180627.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:18 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 17 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 189 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 66.71 MiB Size of dropped packages:2

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

On 06/28/2018 03:30 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > In Fedora 28 and newer, it is no longer necessary for most packages > which install shared libraries to have scriptlets which call ldconfig: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries > > For your convenience, I ra

Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 19.6.2018 11:27, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 13.6.2018 15:14, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >>> I've just started to build the bootstrap sequence in a side tag >>> (f29-python). >>> >>> >> I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of r

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El jue, 14-06-2018 a las 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik escribió: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault [snip] >> Fedora already has a lot of infrastru

Re: streamlining fedora-release (again)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > escribió: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from a > > split "upstream"/"downstream" model into a single repo in src.fp.o. > > > >

Fedora Rawhide-20180627.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 15/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180625.n.0): ID: 253004 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/253004 ID: 253013 Test: i386 Serve

Re: streamlining fedora-release (again)

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:28:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:19 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > El mié, 27-06-2018 a las 11:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > escribió: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to pick up the process of converting fedora-release from

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

Dne 28.6.2018 v 02:00 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > How about changing the default config to use DNF instead? Last I checked, > the tenor was that it should work and that you just prefer using YUM 3 to > ensure the results are the same as when running mock on an EL machine, but > if YUM 3 is not ava

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

Dne 27.6.2018 v 13:44 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > So is it actually possible to use DNF to prepare bootstrap buildroot > containing YUM from RHEL and then the buildroot itself being managed by > YUM? Last time I tried to come up with setup like this I failed > (rhbz#1467314) ... Right. Still not poss

Re: change in -fpic handling?

Hi Dave, Hi Florian, Right - there is a new annobin rpm available - annobin-8.0-1.el8 - which has these changes: * Weak symbols are not generated by the annobin plugin when compiling with -ffunction-sections. There was no point really. Linker garbage collection will not

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Jan Kurik writes: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_YUM_3 >> >> >> Owner(s): >> * Daniel Mach >> >> >> Remove yum (v3) and all related packages from Fedora. >> >>

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 18:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:30 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 16:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Bjö

[Bug 1591449] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Github |

What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently: - 2168 built - ~170 FTBFS - ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for unrelated reasons, etc. What is the criterio

Re: F28's "ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife" causing USB issues?

Hi, On 26-06-18 15:19, Radka Janekova wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>>wrote: Hi, On 25-06-18 13:26, Radka Janekova wrote: ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status

Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

> > > williamjmorenor python-rows > > Done ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: http

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

On jeudi 28 juin 2018 03:30:34 CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > eclipseo libfilteraudio webkit2-sharp Done for me on F28+. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fe

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 20:30 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > usbipjdieter Fixed in git for F28+ Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedo

When will mock make it into copr?

Hi, we've got some issues that were resolved[1] and I was wondering if anyone could give me a bit better idea when would it make into copr? [1] bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580435 fixed: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/f2282d6 Regards, Radka --

Re: What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

On 06/28/2018 06:42 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Stuff that doesn't build and sounds important:  - ceph (also FTBFS in regular rawhide)  - libreoffice (also FTBFS in regular rawhide)  - orca (blocked by pyatspi, looking at it ATM)  - kernel-tools For kernel-tools, it depends on your definition

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

Thanks for the response and sorry for taking so long to reply. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jeff Backus wrote: > > Hmm.. Yes, we've had discussions within the SIG re: window managers that > > support i586/i686, and KDE was on the list of WMs that no longer support > >

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

> "TH" == Till Hofmann writes: TH> Not strictly a script error: I already updated most of my packages TH> without rebuilding them, so they are all false positives. That's fine. I could exclude those but I don't know which they are and the benefit would be pretty low. TH> I guess I'm not th

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

After modifying the script to strip comments and running it against the most recent version of rawhide on my local mirror, I found that abrt, pcsc-cyberjack and slic3r dropped off the list. But I found that libdnf actually appeared on the list when it wasn't before.. I checked the package and tha

Re: What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes: MH> What is the criterion to merge the side tag? I think ultimately that's up to you, but certainly the idea is to balance disruption (breaking builds or rawhide usability) against holding back progress (the approved python 3.7 feature). It would certainly be

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Daniel Mach wrote: > DNF shouldn't diverge from YUM just "because we can". > We're fixing some obvious differences that weren't introduced for any good > reason. > > There will be no special compat layer just a yum -> dnf symlink. > If the compatibility is preserv

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum > is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be > rather confusing to suddenly start selling the message "oh hey yum is > back only now it's

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum > > is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be > > rather confusing to sudden

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:54:05PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this > > was noted as a potential risk. I personally think that staying aligned > > with the rest of the RH distro ecosystem is worth some inconvenience. > > It'll make it

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this > > was noted as a potential risk. I personally think that staying aligned > > with the rest of the RH distro e

