Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
>
> Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as language
> > specifc macros have moved into their own space
>
> So we removed Perl from buildroot, but there is alread
Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 09:01 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
> >
> > Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as
> > > language
> > > specifc macros have moved
i get this message from limb in the pagure ticket [1]
The Bugzilla review bug creator could not be found in FAS. Make sure your FAS
email address is the same as in Bugzilla.
I am not aware that the email addresses are different.
[1] pagure ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/iss
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] :
>
> I am not aware that the email addresses are different.
Your FAS account has the email mgans...@online.de but
your bugzilla account uses mgans...@alice.de .
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 03:40 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> But anyway, why don't we
> >> have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories?
> >> "updates-batched" could be enabled
On Feb 20, 2018 08:54, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind
BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both for the
two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that succeeded but
has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap server)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list --
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> zdohnalc2esp cups cups-filters enscript foomatic hplip jbigkit mgetty
> openobex pnm2ppa ptouch-driver python-cups python-smbc qpdf s
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] :
>
> Your FAS account has the email mgansser(a)online.de but
> your bugzilla account uses mgansser(a)alice.de .
>
> Emmanuel
where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
___
On 18/02/18 16:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Fedora decided to use gcc as *the* compiler [1], and frankly, we have
enough trouble getting packages to compile without trying to support
more than one compiler (vide the lass mass rebuild).
Also a *lot* of core GCC devs work on Fedor
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] :
>
> where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing lis
On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
List of packages and respective maintainers:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
Done in packages where I am admin.
TY!
J.
___
d
On 01/05/2018 02:50 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AuthselectAsDefault
Change owner(s):
* Pavel Březina
Replace authconfig with authselect and make authselect a default tool
to configure PA
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in some mysql
> community packages as a dependency but I looked through the options and I
> couldn't find ANYTHING that wou
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] :
>
> You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page.
>
> Emmanuel
the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Pictures/bugzilla.png
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] :
>
> the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see:
When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de
in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts?
Emmanuel
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
sign-libs.
This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹².
This should not be a problem, but still useful to know.
⁰ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm
A new release of rpm-ostree, a hybrid transactional image/package system is now
available:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2018.2-1.fc27%20rpm-ostree-2018.3-1.fc27
Direct link to main release notes:
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/releases/tag/v2018.2
In this release
Greetings!
Today, on 2018-Feb-20, we have reached Fedora 28 Change
Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially
complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by
default, it must be enabled at Change Completion
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] :
>
> When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de
> in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts?
>
> Emmanuel
It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address
mgansser (at) alice.de does not
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 14:17] :
>
> It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address
> mgansser (at) alice.de does not exist anymore.
> How can I delete this old email account?
You can file a bug against the Bugzilla product:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=
According to the Fedora 28 schedule [1] we are going to reach the
"Software String Freeze" deadline in one week on 2018-Feb-27. Beyond
this deadline there should not be any changes in strings, ideally.
If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages
that follow Fedora release
Hi,
I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my
packages (molsketch).
This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel:
Requires: openbabel%{?_isa}
The failure is the same on both f26 & f27:
results:
- arch: x86_64
item: molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc26
out
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two
weeks)
=
Meeting started by nils at 15:00:10 UTC.
Minutes:
I'm probably in the minority, but I wasn't even aware of this sight and I
found it very helpful in addressing some CVE's for one of my packages. It
provides links to bug trackers, links to other distros, and links to
commits that address the CVE.
It would be really helpful to provide a link in the
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my
> packages (molsketch).
> This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel:
>
> Requires: openbabel%{?_isa}
>
> The failure is the same on both f26 & f27:
>
> results:
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts.
I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing
with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and
Requires for sonames because ROS does not use proper sonames (and
therefore they
Hi,
I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I
made repo queries, if any package puts fil
Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
> with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
> architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
>
> This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I
> made
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 30/129 (x86_64), 8/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 194274 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/194274
ID: 194275 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_defa
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
Fixed in rawhide:
aspell
exempi
gpxsee
groff
joe
jpilot
libcgroup
libpng12
libpng15
libtiff
man-db
pilot-link
Also fix
Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide,
includes a soname bump affecting
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gc --repoid=rawhide
...
Macaulay2-0:1.9.2-8.fc28.x86_64
aisleriot-1:3.22.4-3.fc28.x86_64
asymptote-0:2.41-1.fc27.x86_64
autogen-0:5.18.12-6.fc28.x86_64
bi
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
I've added the missing BuildRequires to the following packages:
elog gfm hyperrogue ocaml-mccs spasm-ng tfdocgen tilp2
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing
> > > > a lot of
> > > > the spadework of
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 07:08 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in
> > > some mysql community packages as a dependency but I
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error
>> concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel exists on all arches, why
>> do I get this particular error message?
>
> Your package is multilib'd?
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:15 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error
> > > concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel exists on all arches, why
>
On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide,
> includes a soname bump affecting
The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it.
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group
Red Hat,
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both
NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that
NM> succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap
NM> server)
Interestingly enough, cyrus-imapd
On 02/20/2018 05:40 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
> with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
> architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
>
> This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so f
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hey,
>
> today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
> sign-libs.
Does this mean that the python bindings no longer depend on
rpm-build-libs and hence wo
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to
>> rawhide, includes a soname bump affecting
>
> The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it.
That's very good news, thanks!
-- Rex
__
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro got added during the review
I think the reviewer in this case was wrong to suggest that, just use
Requires: openbabel
FYI, the package is multilib'd because it has a -dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into i
Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the
f26 package to batched.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
>> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro got added during the rev
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the
> f26 package to batched.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>>> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
>>> Molsketch.
Hi there,
version 0.1.9 of libsamplerate which I've recently built in all
branches changed its license from GPLv2+ to BSD (2-clause).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview hydrogen
jaaa lensfun libgnomecanvasmm26 libiec61883 liblo liblrdf lib
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> I am asking because the rpm documentation leaves quite a lot to be
>> desired. If I went and changed all my "Requires: foo" to "Requires:
>> foo%{_isa}" in all my non-noarch packages, would I be plain wrong, or
>>
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know.
Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 00:03 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview
> > h
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
> random
> reasons and I grepped all l
On 20 February 2018 at 13:11, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
[..]
> today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
> sign-libs.
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs
error: Failed dependencies:
librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
python3-rpm-4.14.1-6.fc28.1.x86
Hi All,
Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a build
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-02-21 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-02-21 10:00 PST US/Pacific
2018-02-21 1
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the
> full list
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> So this may not be all the packages which would need a
> BuildRequires:gcc in them. I had two packages without
>
Hi,
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages
> in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
Done: boost-gdb-printers cppunit libabw libcdr libcmis libcss libe-book
libeot libepubgen libetonyek libexttextc
58 matches
Mail list logo
