Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:18:13AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 04/04/18 18:21, James Hogarth wrote: > [...] > >Can we please get some consistency here? > > > >I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of > >course ansible isn't switching to py3 for the controller (and > >th

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:33:04AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > To be completely honest, if someone wants to drop a python2 subpackage, > that's their prerogative but it does bring up an interesting question. > Normally if someone wants to orphan a package, they're welcome to do so > and ot

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 7.4.2018 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:33:04AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: To be completely honest, if someone wants to drop a python2 subpackage, that's their prerogative but it does bring up an interesting question. Normally if someone wants to

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > Can we get these emails to go to ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org? Dusty ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 7.4.2018 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:33:04AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>To be completely honest, if someone wants to drop a python2 subpackage, > >>that's their prerogative but

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Branched 20180407.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2018-04-07 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Branched 20180407.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > No missing expected images. > > > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > > > > Can we get these emails to go to ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org? They're actually supposed to, and th

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180407.n.0 changes

2018-04-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-28-20180405.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180407.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 186 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.11 MiB Size of dropped packages:10.54 MiB

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miro Hrončok wrote: > So apparently the general confusion/problem here is lack of > communication when removing python2-subpackages. > > Filling a Fedora Change proposal for every single python2 subpackage > removal feels a bit overengineered. So let's set up some basic rules > about what to do wh

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:09 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > There's a good reason we have the change deadlines we do - and > honestly I think dropping a subpackage (as opposed to retiring which > is more visible) is sufficiently disruptive (and annoyingly invisible > otherwise) that it should go thro

Fedora 28-20180407.n.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 218314 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/218314 ID: 218315 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 7.4.2018 18:45, Kevin Kofler wrote> How about just NOT removing the subpackage to begin with if there is no strong reason to (such as upstream dropping support)? The strong reason for me as a packager might be "I don't want to maintain this crap anymore, I see no benefit in it." Strong re

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 04/05/2018 05:10 PM, Eric Garver wrote: ...snip... > Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't this be a nuisance in Ansible for > some time? If the controller side (regardless of distro) defaults to > invoking python2 on the remote then it will fail on f29+. I guess > Ansible has knobs to tell it to

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-04-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 04/06/2018 02:18 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: > Is there some list of packages Ansible depends on? Nope. I don't think there could be either. (Or at least not a very good one). You could possibly scrape the core modules shipped with ansible, but thats going to give you tons of things that aren't

Upcoming gdouros-*-fonts license change and subsequent complications

2018-04-07 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello all, I doubt most of you know or care about George Douros' family of fonts, as almost all of them are quite niche. However, there is one font in particular, Symbola, that a number of users and packagers care for, since it follows closely all the Unicode additions and improvements. A few of