Hi Jonny!
It is sad to hear, but world rolls on.
I would like to thank you. You have pushed fedora and java FX to completely new level. Without your
will and endurance, there would be nothing of this.
The Fedora+FX as you you are started it is a working universe, and the chain you started wil
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Some time ago I've adopted modem-manager-gui. Recently upstream has released a
new version, and while packaging this new version, I noticed a couple of issues:
1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem managers and
connection managers). Each backend module is compiled into a d
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:47:58AM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Some time ago I've adopted modem-manager-gui. Recently upstream has released
> a new version, and while packaging this new version, I noticed a couple of
> issues:
>
> 1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem man
On 22/03/18 08:47, Artur Iwicki wrote:
1) mmgui can work with a couple of backends (different modem managers and connection
managers). Each backend module is compiled into a different .so and they're all included in
the package. mmgui is smart enough to recognize that a module cannot be used b
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:55:53 -
"Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote:
> Both upstream from Blender and embree responded and provided the
> patches. Blender:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060683 embree:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060678
>
> Only op
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
> I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the
> java openstreetmap editor on request by the original
> maintainer. Please adopt it. It needs to be updated regularly
> to follow the current openstreetmap guidelines, currently it
> is
On 03/22/2018 11:32 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the
java openstreetmap editor on request by the original
maintainer. Please adopt it. It needs to be updated regularly
to follow the current openstreetm
HI,
want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
existing koji builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24481
how can i
On 22/03/18 12:10, Martin Gansser wrote:
want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
existing koji builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
> On 22/03/18 12:10, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
>
> Well that package doesn't seem to have an f28 branch, which is a
> bit odd given it doesn't seem to be new.
>
> You should be able to request one with "fedpkg request-branch" though.
>
> Tom
i tried this already, but i don't know where is this "
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
the whole software management stack.
Please read more details on our blog:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/announcement/2018/03/22/dnf-3-announ
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
wrote:
>
> i tried this already, but i don't know where is this "token" under
> "fedpkg.pagure"
> [martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg --module-name
> nuvola-app-mixcloud request-branch f28
> Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value m
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
> version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
> the whole software management stack.
>
> Please read more details on our blog:
> https://rpm-so
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Very unintuitively under /etc/rpkg...
>
> $ ll /etc/rpkg
> total 8
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1545 Jan 5 03:40 fedpkg.conf
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 581 Feb 6 18:14 rfpkg.conf
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Thanks found it !
[mart
On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Martin Gansser
mailto:martin.gans...@gmail.com>> wrote:
i tried this already, but i don't know where is this "token" under
"fedpkg.pagure"
[martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg --module-name
nuvola-app-m
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 136
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On mardi 20 mars 2018 23:35:04 CET djb djb wrote:
> Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
>
> On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
> >> unofficial
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
>> or anything else -- please let me know.
>
Fixed: avahi, bird, biosdevname, mlocate
Michal
___
On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This version
is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating the whole
software management stack.
How does RPM fit into DNF's view of "the whole software management s
> On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Better to use .config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf rather than change
> the global configuration...
>
> Tom
then I should copy the /etc/rpkg/fedpkg.conf file to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
?
___
devel mailing list -- de
On 22/03/18 14:56, Martin Gansser wrote:
On 22/03/18 12:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
Better to use .config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf rather than change
the global configuration...
Tom
then I should copy the /etc/rpkg/fedpkg.conf file to ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
?
No, it reads both so just create ~/.co
> On 22/03/18 14:56, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> No, it reads both so just create ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf like this:
>
> [fedpkg.pagure]
> token = ...
>
> Tom
done so, thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
Hi, I am going to start working on upgrading qdigidoc 3.x spec file[1],
in order making it compatible with the new (beta) qdigidoc 4.x [2].
I am not yet confident in creating spec files from the scratch, like
often happens with major updates, so I would like to ask you some
suggestions that come t
On 2018-03-22, 11:55 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> What you say, basically means you are questioning and deny the
> usefulness of packaging as a whole. The key feature which has
> made Linux distros great and superior to Windows.
I understand your point, but I just wonder whether there is
really
On 03/22/2018 08:51 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> It is sad to hear, but world rolls on.
> I would like to thank you. You have pushed fedora and java FX to
> completely new level. Without your will and endurance, there would be
> nothing of this.
>
> The Fedora+FX as you you are started it is a workin
Le jeudi 22 mars 2018 à 16:19 +0100, Matěj Cepl a écrit :
> On 2018-03-22, 11:55 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > What you say, basically means you are questioning and deny the
> > usefulness of packaging as a whole. The key feature which has
> > made Linux distros great and superior to Windows.
>
OLD: Fedora-28-20180321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 12:10 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> HI,
>
> want to commit a new package for the f28 branch, but this fails with:
>
> [martin@f28 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ fedpkg switch-branch f28
> Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f28
this usually happen when you
On 03/22/2018 07:55 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/22/2018 11:32 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
I orphaned josm
(https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsrc.fedoraproject.org%2Frpms%2Fjosm&data=02%7C01%7Cprzemek.klosowski%40nist.gov%7C
I never packaged something for Fedora before, but can you give me a
chance to see how is the effort to maintain the package before I adopt
it?
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi
>
> I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the java
> openstreetmap editor on r
Release status of the Fedora 28 Beta is NO-GO.
Due to missing RC for the F28 Beta release and presence of blocker
bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one week to
“Target #1” date (April 3rd). We are not going to slip the Final GA
yet.
For more information please check the mi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>>
>> We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
>> version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
>> the whole software management stack.
>
>
>
On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
version is focused on performance improvements, new API and consolidating
the
On 22 March 2018 at 17:49, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started. This
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
We are pleased to announce that development of DNF 3 has started.
On 03/13/2018 07:04 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dbus-broker is a new DBus message bus implementation. We are proposing
> it as the default in Fedora as of F29 [0], and as such we would be
> grateful for as much testing as possible before the switch is made.
>
> For instructions on how to t
On 03/21/2018 01:52 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 04:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 03/20/2018 11:02 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>>
>>> I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28,
>>> fedora-27, fedora-26, and fedora-28-modular.
>>>
>>> Would someone please mak
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/126 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 209537 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209537
ID: 209540 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://ope
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 209813 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/209813
ID: 209849 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fed
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 23:13 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> > On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 03/22/2018 05:40 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> >>>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
>> the simple way.
>>
>> Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8 available in EPEL7.
>>
>> The most effortless
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:24 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>>
>>> The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
>>> the simple way.
>>>
>>> Let's suppose I would lik
43 matches
Mail list logo
