No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
> On mardi 13 mars 2018 15:14:51 CET Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> Well did you try the obvious, adding libcurl-devel as a BR?
yes, this was the solution.
Thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
Hi all,
Recently, a fedpkg global option --module-name could confuse some
packagers easily because word "module" is sort of ambiguous with the
module introduced by Fedora Modularity. This option is used for
specifying a repository name manually instead of guessing that from git
push URL or the mac
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:56:32PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently, a fedpkg global option --module-name could confuse some
> packagers easily because word "module" is sort of ambiguous with the
> module introduced by Fedora Modularity. This option is used for
> specifying a repo
On 14/03/18 01:02 +0100, René Genz wrote:
On 13.03.2018 15:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote:
[snip]
I propose to:
add a new major point 2, so:
"2. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Mainta
On 03/14/2018 08:56 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> * --repository-name or --package-name, what do you think which one is
> proper for fedpkg?
Either of these will do. I also like pingou's --name suggestion, with a
--namespace (defaulting to rpm would be nice).
I'd probably have a slight preference fo
On 14 March 2018 at 15:09, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 03/14/2018 08:56 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>> * --repository-name or --package-name, what do you think which one is
>> proper for fedpkg?
>
> Either of these will do. I also like pingou's --name suggestion, with a
> --namespace (defaulting to rpm
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently, a fedpkg global option --module-name could confuse some
> packagers easily because word "module" is sort of ambiguous with the
> module introduced by Fedora Modularity. This option is used for
> specifying a repos
On 14.03.2018 14:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 14/03/18 01:02 +0100, René Genz wrote:
>> On 13.03.2018 15:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 12/03/18 21:02 -0300, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
[snip]
>
> You could add a link saying something like "To make a one-off
> contribution see below" to skip past t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54:07AM +0100, René Genz wrote:
> Taking feedback from Athos and you into account here is a new proposal:
> ---8<---
> 3. One-off contributions
>
> Changes to existing packages can be suggested by submitting (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html)>.
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-03-15 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-03-15 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-03-15 1
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180314.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-28-20180313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180314.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi.
GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release?
Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to build
now?
Or better use build override new gcc for this packages?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
14 matches
Mail list logo
