On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, rpmlint is the one that failed and only on two arches, that's why I
> wanted it to be run again, just in case something was off the first time. I
> thought that if library-without-ldconfig-postin we
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:41 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
wrote:
> My question was more meant in a sense "are those files still necessary"? :)
> I expect they were created to deal with some problems with locale setting,
> but from just looking into them it's hard for me to guess what the initial
>
Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 05. 2018 v 16:42 -0600:
> Hi,
>
> The Fedora Media Writer for macOS at getfedora.org is not signed. I
> filed this bug a couple weeks ago but somehow lost track of it, and
> also it's possibly not the right location for the bug report as it
> relates to what's offered on
Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS
in a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue.
The latest problem was a hang during a build (on
buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedo
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
> particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in
> a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue.
>
> The latest p
On 8.5.2018 02:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I see no point of offering the tox module to import and I would like to
get rid of it. I'll merge the PRs in ~1 week and then I'll remove
python2-tox once again. Please let me know if you think this is breaking
anything.
I will now merge all the remainin
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
>> particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in
>> a second compilation, whic
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:41 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
> wrote:
> > My question was more meant in a sense "are those files still necessary"?
> :)
> > I expect they were created to deal with some problems with locale
> setting,
> > but from
Hi,
today, I've received this bugzilla [1] which basically says,
ABRT breaks Fedora upgrade because there are no longer builds of ABRT's Python2
packages in Rawhide.
Seems, there will be more such packages.
Do you plan some massive marking of Python2 packages as obsolete in Rawhide?
Matej
[1]
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:39 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
wrote:
> I still get the feeling like we are not totally sure these scripts are still
> needed nowadays.
We definitely need it as long as we are relying on the environment
variable to set a locale. particularly to configure locale for
non-de
On Tue, 15 May 2018, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> It could at least tell us the current state of things, and maybe create a
> plan on how to fix things, so they could be eventually removed at some
> point.
>
> In any case I would like to find a new home for these scripts, so they
> don't "bloc
On 05/15/2018 01:34 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is
particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> how/what does those scripts "block"?
>
Right now, it depends on the "/usr/sbin/consoletype", which is also part
of initscripts. I hope it will be possible to just switch it to "tty"
utility instead, so the dependency on initscripts can be c
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:46 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> If you wish to 'clean out' initscripts, migrate the content
> into the relevant bash, and tcsh packages, and be done with it
>
Yeah, you're right. Good point. Though I would prefer these scripts be
moved into 'setup' package instead, so the
= Proposed System Wide Change: Let's Label Our Variants! =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Label_Our_Variants
Owner(s):
* Matthew Miller
* Mohan Boddu
Start using the VARIANT and VARIANT_ID fields in /etc/os-release for
Spins, Labs and the base container image rather than just the
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:21 PM Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Let's Label Our Variants! =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Label_Our_Variants
> Owner(s):
>* Matthew Miller
>* Mohan Boddu
> Start using the VARIANT and VARIANT_ID fields in /etc/os-release
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:29 PM Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:21 PM Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: Let's Label Our Variants! =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Label_Our_Variants
>
>
> > Owner(s):
> >* Matthew Miller
> >* Mohan Boddu
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello All!
Just got a strange issue while generating doc-files from sources with fop:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/763/26980763/build.log
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.fontbox.cff.CFFFont.getProperty(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Object;
at
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:50 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:29 PM Josh Boyer
wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:21 PM Jan Kurik wrote:
>> > = Proposed System Wide Change: Let's Label Our Variants! =
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Label_Our_Variants
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:49:44PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The fedora-release-$VARIANT subpackage also provides a set of Requires:
> that indicates a minimum set of packages that must be on the system for it
> to still call itself "Server Edition". (For example, if you tried to remove
> t
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 01:15:53PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> That's different from counting "we have 87 Fedora Server installs!" based
> on variant though. I'm simply suggesting that in our statistics gathering,
> we take any measurement there with a grain of salt. With a mutable package
> set p
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 23/137 (x86_64), 8/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180513.n.1):
ID: 237471 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/237471
ID: 237492 Test: x86_6
We know about the issue and hoping to fix it soon.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:50 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 05. 2018 v 16:42 -0600:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Fedora Media Writer for macOS at getfedora.org is not signed. I
> > filed this bug a couple weeks ago but somehow lost
On 15.5.2018 14:17, Matej Habrnal wrote:> Seems, there will be more such
packages.
Do you plan some massive marking of Python2 packages as obsolete in Rawhide?
No. My plan was to make python3-foo obsolete python2-foo on python2-foo
removal, but other FPC members are against that plan.
See ht
Today we are starting the Nomination & Campaign period during which we
accept nominations to the "steering bodies" of the following teams:
* FESCo (Engineering) (4 seats) [1]
* Fedora Council (1 seat) [2]
* Mindshare (1 seat) [3]
This period is open until 2018-May-22 at 23:59:59 UTC.
The nominee
Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a third-party
dnf repo?
That would allow Fedora to keep it's general purpose kernel but then allow
performance hounds to install the Clear Linux kernel.
There is something similar already for people who want to use upstream vanill
27 matches
Mail list logo
