No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
the simple way.
Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8 available in EPEL7.
The most effortless way would be to create subdirectory called 8 at
src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs
with the updated spec file and sources for the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:57:19 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100
> > Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100
> > > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at
Rene Jr Purcell wrote:
> I'm starting with a idea to build a spin of Fedora related to crypto
Hello René!
You should know that "crypto" was short for "cryptography" long before
it came to mean "cryptocurrency", and there are people around who will
misunderstand if you're not explicit. When introd
Thanks for the tip.
I just started using it and it works great! :)
I'm not hooking forked repository, but private branches instead.
The use case is to have multiple versions of packages available in
COPR - especially MariaDB 10.3 and MySQL 8 which are still in
developement.
--
Michal Schorm
Ass
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 28
Beta Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
re
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 28
Beta.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
Before each public release Developme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 13:22 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Thanks for the tip.
> I just started using it and it works great! :)
>
> I'm not hooking forked repository, but private branches instead.
> The use case is to have multiple versions of packag
Of course :)
However I still look forward to some day, when branches named
"private-*", used to help the maintainer with big tasks, will be
fully under the package admin control.
So far, you can see, such branches are used for either different
versions of the package, or big tasks to be worked on
Dne 16.3.2018 v 08:07 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 22:26 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> No missing expected images.
>>
>> Failed openQA tests: 84/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> Virtually all tests currently fail on Rawhide because a complete
> redesign of C
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> The important ones are the ones defined in the policy that gates packages
> and
> are listed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/gating_updates
>
> waiverdb-cli should now support waiving missing results, I'm
> double-checking it
>
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.7
Owner(s):
* Charalampos Stratakis
* Miro Hrončok
* Tomáš Orsava
* Petr Viktorin
Update the Python 3 stack in Fedora from Python 3.6 to Python 3.7.
== Detailed description ==
Python 3.7 ad
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:22:32 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
> > The important ones are the ones defined in the policy that gates
> > packages and
> > are listed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/gating_updates
> >
> > waiverdb-cl
Thanks for your comment, that's a really good point! I think I will start
with the packages and once I will have few accepted go back to have a talk
on freenode with the spin guy's to see the best way to go for the rest of
the adventure!
Have a nice day!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Björn Per
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:23:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100
> > > Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> Your tool can use good old buildsys.build.state.change fedmsg with the
> well known name/version/release fields like this:
>
> https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/
> raw?topic=org.fedoraproject.stg.buildsys.build.state.change
>
Init
On 03/20/2018 10:18 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> FWIW, greenwave does supply the list of missing and/or failed testcase
> names in its API response back to Bodhi. Surfacing those more
> granular details in the Bodhi UI would be good.
I filed an issue about this:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
> the simple way.
>
> Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8 available in EPEL7.
>
> The most effortless way would be to create subdirectory called 8 at
> src.fedorap
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>
>> Your tool can use good old buildsys.build.state.change fedmsg with the
>> well known name/version/release fields like this:
>>
>> https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?topic
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20.3.2018 14:33, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27.2.2018 00:04, Michal Novotny wrote:
Hello,
you can now very easily setup auto-rebuilds fo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 30
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 169.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Congratulations!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180320.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-28-20180319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 122
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28,
fedora-27, fedora-26, and fedora-28-modular.
Would someone please make them stop
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:09 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> All the tests can be green if the "important" ones are missing, they
> > don't show :(
>
> I suspect the problem of missing tests is that dist.rpmdeplint is
> run on x86_64 only, but my update is for s390x only. So bodhi shouldn't
> rely on a r
Jared, which ones have you so far?
I would like to do:
Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson - Go package to interact
with arbitrary JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=1555345
if you have not done that one so far.
Thanks
On Sat,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, djb djb wrote:
> Jared, which ones have you so far?
>
I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial
and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
> I would like to do:
>
> Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson - Go package to inter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
> unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
>
I've now finished golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial as well.
-Jared
_
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 208077 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208077
ID: 208085 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.f
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 208287 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208287
ID: 208323 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fed
Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> wrote:
>
>> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
>> unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
>>
>
> I've now finished gol
Hey, y'all.
As far as I know, qtile is the only package that depends on
python3-xcffib, and nothing depends on the python2- subpackage.
Accordingly, I am have dropped the python2-subpackage in Rawhide.
--
Dulaney.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2018-03-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-03-21 10:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-03-21
What's the best way to monitor for new releases on a package in copr? I
know the release-monitoring.org has "COPR" as a distribution that it knows
about, but I'm not sure if that's the same as the copr repositories we have
available. I'm also not sure how to tell it which package in which project
(
35 matches
Mail list logo
