> On 02/17/2018 04:38 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> Since a VagrantBox is a deliverable, should this be a system wide change?
Sure, I guess I can do that. I am not sure.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> On 02/17/2018 01:38 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> Where is this ISO? There have been questions at ask.fpo for two
> releases looking for this and I couldn't find them anywhere.
There hasn't been one for the last two releases due to build failures. However,
here's a nightly: https://koji.fedorapro
There's an "fpc" package, which is a compiler, and a "lazarus" package, which
is a fancy IDE. Though not always, sometimes when compiling GUI applications,
Lazarus recompiles parts of its codebase using FPC. Unfortunately, this makes
the IDE dependent on a specific version of the compiler - if y
You should create new override for fpc and fpc-src to F27 and F26 koji
builds
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/new
пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:25, Artur Iwicki :
> There's an "fpc" package, which is a compiler, and a "lazarus" package,
> which is a fancy IDE. Though not always, sometimes w
And for F28 now.
пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:30, Vascom :
> You should create new override for fpc and fpc-src to F27 and F26 koji
> builds
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/new
>
> пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 11:25, Artur Iwicki :
>
>> There's an "fpc" package, which is a compiler, and a "laz
On 26/02/18 08:25, Artur Iwicki wrote:
Now, I have submitted an update for FPC. When this update is pushed to stable,
it will probably break Lazarus for some use cases, as detailed above. Is there
any way I can perform a koji build for Lazarus using the not-yet-stable version
of FPC, so I cou
On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple
exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not
link to the newer version.
On the other hand, libgcc switched to GPLv3+ with exceptions (but those
exceptions do
Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? ;)
V.
Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having
> gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due
> to random
> reasons
On 11/08/2017 04:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other
distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for
OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to what
are effectively app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress?
> ;)
My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBC
I believe that won't be necessary, as I took a look Lazarus's koji build for
F28 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25292607) and on all
arches root.log says that fpc 3.0.4 was used during the build.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc
(whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I have
to control this manually?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 21.02.2018 15:16, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 1:34:48 PM CET Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>>> # dnf update
>>> [...]
>>> Problem 1: package apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 requires apitrace =
>>> 7.1-7.fc27, but non
On 02/26/2018 07:11 UTC, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
(Note, it's all unstripped.)
It would be interesting to apply /usr/bin/size, then sum the columns.
Similarly for the debuginfo, particularly the line numbers section.
Optimizations which re-schedule, move, or merge instructions
can ge
You must control this manually.
пн, 26 февр. 2018 г. в 14:54, Artur Iwicki :
> Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc
> (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I
> have to control this manually?
> _
Thanks Louis!
On 02/21/2018 11:15 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache license 2.0, which
>> is
>> now incompatible with GPLv2. This change will be in new minor release
>> of
>> CUPS -
On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc
> (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I
> have to control this manually?
You can define an RPM macro for the version in fpc, e.g., by addi
On 02/26/2018 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple
>> exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not
>> link to the newer version.
>
> On the other hand, libgcc swi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 12:21 +, Vascom wrote:
> You must control this manually.
Until bodhi enablement for F28, this is not needed. Moreover, it won't
work ;)
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Till Hofmann
wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2018 12:53 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > Is there a way I can automatically do something like "BuildRequires: fpc
> (whatever version); Requires: fpc = version-used-during-build", or would I
> have to control this manually?
>
> You
Hi folks,
I would like to inform you, that netpbm package will now require Python3
package.
This change will be applied in Fedora Rawhide and Fedora 27.
Regards
Josef Ridky
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel
Hi,
Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
or anything else -- please let me know.
I fixed :
nsca
openalchemist
perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII
perl-Linux-Pid
perl-Unicode-LineBreak
toppler
Regards,
Xavier
__
Hi,
Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
or anything else -- please let me know.
I've fixed :
nsca
openalchemist
perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII
perl-Linux-Pid
perl-Unicode-LineBreak
toppler
Regards,
Xavier
___
On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 13:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds?
> > systemd would like to use it.
>
> Why? What are the benefits?
I've seen a couple of cases where LTO find
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 11/08/2017 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple
> >> exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not
Fixed smaclient.
Att.
--
Rafael Fonseca
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified
few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools.
The main reason for this breakage is that these sites only support
Diffie-Hellman with 1024-bit parameters which are considered too weak
by this change.
I was bitten by this. To workaround the issues in FF and TB, it might
help to change all the "dfe" options in about:config to False, which
might break other sites, but it helped me to access my email again.
Vít
Dne 26.2.2018 v 16:37 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos napsal(a):
> Hi,
> regarding the str
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified
few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools.
The main reason for this breakage is that these sites only support
Diffie-Hellman with 102
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> I believe however that we should gather as many data as we can related
> to this security update in Fedora28, and decide after F28 beta is
> released on whether to back this change off, or to ignore this
> breakage. Any data gathe
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Alternatively, if you want to strengthen the system crypto policy,
then it should not apply to web browsers at all. Or web browsers
should automatically use the weak policy. (We'd need the weak policy
in glib-networking, too.)
Read
On 26 February 2018 at 07:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:24:28AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > But size is easy:
> > > $ du -s /var/tmp/inst-O*
> > > 74428 /var/tmp/inst-O3
> > > 56136 /var/tmp/inst-O3-lto
> > > 61992
On 02/26/2018 11:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified
few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools.
