Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

On 24.6.2018 03:21, William Moreno wrote: I have updated a few packages to last upstream releases and added to the f29-python tag, sorry for the bad timing Anything that builds in the f29-python tag is great, thank you! -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 18:31, Björn Persson wrote: [..] > > Would you consider now classify such change as serious vulnerability > > introduction? > > If you state a falsehood again and again it will eventually become true? So I'm guessing that answering on the question why /usr/local based paths

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-06-25)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Apologies for the short notice, I should have sent this out on Friday. I have CCed those involved in the various discussions on the devel@ list to make sure they are aware of the agenda. Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180624.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180623.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180624.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora Rawhide-20180624.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/138 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180623.n.1): ID: 251685 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/251685 ID: 251737 Test: x86_64 univers

Non-responsive maintainer of psi-plus: ivanromanov

Hi, does anyone know if ivanromanov is still interested in Fedora packaging or how to contact? I've also opened a ticket to FESCO. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1919 Regards, Raphael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > Till Maas wrote: > > > I do not see any reason why a user would put something in ~/bin that > > > would mask something in /usr/bin except to actually mask the binary. It > > > is the same with other user configu

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 20:32, Björn Persson wrote: [..] > Yes. There is no order that is obviously best for all purposes. > > I know at least one well-designed programming language where, if two > declarations have the same identifier but in different namespaces, and > both of those namespaces are

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 06/24/2018 04:17 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 20:32, Björn Persson wrote: > [..] >> Yes. There is no order that is obviously best for all purposes. >> >> I know at least one well-designed programming language where, if two >> declarations have the same identifier but in di

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 22/06/18 20:56, Till Maas wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: Till Maas wrote: I do not see any reason why a user would put something in ~/bin that would mask something in /usr/bin except to actually mask the binary. It is the same with other user configur

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-06-25 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't see anything urgent to discuss, so let's take the time off. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedo