Il 03/02/2018 14:12, Richard Shaw ha scritto:
Well I could not find any activity for 2018 so we're well past 3 weeks
at this point. I have filed a ticket here:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1838
But I don't want to maintain the packages, I can barely keep up with
the ones I already have on he
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:08 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/08/2018 04:53 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Brett Lentz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/02/18 14:09 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
* rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>>>
>>> rpmdev-newspec still inserts
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> I'll do another GCC build tonight, might take a day or so to make it into
> the buildroots if all goes well.
I'm still waiting on the armv7hl build but the rest have completed so
thanks!
Richard
On 02/11/2018 08:40 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
$ fedpkg request-branch
Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the
"fedpkg.pagure" section in your "fedpkg" user configuration
WTF?! So, instead of going to a web interface and making the change (ol
De: "Jan Chaloupka"
Hi Jan
Apologies for the delayed answer, I was beating the PR into shape to address
review comments.
> Let's keep moving forward,
> improving the infrastructure for other folks and pushing new ideas and
> improvements into practical solutions.
Let's move forward, I'm sic
I may wait a few days for all the build problems with gcc 8 and there are
still several packages that haven't been properly rebuilt against boost
1.66, but I plan to build yaml-cpp 0.6.0 and rebuild its dependencies in
the near future:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --source --whatrequires
"libyaml-
De: "nicolas mailhot"
À: "Jan Chaloupka"
>> I mentioned a list of things that you did not answer fully. Most important
>> to me:
>> - your macros do not generate build-time dependencies, which I see as
>> one of the drawbacks.
> Generating BuildRequires dynamically needs changes in rpm toolin
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thankfully, as Rex Dieter points out, this is finally being addressed in
> Qt 5.11 (see https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.11 and
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-54464). Unfortunately, that release
> is still a few months away from now. (Qt upstream currently expe
On Sunday, February 11, 2018 7:39:33 PM EST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I have built qt5-qtbase with these backported patches in a Copr:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kkofler/qt5-qtbase-print-dialog-advanced/
Thank you, Kevin.
That was an annoying bug so *big* thanks -- it works just fine.
Dne 8.2.2018 v 16:03 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
> There might be valid reasons for the old stuff appearing in _some_ spec files
> beyond your knowledge, for example specfile maintained by upstream, usable not
> only by Fedora.
AFAIK all mentioned parts are not needed in Fedora and all supported RHELs.
10 matches
Mail list logo