The main reason for this breakage is
Il 26/02/2018 09:25, Artur Iwicki ha scritto:
As far as I can see, previously this wasn't an issue, since joost (fpc & lazarus
maintainer) didn't usually perform FPC & Lazarus updates, preferring to build new
versions in Rawhide / early branched and have them roll out with the next Fedora
rele
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:47:31PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 26 February 2018 at 07:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:24:28AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > But size is easy:
> > > > $ du -s /var/tmp/inst
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Mattia Verga
wrote:
> Il 26/02/2018 09:25, Artur Iwicki ha scritto:
>
>> As far as I can see, previously this wasn't an issue, since joost (fpc &
>> lazarus maintainer) didn't usually perform FPC & Lazarus updates,
>> preferring to build new versions in Rawhide /
On 26 February 2018 at 16:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[..]
>
> > Can you repeat above and show output of the command "size /var/tmp/inst-*"?
>
> After stripping:
> 24808 /var/tmp/inst-O2
> 21060 /var/tmp/inst-O2-lto
> 22240 /var/tmp/inst-O3
> 21812 /v
Hi there, I working on packaging the last missing (on Fedora repos)
piece of user side Estonia ID card software stack: the web extension[1]
for web signing
I need some help in fixing %install section of spec file
https://pagure.io/webextension-token-signing_spec/blob/master/f/webextension-token-sig
Am Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:05:55 +0100
schrieb Germano Massullo :
> Hi there, I working on packaging the last missing (on Fedora repos)
> piece of user side Estonia ID card software stack: the web
> extension[1] for web signing
> I need some help in fixing %install section of spec file
> https://pagur
Why did my update get marked CRITPATH? It doesn't look like I can even set
that flag, much less by accident...
Thanks,
Richard
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:33 AM
Subject: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27
To: hobbes1...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:40:23PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> It creates various search indices for the IMAP server (which is why it
> wraps Xapian). The manpage is available from
> https://cyrusimap.org/imap/reference/manpages/systemcommands/squatter.html
> Technically the test suite si
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 13:30 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Why did my update get marked CRITPATH? It doesn't look like I can even
> set that flag, much less by accident...
Because pulseaudio depends on it.
Try dnf remove soxr and notice what it drags down with it.
- Yanko
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Il 26/02/2018 20:09, Jens Lody ha scritto:
> Did you try "make -C host-linux install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" in
> %install ?
Thank you! Now compilation starts at least!
[...]
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.s3F6YN
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ '[' /builddir/build/BUILDR
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied
now you got this is the error
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
> "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
JJ> Ok, so the problem is ignoring important warnings, in this case:
JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp: In function 'int
JJ> stem_version_set(Xapian::WritableDatabase*, int)':
JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp:267:1: warning: no return statement in function
JJ> returning non-voi
Hello!
I'd like to get some of my favorite packages into fedora and I'm okay with
maintaining them.
I've already been maintaining some of them on my personal copr (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/wyvie/) and building others for
myself only.
I've created my first review request on bugzilla
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:42:40PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JJ" == Jakub Jelinek writes:
>
> JJ> Ok, so the problem is ignoring important warnings, in this case:
> JJ> imap/xapian_wrap.cpp: In function 'int
> JJ> stem_version_set(Xapian::WritableDatabase*, int)':
> JJ> imap/xap
I will take your review.
*William Moreno Reyes*
Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua
IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor
2018-02-26 14:51 GMT-06:00 Ilya Rum :
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to get some of my favorite packages in
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-27 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
Does Firefox use the system wide crypto policy? I adjusted
/etc/crypto-policies/config to be set to LEGACY and ran
update-crypto-policies, but Firefox still won't let me access southwest.com:
An error occurred during a connection to southwest.com. SSL received a
weak ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key i
Hello,
you can now very easily setup auto-rebuilds for your src.fp.o package:
1) make a SCM package in COPR with Clone URL pointing to the src.fp.o fork
(please, use the https:// cloning option)
2) make sure "Webhook Rebuild" checkbox is checked when you are creating
the package
3) Go to settings
On 02/26/2018 06:02 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Does Firefox use the system wide crypto policy? I adjusted
> /etc/crypto-policies/config to be set to LEGACY and ran
> update-crypto-policies, but Firefox still won't let me access southwest.com:
>
> An error occurred during a connection to southwest.c
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied
>
> now you got this is the error
The makefile is not correctly honoring DESTDIR.
Kevin Kofler
_
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
>>> mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied
>>
>> now you got this is the error
>
> The makefile is not correctly honoring DESTDIR.
Since it uses qmake, you could
Il 27/02/2018 01:16, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 20:57 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
mkdir: cannot create directory '/etc/opt/chrome': Permission denied
>>> now you got this is the error
>> The makefile is not correctly honor
On 02/22/2018 07:34 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> If I understand correctly there was a new lorax build [1] that completed
> at 01:11 UTC (02/23) that then made it into the runroot of a task [2] that
> was part of a pungi compose [3] that started at 14:54 UTC (02/22).
runroot is confusing here as we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/26/2018 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 02/22/2018 07:34 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> If I understand correctly there was a new lorax build [1] that completed
>> at 01:11 UTC (02/23) that then made it into the runroot of a task [2] that
>> w
Thank you!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
59 matches
Mail list logo