Semi-orphaning pysvn

I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build against Python 3.7 (works fine with 3.6) and I don't have the cycles to dig into it. If someone steps up to fix the FTBFS, I'm willing to hang on as a comaintai

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:24 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> >> > When FESCo decided to approve that change to the original plan, this >> > was noted as a potential risk. I pers

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On 06/28/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: To answer the ecosystem question... if I were an EL shop that had been using yum and writing scripts to interact with yum for years, and then I had to rewrite all of my scripts and retrain my muscle memory to call a new command that had similar semantics

Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496 Reply from upstream is delayed... On 28/06/2018 20:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This is a reminder that your package FTBFS with Python 3.7. Please fix > it. We'd like to merge the side tag soon and your packa

Re: Semi-orphaning pysvn

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the > maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build against > Python 3.7 (works fine with 3.6) and I don't have the cycles to dig into it. > > If som

Re: Semi-orphaning pysvn

CCing the maintainers of pyCXX. On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:10 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the > maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build > again

Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496 The code has 2 problems. One is simply a missing "const" keyword, easy to fix. The other problem is that the Qt authors apparently thought it was

Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

On jeudi 28 juin 2018 22:05:36 CEST Antonio Trande wrote: > Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496 > > Reply from upstream is delayed... > > On 28/06/2018 20:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > This is a reminder that your package FTBFS with Python 3

Planned Outage: Build, cloud and web proxy service down/disrupted 2018-07-02 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2018-07-02 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-07-02 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: There have been a set up of updates f

ICU4J License Change notification

ICU4J is now covered by the Unicode License (with MIT and BSD licensed contributed parts.) The Unicode license is very similar to the previous MIT-style ICU license. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora ___ devel-announce mailing list -- de

Planned Outage: PHX2 services down/disrupted 2018-07-03 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2018-07-03 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-07-03 21:00UTC' Reason for outage: There have been a set up of updates f

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On 06/28/2018 08:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: But in Fedora land, we've spent several years selling the message "yum is gone and replaced with this new thing called dnf". It would be rather confusing to suddenly start selling the m

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:45:06PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > To tie two recent devel list threads, this is a perfect use case for > a ~/bin being first in PATH: a ~/bin/yum -> /bin/dnf symlink for > those that don't want to rewrite scripts. As I understand it, regardless of which one we de

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:45:06PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > To tie two recent devel list threads, this is a perfect use case for > > a ~/bin being first in PATH: a ~/bin/yum -> /bin/dnf symlink for > > those that don't want to re

new package built, now what?

Hi, so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from master, koji is happy, etc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Import.2C_commit.2C_and_bui

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make > sure I'm understanding this, we're proposing to eliminate the yum > code, create a symlink for yum pointing to dnf and then change our > documentation to no longer re

Re: new package built, now what?

Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this. fedpkg request-branch f28 On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:51 PM Alois Mahdal wrote: > Hi, > > so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the > late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from

Re: new package built, now what?

On jeudi 28 juin 2018 23:43:09 CEST Alois Mahdal wrote: > Hi, > > so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the > late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from > master, koji is happy, etc. > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_colle

Re: What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

On 06/28/2018 03:42 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:  - 2168 built  - ~170 FTBFS  - ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS fo

dbxtool service errors (was: Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu)

Hello, Gerald. Sorry for late reply, I managed to catch up with this thread only now. On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 18:01, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 07:54, Gerald B. Co

Re: new package built, now what?

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:58:55PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this. > fedpkg request-branch f28 Documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedrepo-req-to-fedpkg -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader __

Re: What is the criterion for Python 3.7 side tag merge?

On 28.6.2018 15:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: The Python 3.7 rebuild in the f29-python side tag is currently:  - 2168 built  - ~170 FTBFS  - ~120 blocked by dependencies that FTBFS Ideally, this would all get fixed before the merge, but that's unrealistic, there are packages that are FTBFS for

Re: new package built, now what?

On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 18:13 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:58:55PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > > Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this. > > fedpkg request-branch f28 > > Documented here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedrepo-req-t

Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7

On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:41 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > sergiomb opencv /builddir/build/BUILD/opencv-3.4.1/modules/python/src2/cv2.cpp:889:34: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive] char* str = PyString_AsString(obj); This problem is not about new gcc flags

Re: Semi-orphaning pysvn

On 28/06/18 14:09 -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: I've been keeping the lights on in this package for years since the maintainer (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. However, it doesn't build against Python 3.7 (works fine with 3.6) and I don't h

Re: new package built, now what?

On 06/28/2018 11:43 PM, Alois Mahdal wrote: > Hi, > > so I'm following "Join the package collection maintainers", I'm at the > late phase when I've submitted new package, ran `fedpkg build` from > master, koji is happy, etc. > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_main

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:49:39PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make > > sure I'm understanding this, we're proposing to eliminate the yum > > code, create a symlink for