Dne 19.6.2018 v 04:28 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * Most FESCo votes will be performed in the tickets. FESCo members will
>> have one week[1] from the creation of the ticket to vote. So long as at
>> least three members have voted, the majority of votes at the end of tha
Hi,
> > effort, and nobody outside of Fedora cares about non-SSE2 anymore. Even
> > distros that claim to support non-SSE2 hardware just ship QtWebEngine as
> > SSE2 only. I haven't seen any other distro even picking up my patch, let
> > alone working on it. The Fedora Chromium, V8 and Node.j
= Proposed Self Contained Change: glibc 32 Build Adjustments =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/glibc32_Build_Adjustments
Owner(s):
* Florian Weimer
The glibc32 package is a special package used by gcc and a few other
packages to work around the lack of RPM multilib repository support
= Proposed System Wide Change: Rename Atomic Workstation to Silverblue =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Silverblue
Owner(s):
* Matthias Clasen
The Atomic Workstation variant is being renamed to Fedora Silverblue.
== Detailed description ==
The Atomic Workstation is being rebranded
Hi everyone!
The submission deadline for Changes of Fedora 29 [1], requiring mass
rebuild, takes effect today (on June 19th). All the Changes requiring
mass rebuild sent for review are going to be moved to Fedora 30
release.
The mass rebuild it self is planned on July 11th.
In case you'll need an
Hi everyone!
The submission deadline for System Wide Change Proposals of Fedora 29
[1] is coming pretty soon - in two weeks on July 3rd.
Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier
better. As the deadline applies for System Wide Changes it is always
good to have most of Self
On 13.6.2018 15:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've just started to build the bootstrap sequence in a side tag
(f29-python).
This should not affect you mostly but if you have a Python 3 package and
you are going to update it with new buildtime dependencies, please let
me know or wait until this is d
On Mo, 18.06.18 10:30, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >> The cited BLS spec requires $BOOT be VFAT, are we doing that?
> >
> > Why would we? I mean the idea is that $BOOT can be shared among
> > multiple OSes installed. Which means one really should settle on a
> > format anyone c
On Mo, 18.06.18 16:50, Ondřej Lysoněk (olyso...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18.6.2018 15:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> >> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly
> >> discussed and thought
On Mo, 18.06.18 16:54, R P Herrold (herr...@owlriver.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > > The cited BLS spec is the original one, [1]
>
> ... later: L.P.:
> > [reduce] the size of the sp
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:48:39AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 18.06.18 16:54, R P Herrold (herr...@owlriver.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > The cited BLS s
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> If someone wants keep 32bit fedora alive for pre-sse2 hardware I think
> the only reasonable thing would be to undust the i586 target, then go
> build software which requires sse2 as --target i686 and everything else
> as --target i586, i.e. basically stop the effort to patch
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
>
> Dne 19.6.2018 v 04:28 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> * Most FESCo votes will be performed in the tickets. FESCo members will
> >> have one week[1] from the creation of the ticket to vote. So long as at
> >> least
On Di, 19.06.18 11:14, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:48:39AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 18.06.18 16:54, R P Herrold (herr...@owlriver.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Do, 14.06.18
Dne 19.6.2018 v 12:37 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dne 19.6.2018 v 04:28 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
>>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Most FESCo votes will be performed in the tickets. FESCo members will
have one week[1] from the creatio
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dne 19.6.2018 v 04:28 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
>> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> >> * Most FESCo votes will be performed in the tickets. FESCo members will
>> >> have one week[1] fro
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:18:04PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 19.6.2018 v 12:37 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Dne 19.6.2018 v 04:28 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> >>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * Most FESCo votes will be perf
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:28:04AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Build non-RELRO ELF binaries with
> .plt.got isolation =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/.plt.got_Isolation
>
>
> Owner(s):
> * Florian Weimer
>
>
> Fedora 23 enabled hardening for all packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567450
Bug 1567450 depends on bug 1592426, which changed state.
Bug 1592426 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Guess - Guess OpenSSL
include path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592426
What|Removed
Hello people,
I'm working on making Fedora being able to function completely without the
'initscripts' package (hopefully) some day in the future. I have done some
cleanup in initscripts recently, and I would like to ask maintainers of
packages listed below to check if their package(s) still reall
On 06/18/2018 10:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> With the previous policy, any issues for FESCo would be tabled for a meeting
> and announced on this list before the actual meeting. That gave a chance to
> the community to comment on the ticket and/or attend the meeting to join the
> discussion. Th
On 19.6.2018 11:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of rounds before I
will look at the logs. If you see you package failing for a
non-dependencies related reason, please try to fix it and rebuild it with:
fedpkg build --target=f29-python
Feel fre
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Getting journal support in the bootloader isn't going to happen. I've
>> already talked to the various fs upstreams about it.
>>
>
> Why are you talking to the fs upstreams? The pro
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:40 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> The boot loader spec suggests that $BOOT and the ESP are the same
> thing, and I am very sure this is the best and simplest approach for
> all images that have no explicit reason to depart from that. However,
> the spec does not actuall
On 06/19/2018 03:24 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
...this came along. So what is supposed to stop an attacker who can
inject arbitrary code into the program from modifying the keys?
Or is this supposed to stop buffer-overflow exploits that overwrite
the GOT and thus cause the attacker's code to be
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:57:17AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I also believe we would be willing to reconsider this policy if it
> doesn't work out in practice. We're really just looking for ways for us
> to operate more efficiently here.
For that matter, if a decision is made and it later becom
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:42 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:57:17AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > I also believe we would be willing to reconsider this policy if it
> > doesn't work out in practice. We're really just looking for ways for us
> > to operate more efficiently
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM Langdon White wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:42 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:57:17AM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
>> > I also believe we would be willing to reconsider this policy if it
>> > doesn't work out in practice. We'r
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 16:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks!
> >
> > We currently have a Final release criterion that reads as follows:
> >
> > "A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files
> > used to b
Update to texinfo which should fix the problem with info nodes not
automatically being removed:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-066a9994da
Please test and give karma.
- J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180617.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180619.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 209
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 10.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 06/19/2018 08:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> A further update here: it appears releng, at least for the present, is
> inclined to favour manual tagging of just the kickstarts for the actual
> release compose. Given that, I think we should still have a release
> criterion (since this will
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/138 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180617.n.0):
ID: 250587 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/250587
ID: 250615 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of rounds before I
> will look at the logs. If you see you package failing for a
> non-dependencies related reason, please try to fix it and rebuild it with:
>
> fedpkg build --target=f2
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 00:45 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
I don't think TLS 1.3 will see a wide deployment immediately. Sure,
the
famous top websites and top browsers will, but enterprises will not.
And
especially those with any kind of loggin/auditing requ
I'll be building libdap 3.19.1 soon in rawhide. This includes a soname
bump so dependencies will be rebuilt as well.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 12:16 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we plan to release systemd-239 wednesday-ish and it will be landing in
> rawhide. There's a bunch of new functionality, see
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS. As always, the
> majority of commit
Here is another bug that was opened in 2014 and closed "WONTFIX because it
was directly tied to F24. Here we are with F28
and it still exists: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166978
Again, if we're concerned about the cleaning up of the boot process, why
are we apparently ignoring b
38 matches
Mail list logo
